「ida」の検索結果

Validate content structure against a schema: sections, word counts. "scan for leftover placeholders"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the Part 5 client validation document: evidence-cited findings for client decisions. "prepare v1 findings for client review"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate custom Claude Code slash commands through intelligent 5-7 question flow. Creates powerful commands for business research, content analysis, healthcare compliance, API integration, documentation automation, and workflow optimization. Outputs organized commands to generated-commands/ with validation and installation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or improving Claude Code agents. Expert guidance on agent file structure, frontmatter, persona definition, tool access, model selection, and validation against schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing agent-relay workflows that must fully validate features end-to-end before merging. Covers the 80-to-100 pattern - going beyond "code compiles" to "feature works, tested E2E locally." Includes repair-before-failure validation gates, review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, PGlite for in-memory Postgres testing, mock sandbox patterns, test-fix-rerun loops, verify gates after every edit, and the full lifecycle from implementation through passing tests to commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has changed a prompt (system prompt, RAG template, agent instruction, etc.) and wants to know whether the candidate is better or worse than the baseline. Also use when the user mentions prompt A/B testing, prompt comparison, prompt optimization validation, "did my prompt change help," or prompt regression testing. Outputs per-dimension win rates with statistical significance using OpenJudge PairwiseAnalyzer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stage exploration before instruction on complex problems. The learner produces two attempted approaches before consolidation — which builds on those attempts, not from scratch. Use for genuinely hard problems where struggle produces deeper learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retires July 28, 2026. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to pressure-test a potential new business, product, or side project against the serial-founder filter. Not "marketing ideas for a product" (that's marketing-skills:marketing-ideas) — this is "should this business exist + can you win it." Runs the idea through a structured framework (problem, audience, wedge, monetization, moat, portfolio fit, distribution, energy fit, opportunity cost), checks domain availability via /domain, optionally triggers /deep-research for market validation, and outputs a viability brief: build / sleep on it / pass. Archives every idea to ~/.config/makerskills/business-brainstorm/archive/ so past work is searchable. Triggers on "/business-brainstorm," "/brainstorm," "new business idea," "should I build X," "pressure test this idea," "validate this idea," "is X a good business," "what about a [type] for [audience]."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a project's infrastructure and SaaS stack, then produce a cost report showing what the user currently pays and what they would save by consolidating onto Temps (self-hosted or Temps Cloud). Detects hosting platforms (Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Render, Heroku, Fly.io), analytics (PostHog, Plausible, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Fathom), error tracking (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Honeybadger), session replay (LogRocket, FullStory, Hotjar, Highlight), uptime monitoring (Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, Checkly), managed databases (Supabase, Neon, PlanetScale, MongoDB Atlas, Upstash, RDS), and transactional email (SendGrid, Postmark, Resend, Mailgun) from dependencies, config files, and env var names. Use when the user wants to: (1) Know how much they would save by switching to Temps, (2) Audit their SaaS/infrastructure spend, (3) Compare their current stack's cost against self-hosting, (4) Decide whether Temps is worth it, (5) Build a business case for consolidating tools. Triggers: "how much would I save", "temps savings", "cost comparison", "audit my stack", "am I overpaying", "saas spend", "calculate savings", "is temps cheaper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze existing XML sitemaps or generate new ones with industry templates. Validates format, URLs, and structure. Use when user says "sitemap", "generate sitemap", "sitemap issues", or "XML sitemap".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect, validate, and generate Schema.org structured data. JSON-LD format preferred. Use when user says "schema", "structured data", "rich results", "JSON-LD", or "markup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic SEO planning for new or existing websites. Industry-specific templates, competitive analysis, content strategy, and implementation roadmap. Use when user says "SEO plan", "SEO strategy", "SEO planning", "SEO best practices for <topic>", "content strategy", "keyword strategy", "content calendar", "site architecture", "SEO roadmap", or asks for organic growth guidance without a specific URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E-commerce SEO analysis: Google Shopping visibility, Amazon marketplace intelligence, product schema validation, competitor pricing analysis, and marketplace keyword gaps. Combines on-page product SEO with marketplace data from DataForSEO Merchant API. Use when user says "ecommerce SEO", "product SEO", "Google Shopping", "marketplace SEO", "product schema", "Amazon SEO", "product listings", "shopping ads", or "merchant SEO".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an app idea into validated, App-Store-ready name candidates. Use when the user says "name my app", "what should I call it", "app name ideas", "help me name this app", "is this name available", or needs to pick a brandable, ownable name before reserving it in App Store Connect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal document generation and compliance guidance for indie Apple developers. Covers privacy policies, terms of service, EULAs, GDPR/CCPA/DPDP compliance, and Apple App Store legal requirements. Use when user needs legal documents or compliance guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for writing, optimizing, and benchmarking Triton kernels for Intel XPU GPUs (Battlemage/Arc Pro B50) using the Xe-Forge optimization framework. Includes an LLM-driven trial-loop workflow (analyze, validate, benchmark, profile, finalize), XPU-specific patterns (tensor descriptors, GRF mode, tile swizzling), KernelBench fused kernels, and Flash Attention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive product research and opportunity analysis for Amazon sellers. Analyzes demand, competition, profit potential, market entry barriers, and validates product ideas. Covers product sourcing, pricing strategy, and go-to-market planning. Use when the user asks about researching a product to sell, validating product ideas, product opportunity analysis, market research for Amazon, competition analysis, profit potential, should I sell this product, product viability, or any general product research questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use real run evidence, validation failures, source drift, platform drift, and user feedback to plan and, only after explicit approval, apply structural upgrades to an existing skill. Use when the user asks to improve an existing skill from recent runs, recurring failures, outdated sources, excessive bloat, changed platform behavior, or validated workflow feedback. Do not use to create a brand-new skill or to execute the business workflow itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and constrain untrusted input at the boundary. Use on any handler that accepts external data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework. Use when planning user interviews, getting product feedback, validating ideas, designing discovery questions, or extracting honest signal from biased customer responses. Covers good vs bad questions, deflecting compliments, anchoring fluff, pressing for commitment, and customer slicing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。