「surface」の検索結果

Query NFT and token data, trade NFTs on Seaport, swap ERC20 tokens via DEX aggregator, configure wallet signing providers, and build/register/gate AI agent tools on Base. Covers the full OpenSea developer surface across CLI, MCP server, shell scripts, and SDK. Pick the right sub-skill using the routing table below, then read that sub-skill's SKILL.md for operational detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security review and implementation guidance for Odoo website, portal, public controllers, JSON routes, QWeb output, and browser-facing assets. Use when exposing Odoo data over HTTP, adding portal/public pages or forms, using sudo, handling tokens, rendering HTML, or reviewing web attack surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browserless turns Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit into a remote browser service you can self-host or consume as a managed platform. It gives automation stacks a stable WebSocket and REST surface for screenshots, PDFs, scraping, persistent sessions, and debugging without hand-managing browser fleets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark clean and incremental Xcode builds, surface compile and configuration hotspots, and produce an approval-first optimization plan before changing project files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill uses OpenClaw's healthcheck workflow to inspect the host running the assistant, surface risky exposure, and turn the findings into a staged hardening plan. It is for operator-style audits with explicit approval gates, not a generic software listing or a replacement for OS administration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies content gaps using the Ahrefs API v3 /site-explorer/organic-keywords endpoint. Compares competitor keyword profiles and surfaces untapped opportunities with volume, KD, and SERP feature data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map testable surfaces, audit existing tests for quality, and write test specifications that prevent AI shortcuts. Use when asked to "audit tests", "specify tests", "test architect", "map test coverage", or invoke /test-architect. Two modes — audit (evaluate existing tests against Beck's principles) and specify (write test specs for new code). Powered by Carmack × Beck quality-testing.md reference doc. Stack: Next.js App Router / TypeScript / Vitest / Cypress / tRPC / Prisma / Neon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scout the TouchDesigner community for what's HYPED right now — community showcases, recent tutorials, generative-AI bridges, hardware interaction trends, visual-aesthetic trends of 2025-2026 — then propose tdmcp tools that ride those trends AND are easy to build. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm new feature ideas based on what's trending in TouchDesigner, asks for 'hype' or 'trending' features, asks 'what are people doing in TD right now / what's hot / what's hype', wants tools inspired by community trends, asks to scout TD trends/aesthetics/integrations, or says things like 'ideias hype', 'novas ideias', 'o que está em alta', 'criar ferramentas para o que está bombando', 'tendências do TouchDesigner'. Also for follow-ups: refresh, rescout one surface, re-rank under another profile, deepen a trend, or filter for buildable-easy items. This is an EXTERNAL trend ideation harness — complementary to tdmcp-feature-discovery (which is INTERNAL gap analysis). It produces `_workspace/hype-scout/HYPE_TOOL_BACKLOG.md` ranked by Hype × Build-Ease; it does NOT build. Once a feature is chosen from the backlog, hand it to tdmcp-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidate the td-trend-scout reports under `_workspace/hype-scout/` into one prioritized HYPE_TOOL_BACKLOG.md — dedupe trends across surfaces, vet each candidate against the real tdmcp codebase (layer fit, operator coverage, bridge work), rank by Hype × Build-Ease, and emit a 'Ready for tdmcp-pipeline' top-5. Use when a td-hype-synthesizer agent is consolidating scouts at the end of the tdmcp-hype-scout harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP/HTTPS application-layer reconnaissance after a web service is identified: fingerprinting, content/API discovery, JS/source maps, proxy/cache topology, WAF, CMS, and known CVE/PoC candidates. Recon only — do not exploit, write files, or obtain a shell. Hand CVE candidates and attack surface to the operator, who may select /web-attack. Non-HTTP ports belong to /recon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for a weekly operating review (Friday wrap or Monday plan) — review progress against the 90-day priorities, surface stalled open loops, and set next week's focus. This is the PERSONAL operating review; distinct from /audit (checks the kit's connections/freshness) and /level-up (finds one automation to build). Trigger on "/weekly", "weekly review", "weekly planning", "how did this week go", "plan my week".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to analyze correction trends, surface recurring patterns, and graduate repeat corrections to guardrails or anti-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility audit, scoped to the surfaces a product actually has. Detects web / rendered_markdown / terminal / native_app / video_audio / document / headless, then applies only the criteria that bind. WCAG 2.1 AA in full for web; not at all for headless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure Mycelium's own scaffold token cost (CLAUDE.md + engine + harness + canvas + memory) and surface a structured estimate. One-shot audit; pair with /framework-health for trend tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building anything USER-FACING (or with persuasion/retention/cancellation/consent/pricing flows, or that touches vulnerable people) to surface design-level harm the security/privacy/compliance gates miss: dark/deceptive patterns and foreseeable misuse. Assumes the product works as designed and asks who it could harm and whether it is Happier-negative. NUDGE, not a block.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-critique specification documents using extended thinking — surfaces hidden assumptions, contradictions, missing edge cases, and scope creep before implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ripgrep-powered dead-code crawler that finds stale, broken, or orphaned JavaScript/CJS/MJS modules in the Agent Studio framework. Walks a target directory, checks each file for external references, and surfaces (or deletes) unreferenced files. Prevents registry bloat and silent tool dropouts from modules no one calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic design refinement before implementation — challenges assumptions, surfaces alternatives, identifies risks before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft RFIs and manage the ambient issue registry. Reviews issues surfaced by other skills, escalates to formal RFIs. Triggers: 'draft RFI', 'write RFI', 'drawing conflict', 'review issues', 'issue queue'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope-specific code gap analysis — extracts referenced codes from project docs, researches what should apply, surfaces the delta. Triggers: 'code research', 'what codes apply', 'code check', 'ADA requirements', 'egress'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation QA planning — independent of /review (the developer chooses whether to run them sequentially or in parallel), only when the change has a running surface worth driving. Interviews the developer to turn the specs and the diff into an executable QA specification (specs/qa/QA-<N>-<slug>.md) that /execute-qa runs. The agent drives browser and shell; the human steps in only at named handoff points. Use only when the user asks to plan manual QA — never trigger automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with strong hierarchy, thoughtful systems, and polished implementation that avoid generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user wants to build or redesign web pages, flows, components, or full app surfaces, or when another better-web-ui skill needs shared project design context before other better-web-ui skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate 5 distinct, production-grade UI variations for a requested new or existing section, component, page, flow, or shell, then help the user preview and apply one. Use when the user asks to add or redesign UI like a hero, pricing, navbar, auth flow, dashboard shell, ecommerce surface, or data component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。