1,401 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when creating or editing a persona in src/agent-src/personas/ — voice / focus / unique questions / output expectations — even when the user just says 'add a reviewer voice for X'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine a persona from recent corrections — tightens its Unique Questions, governance-gated; explicit request only. Skill analog → skill-improvement-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing Eloquent models, relationships, scopes, or queries via Model:: — 'fetch users with their orders'. NOT for PHPStan output, non-Eloquent services, or raw SQL questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route codebase-structure questions (who calls X, where used, change-impact) to an existing code-graph first: impact, tests-for, dead cheaper, never more precise; grep routine. Also 'call graph'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Boot the explicitly selected CLI(s) as the human's concierge: a project-aware side channel that sits ABOVE the running agent system in a shared writable terminal. It answers status questions and handles the human's ad hoc tasking while the working agents collaborate on the mesh — it is not a worker, manager, or gatekeeper, and team progress never waits for it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select and confirm an overnight or long-running unattended collaboration topology. Use only for a requested unattended run, not ordinary questions or short tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Planning] Use when you need to validate a plan with critical questions interview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Utilities] Use when you need to answer technical and architectural questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve the current system date and time to anchor the agent in present reality. Use for questions involving today, current time, recent events, or information newer than the model's training data to prevent knowledge-cutoff errors and fictionalization of real facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update an existing GitHub Issue's description based on the issue number. Reads all issue comments and reflects any items not yet captured in the description. After refreshing the description, reviews it for remaining ambiguities or unclear requirements and posts any open questions as a follow-up 確認事項 comment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a GitHub issue that already has the cc-issue-created label and is assumed to be ready to start. First inspect the comment history to decide whether human confirmation is needed (cc-need-human-check, highest priority); otherwise decide whether the issue should be closed as not needed, unanswered confirmation items remain (cc-answer-issue-questions), the description is stale relative to settled comment-history content and must be refreshed before execution (cc-update-issue), or it can move to execution (cc-exec-issue). Dependency checks are out of scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub Issueの確認事項に対して、コードベースやドキュメントを徹底的に調査し、根拠に基づいた回答を提供するスキル。Issueの最後のコメントに含まれる確認事項を調査・回答し、コメントに追記する。
Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use FIRST when user requests any disease market sizing report (e.g. "做 X 市场调研" / "Run market sizing for X"). Elicits 4-6 startup questions (evidence window, geography, international comparison, report depth, user role) and writes .cache/<slug>/contract.json. ALWAYS invoke before disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Validates against schemas/contract.schema.json.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. Use it proactively when an existing skill could be a ready-made building block, while keeping installation scoped to the current project unless the user explicitly requests a global install.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack plan-tune method for calibrating how many questions to ask, autonomy level, stop conditions, and decision style for a workstream or user preference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Efficiently extract and convert the contents of any local file—such as PDF, DOCX, DOC, ODT, RTF, XLSX, XLS, or HTML—into clean, well-formatted markdown saved to disk. Use this skill whenever the user requests to parse, read, or extract information from a file on their computer, including phrases like “parse this PDF”, “convert this document”, “read this file”, “extract text from”, or when a local file path (not a URL) is provided. This skill offers advanced options like generating AI-powered summaries and answering questions based on the file's content. Prefer this tool over `scrape` when handling local files to deliver precise, structured outputs for downstream tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search an index built for coding agents — GitHub issues, merged pull requests, repository READMEs, and curated documentation sites — and get back the matched passages, not just links. Use this skill whenever the question is about code: how a library, framework, or API behaves, what an error message or stack trace means, whether a bug was reported or fixed, what a function returns, what a default is, or which repos do a given thing. Triggers on "why does <library> do X", "what does this error mean", "is this a known bug", "how do I use <library>", "what's the API for", pasted stack traces, and pasted error strings. Prefer this over a general web search for programming questions — it answers from the primary source instead of a blog post about it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategy cascade based on Roger Martin and A.G. Lafley's Playing to Win framework. Five interconnected choices that define a real strategy — not a vision statement, not a list of priorities, not a strategic plan that's really just a budget with adjectives. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for building or rebuilding the full cascade, Review for pressure-testing an existing one, and Alert Triggers for defining the tripwires that tell you the cascade is breaking. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategy, strategic choices, winning aspiration, where to play, how to win, competitive strategy, or when someone says "we need a strategy" and means it. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。