「only」の検索結果

Submit compact IPD REST requests for HLA allele and cell-level metadata using the public IPD query API. Use when a user wants concise IPD summaries; save raw JSON or text only on request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submit compact Human Protein Atlas requests for gene JSON, search downloads, and page-level tissue or cell-line lookups. Use when a user wants concise Human Protein Atlas summaries; save raw JSON or HTML only on request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submit, poll, and summarize NCBI BLAST Common URL API jobs (Blast.cgi) for nucleotide or protein sequences. Use when a user wants RID status, BLAST results, or compact top-hit summaries; fetch raw Text/JSON2 only on request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean up Dropbox content by identifying obsolete, duplicate, temporary, or unwanted files and deleting only after explicit review. Use when the user explicitly asks to delete, remove, or clean up Dropbox files or folders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a validated Data Analytics report or dashboard artifact through Sites. Use automatically for durable artifacts in any positively identified Work Mode when the full Sites lifecycle is callable, or in ChatGPT Desktop outside Work Mode only after an explicit Sites request or acceptance of the optional post-handoff sharing offer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Share Dropbox files or folders by creating shared links, inspecting existing shared links, or explaining current shared-link state. Use only when the user explicitly asks to create a shared link, check access, or inspect a Dropbox shared link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, lay out, critique, and explain data visualizations. Use when the user asks what visualization fits a dataset or goal, how a chart, dashboard, operational workspace, UML-like diagram, or software architecture diagram should be composed or interacted with, asks for visual page design, a layout mockup, generated large-screen and mobile concept images, or to be shown what a visualization could look like, when domain-native contextual surfaces or graphical backgrounds may help, when scrollytelling or parallax might be appropriate, wants a critique of an existing visualization, or needs guidance grounded in trusted visualization theory and practice. For advanced visual design or page-layout prompts where composition affects understanding, Codex must generate and show both large-screen and mobile portrait image concepts before implementation or text-only design handoff, plus mobile landscape when needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a Canva design and return structured, actionable design feedback — visual hierarchy, copy/messaging, layout & spacing, consistency, readability, and accessibility. Read-only; makes no changes to the design. Use when the user asks to "review my design", "give me feedback on this", "critique my deck/poster/flyer", "how can I improve this design", or "what's wrong with this slide".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess an immutable patch artifact's program impact, regression risk, and auto-merge eligibility. Use for generated patch files, provider pull-request diffs, or commit ranges when reviewers need evidence about affected runtime paths, contracts, tests, and recoverability. This skill is read-only and does not generate, edit, apply, push, or merge the patch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a Canva design against a brand kit and report where it diverges — off-palette colors, non-brand fonts, logo misuse, and off-tone copy. Read-only; makes no changes. Use when the user asks "is this on brand", "check this against our brand kit", "do a brand review", "does this match our brand guidelines", or "brand-check my design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create any visual design using Adobe Express templates — flyers, posters, social media posts (Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn), business cards, invitations, greeting cards, resumes, cover letters, brochures, newsletters, certificates, presentations, YouTube thumbnails, email headers, logos, menus, and labels. Use this skill whenever the user wants to make, design, or build any visual — even if they just say "make me a flyer", "design a poster", "I need something for Instagram", "create an event invite", or "make a business card". Also handles browsing templates, editing text, replacing images, changing backgrounds, animating, and exporting designs. Access: 🔐 Signed-In required | Gen AI: ❌ by default — image replacement only where the surface permits generative AI (e.g. Codex); none on Claude

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare macOS packaging and notarization workflows. Use when archiving apps, validating bundles, or explaining distribution-only failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scheduled delta monitoring against a prior competitive snapshot. Use when tracking competitors on a cadence: material shifts only, cited evidence, battle-card update flags, runs unattended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect Sentry issues, summarize production errors, and pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only). Use when user says "check Sentry", "what errors in production?", "summarize Sentry issues", "recent crashes", or "production error report". Requires SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN. Do NOT use for setting up Sentry SDK, configuring alerts, or