「deep」の検索結果

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optimization via DefaultItemExcludes, import chain analysis with /pp preprocessing. DO NOT USE FOR: compilation-time slowness (use build-perf-diagnostics), incremental build issues (use incremental-build), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and OllamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only — never modifies code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only -- never modifies code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic exploratory data analysis. Activate when a dataset needs profiling — structure check, nulls, outliers, distributions, correlations — before deeper analysis begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将 dependency-cruiser 接入 TypeScript 仓库，使每个 package 都是一个深度模块：实现隐藏在子文件夹中，只能通过入口点文件访问。由用户调用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

深度研究代理系统社区版，对复杂主题进行多轮迭代的网络搜索和综合分析。使用场景：当用户需要对特定主题进行深入、全面的研究时，特别是需要基于最新网络信息生成详细分析报告的情况。支持多轮迭代搜索、智能搜索方向调整和综合分析报告生成。本skill是一个工作流描述文档，没有执行脚本，依赖byted-web-search skill进行网页搜索。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

专门用于将 Excel (.xlsx, .xls) 和 CSV (.csv) 文件转换为高度格式化的 Markdown 文档。 该工具具有内置的结构解析逻辑，能够自动识别表头、合并单元格并优化长文本换行。 当用户需要将表格数据转化为文档报告或在 Markdown 环境中展示数据时，**必须优先调用此工具**，以确保格式的准确性和视觉上的专业性，避免普通代码分析产生的格式错乱。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when performing web research beyond a simple single search -- looking into topics, comparing options, investigating questions, finding recommendations, or any task where effective use of Exa, Firecrawl, and Reddit tools matters. Triggers on "research", "look into", "investigate", "compare", "find out about", "search for", "find information", "what do people think about", "what are the best", "look up", or multi-source search tasks. Also invocable explicitly by deep-research team members via the Skill tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

中国互联网品牌感知监测统一工具。聚合全网热榜追踪（hub）、小红书/抖音/公众号近30天深度讨论研究（cn30）、豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek AI 搜索品牌可见度分析（geo）三个互补模块，帮助品牌方/市场运营/内容创作者从「话题热度—真实口碑—AI 回答」三层视角全面感知品牌。当用户需要研究中国社交媒体热点、分析品牌舆情、对比竞品口碑、分析品牌在 AI 搜索中的表现、做 GEO 优化、追踪全网热点时使用。触发词：品牌感知、舆情监测、社媒研究、热榜聚合、AI 搜索可见度、GEO 分析、跨平台舆情、热点追踪、品牌口碑、品牌竞品对比、社媒热榜。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GEO（生成式引擎优化）品牌分析工具。自动向豆包、Kimi、DeepSeek、元宝、千问、百度 六个 AI 搜索引擎提问，分析品牌在 AI 回答中的出现率、情绪、信源引用、竞品对比，生成交互式 HTML 报告。当用户需要分析品牌在 AI 搜索引擎中的表现、GEO 优化、AI 搜索品牌监测、品牌 AI 可见度分析时使用。触发词：GEO分析、品牌AI搜索分析、AI搜索引擎优化、品牌可见度、GEO、geo analyzer。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate complex, long-running tasks to Manus AI agent for autonomous execution. Use when user says 'use manus', 'delegate to manus', 'send to manus', 'have manus do', 'ask manus', 'check manus sessions', or when tasks require deep web research, market analysis, product comparisons, stock analysis, competitive research, document generation, data analysis, or multi-step workflows that benefit from autonomous agent execution with parallel processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

【深度调研专用】当需要系统性调研、多产品对比、深度分析、技术选型、趋势分析时必须使用本技能。触发关键词：调研、对比、分析、评估、选型、趋势、综合报告、多源验证。通过 3 层深度搜索（阅读多个网页）+ 多源交叉验证，提供比普通 WebSearch 更全面、更准确的研究结果和深度洞察。禁止用普通搜索工具替代深度调研任务。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing binary structure, disassembling code, or decompiling functions. Deep static analysis via radare2 (r2) and Ghidra headless - function enumeration, cross-references (xrefs), decompilation, control flow graphs. Keywords - "disassemble", "decompile", "what does this function do", "find functions", "analyze code", "r2", "ghidra", "pdg", "afl"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quickly search and navigate the codebase - Use when you need to quickly find files, search for patterns, or locate specific code without deep analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit cryptography implementation — algorithm choice, key sizes, KDF parameters, IV/nonce handling, signature verification, randomness, TLS configuration, and key rotation. Deeper than owasp-audit A02. Use when the user mentions 'crypto review,' 'cryptography audit,' 'encryption review,' 'KDF,' 'PBKDF2,' 'Argon2,' 'bcrypt cost,' 'IV reuse,' 'nonce reuse,' 'AES mode,' 'AES-GCM,' 'AES-ECB,' 'signature verification,' 'TLS configuration,' 'cipher suites,' 'key rotation,' 'libsodium,' 'BoringSSL,' or 'is this crypto right.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-flight checklist for long-running ML training jobs covering config diff, run naming, path verification, monitoring setup, and restart-cleanup. Use when the user asks to launch, kick off, start, restart, or kill a training run, or mentions launching a multi-hour or multi-day GPU job (python train, accelerate launch, torchrun, deepspeed, sbatch, tmux training).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user to deeply understand a change through interactive tutoring: restating understanding, drilling into why/what/how, and quizzing until mastery. The active counterpart to a one-shot explanation. Use when the user asks to "understand this change", "teach me this change", "help me understand what changed", "walk me through this change", "make sure I understand this", "quiz me on this", or "teach me what we did".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep security review of a Convex app: authorization model, data access paths per table, HTTP action exposure, rate limiting, file storage access, scheduled function trust, and a written findings report. Use before launch, after an incident, or when the user asks for a full audit rather than a quick check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。