2,169 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Calculate comprehensive ROI for AI implementation projects. Takes current costs, manual process time, team size, and hourly rates. Generates detailed roi-analysis.md with executive summary, cost-benefit tables, sensitivity analysis, break-even timeline, and comparison scenarios. Use when evaluating AI investments, building business cases, or justifying automation spend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TAM/SAM/SOM calculator with deep market research. Produces comprehensive market-sizing.md with top-down and bottom-up estimates, methodology, data sources, assumptions, sensitivity ranges, growth projections, competitive landscape, and Mermaid visualizations. Use when user needs market size estimates, addressable market analysis, go-to-market sizing, investor-ready market analysis, or business plan market validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create timelines for house down payment, retirement, college fund. Monthly savings targets, investment strategies, milestone tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare YOUR data room for a fundraise, acquisition, or bank diligence -- builds the checklist for your deal stage, sweeps your folders for what you already have, produces a gap report, and organizes everything into the structure buyers and investors expect. The sell-side complement to cowork-deal-room.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates professional board meeting presentation content (board-deck.md) with executive summary, financials, product updates, GTM metrics, team/hiring, strategic decisions, and appendix. Supports early-stage, growth-stage, and pre-IPO formats. Use when preparing board meeting materials, quarterly board updates, or investor presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The on-call triage procedure for checkout-api. Use whenever you are asked to investigate elevated errors, elevated latency, or a suspected regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunts bugs with evidence trails. Use when investigating unexpected behavior or before merging code with potential hidden defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and record project memory (Discussions, journal, ADRs). Use before re-investigating anything. Do not use for settled battles; see failure-archaeology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to organize finances, create a budget, plan debt payoff, build savings goals, audit subscriptions, or do any personal money management task. Triggers on "budget", "finances", "savings", "debt", "subscriptions", "emergency fund", "investing", "cash flow", "money system", "financial plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vulnerability-research loop toward a novel CVE. Target triage -> attack-surface map -> ranked hypotheses -> investigate (RE / fuzz / audit) -> a finding deepens the loop, a dead-end pivots to a new approach. Uses the full wiki + hunt skillset. Scaffolds and persists state under raw/research/<project>/. Triggers - "research", "find a cve", "analyze this binary/library", "audit this code for vulns".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "research", "fact-check", "check the history", "is this accurate", "research notes", "sources", "historical accuracy", "technical accuracy", "how would this really work", "verify a detail", "interview an expert", "plan a site visit", "expert review", or needs to investigate and record the real-world facts a story relies on and the chapters that use them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans an architecture-driven change to code that already exists: module boundaries, type responsibilities, layering, coupling, and the public surface a revision moves. Produces a buildable change plan that names the types, modules, and methods involved and records the surface delta each change makes. Use when the user wants to plan, scope, or sequence a restructure, extraction, split, consolidation, responsibility shift, or API revision of existing code, including "these responsibilities are wrong, plan the fix". Does not assess an area and stop at findings — use architectural-analysis. Does not specify new behavior — use plan-a-feature. Does not diagnose a bug — use investigate. Does not write the code — use refactor to restructure it or tdd to build it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate how a concept, code path, application, network flow, system, incident, document, or local artifact actually works, then deliver a two-depth visual HTML explainer with a dead-simple big-picture first layer and source-backed technical depth behind it. Use when the user invokes $xray, asks how something works under the hood, wants a module or app behavior traced across boundaries, requests web, code, network, or safe static artifact research before explanation, or asks for an evidence-backed explainer. Do not use for answer-only definitions, general web design, full codebase audits, or invasive binary reverse engineering without explicit authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track and analyze cross-border capital flows between mainland China and Hong Kong via Stock Connect (沪港通/深港通). Monitor northbound (北向资金) and southbound (南向资金) flows, identify trending stocks, and analyze institutional positioning. Use when user asks about 北向资金, 南向资金, 外资动向, Stock Connect flows, or cross-border investment trends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
スタンレー・ドラッケンミラーの投資哲学と戦略に基づいた投資アドバイスを提供。30年間無敗、年率30%近いリターンを達成した伝説的投資家の思考法を活用し、マクロ経済分析、リスク管理、ポジション構築、市場サイクルの読み方などについて実践的な指導を行う。投資判断、市場分析、リスク管理、ポートフォリオ構築などの相談時に使用。