1,513 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit a rehabilitation recovery tracking system -- evaluate standardized outcome instruments (FIM, Barthel Index, SF-36, DASH, LEFS, PROMIS), functional assessment scoring accuracy, SMART goal and milestone tracking, regression detection with alert workflows, pain scale calibration (NRS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze defense supply chain systems — DFARS compliance assessment, CMMC cybersecurity readiness, sole-source and DMSMS risk identification, counterfeit parts prevention per SAE AS6171, ITAR export control verification, and supplier tier mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze project dependencies for health, security, and bloat — audit outdated, deprecated, vulnerable, duplicate, heavy, and unused packages across npm, pip, cargo, go mod, and more. Produce a dependency health score, CVE inventory, license compatibility matrix, bundle size impact assessment, and a prioritized update plan with migration paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit transit damage prediction and prevention systems for packaging failure mode analysis, handling chain risk assessment, claims pattern detection, and protection level optimization..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes asset lifecycle planning systems for capital expenditure forecasting, replacement scheduling, total cost of ownership modeling, depreciation tracking, and facility condition assessments using IFMA standards and Facility Condition Index scoring..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit curriculum management software for learning outcome alignment, pacing guide optimization, standards coverage mapping (Common Core, NGSS, state standards), differentiation support, assessment design quality, and content gap detection across grade levels and subjects..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a threat model document. Use when the user says "threat model", "threat modeling", "STRIDE analysis", "attack surface analysis", "security design review", "what are the threats to this system", "adversarial analysis", "identify threats", "security threat assessment", or needs to systematically identify and document threats to a system or feature - even if they don't explicitly say "threat model".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a penetration test scope document. Use when the user says "pentest scope", "pen test scope document", "penetration testing scope", "scope of engagement", "rules of engagement", "what to include in a pentest", "security assessment scope", "red team scope", "bug bounty scope", or needs to define the boundaries, objectives, and rules for a penetration testing engagement - even if they don't explicitly say "scope".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify, score, and mitigate delivery risks for a program or release. Use when the user says "risk review", "what could go wrong", "risk register", "delivery risks for this release", "program risk assessment", "identify blockers before they hit", or wants to pressure-test a plan before committing - even if they don't say "risk review". Based on "The Phoenix Project" by Kim, Behr & Spafford (unplanned work, fragile systems, single points of failure) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (scoping risk, milestone pressure, hidden assumptions).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Structured context analysis before acting. USE FOR: questioning assumptions, mapping dependencies, identifying blind spots, validating scope of any task or subject. Use to contextualize, question, analyze before implementing, review premises, prevent hallucination, structured assessment. DO NOT USE FOR: simple tasks where task-intent suffices, direct implementation, code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Runs canonical batch analysis before site-wide checks. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when user says "audit blog", "blog audit", "site audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "check all blogs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Minimal personal narrated-video pipeline — a topic becomes a talking-head-free explainer MP4 (1080p or 4K) via script → Azure TTS (SSML) → Remotion. Use when the user wants a quick narrated video from a topic without the full video-podcast-maker machinery (no extra skills, no thumbnails/shorts/publish matrix). Do NOT trigger for heavy production needs — use video-podcast-maker for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates comprehensive production readiness reviews and assessments for GKE clusters and workloads across scalability, security, reliability, observability, backup/DR, and cost optimization. Use when asked to productionize, prepare, assess, audit, or review a GKE cluster or workload before going live to production. Don't use for deep-dive single-domain implementation (use specific domain skills like gke-workload-scaling, gke-platform-security, gke-workload-security, gke-service-networking, gke-reliability instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing admin-level cleanup in a Salesforce org: deleting unused fields, removing inactive Flow versions, deactivating legacy automation, running Salesforce Optimizer or Org Check, and performing destructive metadata deploys. Triggers: 'clean up unused fields', 'delete inactive flows', 'run Optimizer', 'org has too many custom fields', 'remove old workflow rules', 'Flow version limit'. NOT for assessing or reporting on technical debt (use architect/technical-debt-assessment). NOT for code-level refactoring or Apex cleanup (use apex/ skills).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when configuring FSC financial planning objects, designing periodic review cycles, modeling risk assessment workflows, or tracking goal progress in Financial Services Cloud. Trigger keywords: FinancialGoal, FinancialPlan, goal tracking, risk tolerance, review cycle, financial planning workflow, Discovery Framework, Revenue Insights. NOT for wealth management process discovery — use admin/wealth-management-requirements. NOT for Action Plan template mechanics — use admin/fsc-action-plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when planning user adoption, structuring Salesforce training materials, drafting release communications, or running a change impact assessment for a Salesforce rollout or update. Triggers: user adoption plan, training materials, release announcement, change impact, go-live communication, communication plan, training plan by persona, adoption metrics, LoginHistory adoption report, PromptAction, training sandbox, go-live checklist, post-go-live feedback, super user program, pilot group. NOT for org deployment mechanics or sandbox promotion — use admin/change-management-and-deployment. NOT for adoption of an Agentforce or Einstein AI feature — use admin/ai-adoption-change-management. NOT for configuring the in-app prompts themselves — use admin/in-app-guidance-and-walkthroughs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, or audit a Change Advisory Board (CAB) process for Salesforce deployments: change classification (standard, normal, emergency), required approvals, deployment gate sequencing, and integration with external ITSM tooling. NOT for scoring how risky one release is - use admin/deployment-risk-assessment. NOT for executing or troubleshooting the deployment itself - use admin/change-management-and-deployment. Also covers: the CAB charter (membership, quorum, decision rights), the CAB decision record artefact and its linter, the change classification matrix, the deployOptions a CAB decision pins (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, runTests), the 10-day quick-deploy validity window, the deploy-window vs freeze-register check, and the emergency (ECAB) path with its mandatory retrospective.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning, reviewing, or troubleshooting Salesforce metadata releases and admin deployment processes. Triggers: 'change set', 'deployment plan', 'rollback', 'DevOps Center', 'SFDX deploy', 'release checklist', 'production deployment', 'validation only deploy', 'quick deploy', 'test level', 'rollbackOnError', 'destructive changes', 'package.xml for an admin release', 'deployment status'. NOT for change set upload mechanics — use devops/change-set-deployment. NOT for scoring release risk up front — use admin/deployment-risk-assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ออกแบบคอร์สออนไลน์ตั้งแต่ curriculum, lesson plan, assessment, จนถึง sales page พร้อมวางแผน completion rate
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan or review software architecture through a small expert panel. Use when the user explicitly asks for architecture planning, system design, technical strategy, an architecture assessment, a design review, or a system health review. Do not use for ordinary PR review, debugging, or implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized GitHub PR intelligence agent for automatically gathering comprehensive context from Pull Requests. Activate when users need CI failure analysis, review comment investigation, or PR status assessment. Triggers on requests like "CI 실패 원인 찾아줘", "gather review comments", "check PR status", "analyze PR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a structured AI readiness audit for any organization. Scores 8 dimensions, identifies gaps, produces a prioritized 90-day action plan with budget ranges.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。