2,059 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Coach leaders and managers to prepare, run, and review high-bandwidth meetings that advance real work and decisions. Use for meeting retrospectives, employee work reviews, decision meetings, agenda and question design, direct feedback, meeting-quality diagnosis, or repeated low-value discussions. Preserve direct standards without taking over the worker's work or degrading the truth signal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover and review local human-AI conversations from Claude Code, Codex, opencode, Grok Build, and Cursor. Use when the user wants to revisit, search, extract, summarize, or compare work across Agent session stores, time ranges, projects, or named conversations. Follow the user's requested output; question clustering, problem-space mapping, artifact review, drift analysis, and insights are optional lenses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct and report long-running or multi-turn research, architecture questions, reviews, decisions, completion results, and status as a clear, self-contained brief. Use when a reader must re-enter earlier context, understand the real question and its relationships, distinguish verified facts from judgment and open evidence, or make a decision without reconstructing the work log. Quote the relevant original user wording before substantive analysis, keep one coherent main line, use spatial diagrams when relationships matter, and finish with an explicit decision boundary and practical next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform an AI agent into a disciplined software development partner with strong judgment, transparent decisions, proportionate verification, and craftsmanship. Use for software implementation, feature work, bug fixing, refactoring, optimization, migrations, and sustained collaboration inside a codebase. Do not use merely because a task involves an AI agent; use a dedicated agent-design skill when the primary problem is agent architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about AI coding agents, agent runtimes, or similar internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research why neural architectures and training methods work through forward computation, geometry, gradients, optimization dynamics, historical experiments, and competing explanations. Use for deep mechanism questions about neural networks, AI models, layers, representations, or training; explain the meaning in plain language with evidence and explicit limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Agent Skill design quality with an opinionated, practice-derived rubric informed by public specifications and examples. Use when reviewing, auditing, comparing, or improving SKILL.md files and skill packages. Produces evidence-backed findings, optional multi-dimensional scoring, and prioritized changes; treat the result as diagnostic guidance, not official certification or a universal standard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coach workers, employees, and individual contributors to turn meetings, transcripts, minutes, and work notes into better execution: infer leader expectations, diagnose previous work, identify next actions, judge delivery readiness, and prepare a high-bandwidth update. Use after meetings, during work, before reviews, or across repeated low-value discussions. Perform semantic review from source evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create platform-native content that resonates with each community's culture. Use when adapting technical content for WeChat, Hacker News, Reddit, Medium, Twitter/X, Dev.to, or LinkedIn. Transforms generic writing into content that feels written BY that community, not AT them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "process beta reader feedback", "alpha reader feedback", "feedback round", "synthesize reader feedback", "reader notes", "beta feedback", "reader readiness check", "review copy", "send the draft to readers", "share with readers who don't use GitHub", "triage the reader panel", or wants to collect, reconcile, and act on external reader feedback for a story project. NOT for running the simulated reader panel itself (use reader-panel), rounds with a professional editor (use editorial-review), or for checking a manuscript is ready to query or publish (use submission or publishing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks for a "sensitivity reader", "authenticity reader", "cultural review", "is this portrayal okay", "real people in my novel", "defamation", "can I use song lyrics", "epigraph permission", "permissions", "quote permission", "fair use", "AI disclosure", "do I need to disclose AI", "send to my editor", "editorial round", "Word file for my editor", "editor review copy", "co-author", "collaborate on a book", "shared world", "back up my book", "does this echo my source", "similarity check", "check overlap with my earlier books", or wants to run human editorial, ethics, permissions, or collaboration workflows around a story project. NOT for contracts or selling rights (use publishing), or reader feedback rounds and review copies for readers, including the GitHub review-copy setup (use feedback-triage).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
拆解已筛选爆款内容为什么能传播，分析受众情绪、分享动机、有效立场、首批传播者和可迁移元素。用户问一条内容为什么爆、打中了谁，或哪些机制能跨赛道借鉴时使用。 English: Explain why a selected breakout post spreads by analyzing audience emotions, sharing motives, effective positioning, early sharers, and transferable elements. Use when the user asks why content went viral, whom it resonated with, or what can be adapted across categories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages RoPA for complex multi-entity corporate groups including entity-level versus group-level records, intra-group transfer documentation, and shared processing coordination. Activate for group RoPA, multi-entity, corporate group, intra-group transfers, subsidiary records, holding company.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working in a multi-module Maven project. Covers parent POM conventions, shared dependency management, inter-module rules, build ordering, and Spring Boot 4 modular starter selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working in a multi-module Maven project. Covers parent POM conventions, shared dependency management, inter-module rules, and build ordering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines for modern Avalonia UI layout using Zafiro.Avalonia, emphasizing shared styles, generic components, and avoiding XAML redundancy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Admin account register: system, main and backup admin, seats, plan, 2FA, shared logins and access-review dates, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for access reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, testing, or preparing ANY contribution or pull request to the JSONbored/awesome-claude (HeyClaude) repo — adding a community content entry (agent/MCP server/skill/hook/command/rule/guide/collection/statusline), or making a platform/code change (website, registry package, MCP package, scripts). The repo has two separate review paths: a private, one-shot "HeyClaude submission gate" that decides single-file content PRs, and the shared gittensory-orb bot that posts an advisory readiness/linked-issue comment on platform/code PRs but does not itself merge or close content PRs. Unlike JSONbored/gittensory and JSONbored/metagraphed, a linked issue is OPTIONAL here — do not import their mandatory-linked-issue rule into this repo. Invoke for any "contribute to / open a PR against / submit an entry to / fix a bug in awesome-claude (HeyClaude)" task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OI-3 spike harness — the INLINE (non-forked) readability-guidance variant. Surfaces the shared readability standard into the calling skill's own context. Use only when a spike consumer skill invokes it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surfaces Han's shared standard for explaining technical work to a reader who will not implement it into the calling skill's own context, so the caller writes its escalations, confirmation turns, and stops as a concrete outcome the reader could observe rather than as a mechanism. Use when a skill is about to ask a person a question, stop for an input, or explain a technical consequence to someone who will not open the code. Governs what a run says to a person in a turn, where readability-guidance governs the shape of a written deliverable. Runs in the caller's context and hands control straight back; it does not produce a deliverable of its own, rewrite anything, or judge the caller's work. Carries guidance only and adds no self-check step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard to a target you already have — a file on disk, text pasted into the prompt, or a draft already produced in the conversation — by dispatching the readability-editor to rewrite its prose so the main point comes first, headings are descriptive, each paragraph carries one idea, and sentences stay short and active, while preserving every fact. Use when you want to make a document or draft readable, edit or polish prose for readability, clean up writing, tighten wording, or re-apply the readability standard to something already written. Rewrites prose only, leaving code, diagrams, and citation identifiers unchanged. Does not write new feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not restructure code or review it — use refactor to restructure code and code-review to audit it. Does not judge the underlying work or raise findings; it only rewrites the writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert a stakeholder summary markdown file into a single self-contained HTML executive report — bottom line and decision asks up front, supporting detail later — styled with a Test Double-derived palette and self-contained mermaid diagrams. Use when the user wants to turn a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary into an HTML report, generate an HTML version of a summary doc, or produce a shareable HTML file from a summary markdown. Produces an HTML sibling file only; does not publish anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create original short videos using the 同乘反应曲线｜设施加速、共同峰值、骤停与离场 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。