「rust」の検索結果

Use when initializing, running, measuring coverage, or triaging a cargo-fuzz target in a Rust crate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when crossing a public API boundary, guarding complex invariants, or hardening untrusted input or integration seams. Not for remote or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate one already reviewed Proto UI pull request at its exact head when current-user or active standing authorization, live GitHub permission, trusted CI, review state, and repository rules all agree. Use only after pui-review; do not use to manufacture approval or bypass a blocked pull request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design guide + benchmarked pitfalls for building Monte-Carlo / Simulated Annealing refinement layers on top of greedy hex-grid layouts for code visualization (packages/gui/src/store/hexLayout.ts, sandbox/hex-sandbox, future Rust ports). Use when: (1) planning to add MC/SA on top of an existing hex-grid pack, (2) deciding whether a simpler SA would match a hierarchical MC with force-directed + chain drag, (3) budgeting wall-clock for million-node cold-start, (4) debugging "blob turns Swiss-cheese" or "folders stop nucleating" during MC refinement, (5) choosing between folder cohesion and raw Σ-link-length as cost function. Contains four hard-won, quantified lessons and anti-patterns that would take a full day of experiments to rediscover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pattern for adding derived edge types in the Grafema Rust orchestrator (main.rs). Use when: (1) need to create new graph edges derived from existing edges (e.g., MODULE-level DEPENDS_ON from IMPORTS_FROM), (2) Datalog joins on large edge sets time out, (3) adding enrichment steps that combine data from multiple resolver outputs, (4) need to understand how resolver outputs flow through the orchestrator pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix stale Haskell analyzer binaries silently being used by the orchestrator even after a successful rebuild. Use when: (1) modified `packages/js-analyzer/` or other Haskell analyzer source, ran `scripts/build-native.sh ... cabal install`, but a subsequent `grafema analyze` shows old behavior (missing new edges, no new node types, etc.), (2) `~/.cabal/bin/grafema-analyzer` has fresh timestamp but `grafema analyze` produces output as if the change didn't happen, (3) a test verifying new analyzer output passes locally in unit tests but fails in end-to-end runs that go through the orchestrator. Root cause: the Rust orchestrator's `resolve_binary` checks `~/.grafema/bin/<name>` BEFORE `~/.cabal/bin/<name>`, so any stale copy that was once installed there (possibly months ago) shadows the fresh `cabal install` output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SurrealDB Surrealism WASM extension development. Write Rust functions, compile to WASM, deploy as database modules. Part of the surreal-skills collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SurrealFS virtual filesystem for AI agents. Rust core + Python agent (Pydantic AI). Persistent file operations backed by SurrealDB. Part of the surreal-skills collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SurrealDB 3 architect and developer skill (tracks v3.1.4+). SurrealQL mastery, multi-model data modeling (document, graph, vector, time-series, geospatial), schema design, security, deployment, performance tuning, SDK integration (JS, Python, Go, Rust, Java, .NET, C, PHP, Swift, Kotlin, Ruby), Surrealism WASM extensions, SurrealML scope coverage (preview), built-in MCP (v3.1+) and standalone SurrealMCP, LangChain Python integration, editor tooling (LSP v0.1.6, tree-sitter, CodeMirror v1.0.6, VS Code/JetBrains/Neovim/Zed), and ecosystem integrations (Surrealist v3.9, Surreal-Sync, SurrealFS, SurrealKit v0.7, n8n, Agent Skills, setup-surreal). Universal skill for 30+ AI agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", or "check my diff".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured marketing brainstorming when direction is unclear. Use when the agent doesn't know which skill to run, the user is vague about what they need, there are multiple valid marketing paths, or someone says 'I don't know where to start', 'what should we market', 'explore approaches', 'help me think through this', 'marketing ideas', 'what campaign should I run', 'where do I start with marketing', 'what's our marketing plan', or 'I have no idea how to promote this'. Explores 2-3 approaches and recommends the best path forward with a specific next-skill handoff. Even vague frustration like 'nobody knows about my product' or 'how do I get users' should trigger this when no specific channel or tactic is mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create high-converting free resources that capture emails and build trust. Produces complete lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates, toolkits, quizzes) with landing page copy, thank-you page, and follow-up email sequence. Use when someone needs a list-building