non-Sentry error monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior React Native and Expo engineer for building production-ready cross-platform mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, implementing navigation with Expo Router, optimizing list and scroll performance, working with animations via Reanimated, handling platform-specific code (iOS/Android), integrating native modules, or structuring Expo projects. Triggers on React Native, Expo, mobile app, iOS app, Android app, cross-platform, native module, FlatList, FlashList, LegendList, Reanimated, Expo Router, mobile performance, app store. Do NOT use for Flutter, web-only React, or backend Node.js tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides design and implementation of evolutionary modular-monolith platforms with DDD (strategic + tactical), flat-by-aggregate organization, an Anti-Corruption Layer for vendor independence, a transactional outbox for events, smart resilience (backoff with jitter, circuit breakers, idempotency), and a polished architecture HTML document with elegant SVG diagrams. Use when designing a platform or backend, defining bounded contexts, organizing modules and folders, choosing monolith vs microservices, decoupling from an external service (ERP, storage, AI), making calls resilient, adding real-time push, picking a 2026 TypeScript stack (Nx, NestJS, React), or producing an architecture document or diagram. Also triggers on 'modular monolith', 'bounded contexts', 'flat-by-aggregate', 'ports and adapters', 'architecture diagram'. Do NOT use for simple CRUD, NestJS-only deep implementation (use nestjs-modular-monolith), or pure domain-model review (use tactical-ddd).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores how completely an implementation fulfills a PRD/spec, case by case, and produces a single comparable final grade. Invoke only when explicitly named (e.g. run spec-driven-eval); do not auto-trigger. Use when benchmarking spec-driven implementations, grading acceptance criteria, evaluating whether a feature was 100% implemented, comparing multiple implementations of the same PRD, or auditing implementation and test coverage (unit and e2e) against product requirements. Do NOT use for planning or building features (use tlc-spec-driven), writing PRDs, or general code review unrelated to a spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous senior-operator mode for AI agents that resolve tasks end to end without babysitting and never create new problems. The agent verifies every claim against real evidence (web search dated to the current month and year, the codebase, and available tools, MCPs, and CLIs); it never guesses, never fakes confidence, and never claims something is done without proof. It stays silent and keeps working, interrupting the user only on three stops, namely a destructive or irreversible action, a dead-end with no evidence after exhausting sources, or genuine ambiguity that changes the outcome. Output is short, literal, and human. Use when the user says "not-your-babysitter", "nanny mode", "work autonomously", "stop babysitting", or "no hand-holding", or wants an agent that solves problems on its own, especially hands-on engineering and operational tasks. Do not use when the user explicitly wants a tutorial, a verbose walkthrough, or open-ended brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, stress test assumptions, audit evidence quality, or find blind spots before committing. Do NOT use for building plans, making decisions, or generating solutions — this skill only challenges and critiques. For a multi-agent panel that challenges and then commits to a verdict, use the-jury.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated Rails conventions: rich models, concerns, CRUD-everything, state-as-records, minimal dependencies, Minitest with fixtures. Load this skill BEFORE any code-level thinking, not only before editing a file. It is required the moment a task touches Rails code in ANY way: designing or even just discussing a data model, schema, migration, entity, association, field, validation, class, or method name; writing, planning, reviewing, analyzing, testing, debugging, or refactoring; or proposing any model, table, column, route, or code snippet inline in chat. If you are about to name a model or sketch a column you are already in scope, even in an exploratory back-and-forth where no file is written yet. Do not let a "we're just discussing" framing defer it. Do NOT use for non-Rails backends, NestJS, or general architecture (use nestjs-modular-monolith or coding-guidelines).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a sequenced monolith-to-modular pipeline that sizes and inventories components, finds shared domain duplication, addresses flattening and hierarchy issues, analyzes coupling, then groups components into candidate domain-aligned units, with optional embedded DDD strategic analysis for bounded contexts. Use when asking how to split a monolith, size components before extraction, find duplicated domain logic, clean up module hierarchy, measure coupling between modules, or group components into services. Do NOT use for phased extraction roadmaps or prioritization without the prior analysis steps (use decomposition-planning-roadmap after this pipeline), end-to-end legacy migration strategy writeups (use legacy-migration-planner), pure infrastructure capacity sizing, or when you only need DDD without the structural pipeline (install domain-analysis standalone).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。