「sat」の検索結果

Generate an interactive HTML brand playground that shows your brand rendered live — palette, typography, logo, voice — with a social card and OG image preview that updates as you tweak tokens. Opens in browser. The visual approval step for the /cmo flow: /visual-style writes the brand, this skill shows it. Use when the user says "show me my brand", "brand playground", "preview my brand", "what does our brand look like", "visual preview", "brand kit", "see my colors", "how does my brand look", or after /visual-style completes and the user needs to approve the visual identity before moving to content generation. Also use when someone says "I want to see it" during any brand-building conversation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Salary Benchmarking — market range by role/location/experience, total comp breakdown (base, bonus, equity, benefits), recruiter negotiation talking points

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provision a zero-config, no-signup, temporary Upstash Redis database for an AI agent with a single POST to https://upstash.com/start-redis, with no account, API key, or SDK setup required. Use when an agent needs scratch Redis right now and the user has not provided credentials, for short-term memory across tool calls, conversation history, a sub-agent work queue, ranked recall, or a quick prototype or demo. Covers idempotent creation and re-fetching credentials, calling the database through the body-style REST API or the official SDKs, and telling the user how to claim it. The database lives 3 days unless the user claims it; not for production data, PII, or secrets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AI chatbot conversation flows with fallbacks. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-chatbot-flow related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start or end a forked session for exploring rabbit holes without losing the main conversation's context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

対話コンテキストをexportする。 会話で共有された目的・意図・設計判断・制約条件を `.dev/contexts/` ディレクトリに書き出し、PRが存在する場合はPRコメントにも投稿する。次の作業者（レビュワー、別セッションのAI、バグハンティングのAIなど）に引き継ぐ。 ユーザーが「コンテキストを書き出して」「対話コンテキストをexport」「会話した内容を.devに保存して」と言った時に使用する。

対話コンテキストをimportする。 `.dev/contexts/` ディレクトリに保存された過去の対話コンテキストを読み込み、開発の継続やレビューに活用する。 ユーザーが「コンテキストを読み込んで」「対話コンテキストをimport」「.devのコンテキストを読んで」と言った時に使用する。

Import a memory export from another AI assistant (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, etc.) into this agent's memory — conversationally, additively, and with the pasted content treated as data. Use when the user wants to bring over what another assistant knows about them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter talk mode — conversation and research, no repo changes. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/talk` or `$talk`; never auto-select from a natural-language question or design discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Makers 开发专家团 AI Agent 工程师 Skill — Claude Agent SDK、 OpenAI Agents SDK、LangGraph、DeepAgents、CrewAI 框架集成， SSE 流式响应、conversation store、EdgeOne Makers Agent Runtime。 触发词：AI Agent、聊天机器人、LLM 应用、多 Agent 系统、 Claude SDK、OpenAI Agents、LangGraph、CrewAI、SSE 流式、 智能助手、AI 推理端点。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to know where a piece of reporting actually came from — the user gives an article URL and asks "where does this come from?", "who is the original source?", "is this just a rewrite?", or another skill needs the provenance chain before grading or citing a report. Follows an article's links and named attributions back to the originating vendor, government, victim or actor document and returns the chain, the primary's stated access and confidence language, publication dates, and every hop it could not resolve. Deterministic — a script or the Liberty91 platform resolves the chain; the model does not reconstruct it from memory. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /intelligence-writing. Works on any URL with no API key.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when prioritising CVEs, the user asks "should we patch X first?" / "is CVE-YYYY-NNNNN being exploited?", or wants weaponisation, EPSS, and KEV context combined into a patch-now-vs-later recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks "which SAT should I use for X?", wants the index of Structured Analytic Techniques, or is choosing between quality-of-information-check, ACH, key-assumptions-check, devils-advocacy, indicators of change, etc. Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to hunt in the organisation's own Microsoft Sentinel workspace — sweep the logs for IOC hits (IP, domain, hash, URL, account), hunt behavioural TTPs from MITRE ATT&CK techniques, run KQL against live data, or check which tables the workspace actually ingests. Discovers available tables first and only generates KQL for tables that verifiably exist, so hunts adapt to each environment's connectors. Commonly chained by the /*-investigation skills to answer "were we exposed?". Reads $SENTINEL_TENANT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_SECRET, $SENTINEL_WORKSPACE_ID. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing the assumptions underlying an analytical judgment, the user asks "what are we assuming?" / "are these assumptions still valid?", or before publishing a high-impact assessment. Standard SAT applied during major assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to check whether an organisation/domain has been claimed by a ransomware group, profile a specific ransomware group (TTPs, leak-site infra, IOCs, YARA), or aggregate ransomware victim claims by country/sector/timeframe. Backed by ransomware.live's leak-site scrapes — 27k+ victims across 330+ groups. Commonly invoked by /domain-investigation, /ransomware-ecosystem, /threat-actor-profiling, and detection-engineering workflows. Reads $RANSOMWARE_LIVE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker (edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。