「via」の検索結果

Develop, debug, and test LangBot plugins. Use when creating new LangBot plugins, fixing plugin bugs, setting up a LangBot test environment, or testing plugins via WebSocket. Covers plugin component architecture (EventListener, Command, Tool), the plugin SDK API (invoke_llm, get_llm_models, send_message, plugin storage), common pitfalls, and automated WebSocket-based testing. Triggers on "langbot plugin", "lbp", "GroupChatSummary", "plugin debug", "langbot test".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate a LangBot instance through its built-in MCP (Model Context Protocol) server. Use when an AI agent needs to manage LangBot — list/create/update/delete bots, agents, pipelines, models, knowledge bases, MCP servers, and skills — over MCP instead of raw HTTP. Covers the /mcp endpoint, API-key auth (web-UI lbk_ keys and the config.yaml global key), the tool surface, and client configuration. Triggers on "langbot mcp", "manage langbot via mcp", "langbot /mcp", "langbot mcp server".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wren Engine CLI workflow guide for AI agents. Answer data questions end-to-end using the wren CLI: gather schema context, recall past queries, write SQL through the MDL semantic layer, execute, and learn from confirmed results. Use when: user asks a data question, requests a report or analysis, asks about metrics, revenue, customers, orders, trends, or any business data; user says 'how many', 'show me', 'what is the', 'top N', 'compare', 'trend', 'growth', 'breakdown'; user wants to explore, analyze, filter, aggregate, or summarize data from a database; agent needs to query data, connect a data source, handle errors, or manage MDL changes via the wren CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wren CLI for AI agents — a semantic SQL layer over 22+ databases (Postgres, MySQL, BigQuery, Snowflake, Spark, …). The actual workflow guides live inside the `wren` CLI itself; this is just a discovery stub. Use whenever the user asks a data question (how many, show me, top N, compare, trend, breakdown, metric, revenue, customers, orders), wants to install / set up Wren Engine, connect a new database, connect SaaS data via dlt (HubSpot, Stripe, Salesforce, GitHub, Slack), generate or regenerate an MDL project from a database schema, enrich a project with business context (enum meanings, units, cubes like ARR / DAU / churn), or turn a project's context layer into a shareable GenBI web app / dashboard and deploy it to Vercel or Cloudflare. Triggers: 'install wren', 'set up wren engine', 'connect database to wren', 'connect SaaS to wren', 'load hubspot / stripe / salesforce data', 'generate mdl', 'scaffold wren project', 'enrich wren context', 'augment my project', 'add cubes', 'build a dashboard', 'make a shareable analytics app', 'deploy my context layer as a web app', 'genbi app', 'wren onboarding', 'wren usage', 'wren generate mdl', 'wren dlt connector', 'wren enrich context', 'wren genbi'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Onboard a user to Wren Engine end-to-end. Walks through environment checks, project scaffolding, connection configuration via .env, and first query. Use when: user wants to install Wren Engine, set up a new data source connection, or bootstrap a new project from scratch. Triggers: '/wren-onboarding', 'install wren', 'set up wren engine', 'wren onboarding', 'connect new database to wren'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Augment a Wren project with business context that DB schema cannot carry — enum value meanings, units (USD vs cents, ms vs sec), NULL semantics, magic sentinels (-1 = unknown), soft-delete default filters, business synonyms, time-grain / TZ conventions, cross-system identifiers, currency rules, canonical-table preferences, AND named aggregation metrics (ARR, churn, DAU, WAU, NRR) proposed as cubes. Runs in one of two modes selected at session start: `grill` (one question at a time, user-driven) or `auto-pilot` (agent infers and applies, escalates only on conflicts and high-blast-radius additions like new cubes / views / relationships). Reads everything under <project>/raw/ (PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, code, data dictionaries) and optionally samples low-cardinality columns from the live DB (grill mode), compares against the current MDL / cubes / knowledge (rules + NL→SQL pairs), then fills gaps via the ten-category gap catalog and the cube proposal flow. Confirmed findings are written back to the right sink. Use when: user says 'enrich context', 'augment my project', 'grill me on this project', 'auto-fill my context', 'agent doesn't understand our docs / enum values / units / null meanings', 'business context is missing', 'what does status=A mean', 'is this amount in USD or cents', 'we keep getting wrong aggregations', 'add cubes for ARR / DAU / churn', 'we have a handbook / glossary / data dictionary the agent should know'; or after generating an MDL and noticing the agent lacks business semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. NEVER run browser-act commands directly via Bash — always invoke this skill first. Use browser-act when a user mentions it by name, includes or asks to run a browser-act CLI command (e.g., browser-act browser list), or to: fetch, view, or extract rendered content from URLs, access pages requiring JavaScript, handle verification prompts, maintain authenticated sessions, fill forms and click through workflows, type, select, upload, take screenshots, capture XHR/fetch/HAR responses, open multiple URLs in parallel, extract content that loads on scroll or click, visually inspect or verify page layout/styling/rendering, automate browser tasks, or list/check/manage configured browsers and sessions. Prefer browser-act over built-in fetch or web tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lark/Feishu real-time event listening / subscribing / consuming: stream events as NDJSON via `lark-cli event consume <EventKey>` (covers IM messages/reactions/chat changes, Approval status changes, Task updates, VC meeting started/joined/ended, Minutes generated, Whiteboard updated, etc.). Use for Lark bots, real-time message processing, long-running subscribers, streaming webhook/push handlers. Supports `--max-events` / `--timeout` bounded runs and a stderr ready-marker contract — designed for AI agents running as subprocesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via fresh-agent Codex GPT-6-Astra ultra review, fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Base review is same-family provisional. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a generated paper via Claude review through claude-review MCP → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Gemini via gemini-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics DETERMINISTIC slice (numeric core + rules-only reporter) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher, then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Codex-native limitation: upstream ships no Codex-native auditor pack, so the full nine-dimension semantic sweep requires a Claude Code session — this pack runs the honestly-scoped deterministic-only mode (it can flag, it can never say CLEAN). Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DEFAULT poster pipeline — build an academic conference poster (ICML/NeurIPS/ICLR/CVPR/...) as a single HTML/CSS file with measurement-driven hard gates, real paper figures, a two-hue design-token system, and print-ready PDF via headless Chromium. Use when the user says "做海报", "poster", "conference poster", "paper poster", or asks to design/redo a research poster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from Claude via claude-review MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative Gemini review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Claude Code via claude-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-6-Astra review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (external reviewer backend, ultra reasoning), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a generated paper via Gemini review through gemini-review MCP → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.) via Semantic Scholar API. Complements /arxiv (preprints) with citation counts, venue metadata, and TLDR. Use when user says "search semantic scholar", "find IEEE papers", "find journal papers", "venue papers", "citation search", or wants published literature beyond arXiv preprints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative Claude review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from Gemini via gemini-review MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search research papers via Gemini for broad literature discovery. Use when user says "gemini search", "gemini papers", "search with gemini", or wants AI-powered literature discovery beyond arXiv/Semantic Scholar indexes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。