asset, wants to grow their email list, needs an opt-in incentive, a content upgrade, a gated download, or top-of-funnel content. Triggers on 'lead magnet', 'ebook', 'checklist', 'template', 'free resource', 'opt-in', 'grow my list', 'email capture', 'content upgrade', 'list building', 'gated content', or 'free download'. Even if someone just says 'I need something to capture emails' or 'how do I get more subscribers', this is the skill. Every lead magnet passes a 4-gate quality test before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides a complete workflow for implementing verified email retrieval on Android Credential Manager API. Use this skill to integrate a secure, OTP-less email verification flow into an Android app. This skill solves the problem of high-friction sign-up processes by leveraging cryptographically verified credentials from trusted providers like Google.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with the upstash-box Python SDK for sandboxed cloud containers with AI agents, shell, filesystem, git, cron schedules, snapshots, and a headless browser. Use when building with Upstash Box in Python, creating a sandbox or isolated environment to run untrusted or agent-generated code, running AI coding agents in containers, giving an agent a cloud dev environment with a shell and repository, browser automation from a box, scheduling recurring jobs inside a box, saving and restoring snapshots, or orchestrating parallel boxes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with the @upstash/box TypeScript/JavaScript SDK for sandboxed cloud containers with AI agents, shell, filesystem, git, cron schedules, snapshots, and a headless browser. Use when building with Upstash Box, creating a sandbox or isolated environment to run untrusted or agent-generated code, running AI coding agents in containers, giving an agent a cloud dev environment with a shell and repository, browser automation from a box, scheduling recurring jobs inside a box, saving and restoring snapshots, or orchestrating parallel boxes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when cutting, debugging, or verifying a pythinker-code (TSC monorepo) release — changesets flow, the ci release-packages version PR, release.yml anatomy, npm Trusted Publishing OIDC, native assets, brew tap, CDN redeploy, and their failure modes. Invoked by /release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate and debug the DNS C2 system non-interactively. This skill should be used when Claude needs to launch an exploit, send commands to a compromised session and collect output, diagnose why a payload is not calling home, or inspect C2 server state. Triggers on requests like "run the exploit", "send whoami to the session", "why isn't the payload calling back", "check what sessions are active", or "debug the C2".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNS C2 operator skill for the AgentCore sandbox breakout demo. This skill should be used when the user asks to run C2 verification, attack a victim chatbot, send commands to a compromised session, retrieve exfiltrated data, or interact with the DNS C2 system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED before writing code for any feature touching auth, payments, credentials, tokens, sessions, file upload, user data, untrusted input, deserialization, network endpoints, or data deletion. Scope by that surface, not the task label — a research/experimental/local-only feature with none of it doesn't need this. Invoke it, record answers inline in the design doc or PR description, then write the code. Skipping this is how auth bypass, token leakage, and delete-the-wrong-record bugs ship. If the feature touches any of those surfaces and this hasn't run, the design is incomplete — do not proceed to implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up safe working habits and a change log so you always know what Cowork has done to your files — and can undo anything. Use when setting up file protection guardrails, for establishing safe automation habits, during initial access configuration, when granting file permissions for the first time, or when the user says "is cowork safe", "file safety", "what if it deletes my files", "audit trail", "safety setup", "I'm nervous about file access", "how do I trust cowork with my files", "can cowork mess up my computer", "I heard someone lost files", or "how do I stay in control".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill during Phase 5 formal hardening. Provides tool selection, proof harness patterns, security/purity audit expectations, and verification result interpretation for Rust (Kani), Python (hypothesis), and TypeScript (fast-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to scan, investigate, or characterize a URL. Submits to URLScan (unlisted by default), cross-references with VirusTotal and OTX, extracts the parent domain and resolved IP for follow-up investigation. Returns verdict, redirect chain, contacted infrastructure, and screenshot. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。