2,877 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Turn a product release (the list of shipped items plus real screen recordings) into a motion recap video and one explained demo per feature, with sound effects tied to on-screen motion and a composed music bed. Use when asked for a release video, a changelog video, a feature recap reel, or demo clips for release notes and docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed documentation before it ships — READMEs, API references, docstrings, PHPDoc/JSDoc, changelogs, tutorials, and doc sites. Best used reactively after an agent writes or edits docs, after code changes documented behavior, or before publishing docs. Use when the user says 'review the docs', 'is this documentation accurate', 'update the docs', 'write a README', 'document this API', 'add a docstring', or 'add a changelog entry'. Core job: verify every referenced function, flag, endpoint, config key, and code sample against the source; catch docs-vs-code drift; strip filler and unverifiable claims. DO NOT USE for production code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), marketing copy or blog posts, prose style editing of non-technical writing, or documentation site theming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed test code against universal testing rules before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, generates, or refactors tests, before presenting, committing, or merging them. Use for pytest (test_*.py, *_test.py), PHPUnit/Pest (*Test.php), Jest/Vitest (*.test.ts, *.spec.js), Go (*_test.go), files under tests/, __tests__/, or spec/, and review requests like 'write tests for X', 'add tests', 'test this', 'review these tests', or PR diffs containing tests. Can also guide test writing when explicitly invoked before the work. This skill is the quality gate that prevents AI-generated test bloat. DO NOT USE for production or implementation code review (use clean-code-guard), CI or test-runner configuration, running or debugging tests, or general architecture discussion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building exhibits for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript — photographs, maps, site plans, artifact images, kinship diagrams, transcripts, evidence tables, and multimodal media — so they are self-contained, accessible (alt text), ethically cleared (consent, permissions), and count toward the word budget. Designs exhibits; it does not run analysis or clear permissions for you.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits American Anthropologist (AA) and which section to target. AA is the four-field AAA flagship, so the test is significance across anthropology (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the question and pick a section; it does not collect data or conduct fieldwork.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) via the AEA submission system — membership-scaled fee, JEL codes, PDF and length rules, ≤100-word abstract, disclosure statements, and data/code readiness. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing and applying a theory-construction method for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — building constructs, defining their domain, specifying relationships, articulating the underlying logic/mechanisms, and setting boundary conditions. This is the THEORY-CONSTRUCTION craft, NOT empirical method; AMR publishes no datasets, no measures, and no statistical tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building the actual theory for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — turning a positioned puzzle into defined constructs, explicit relationships, propositions, and boundary conditions. Constructs the theory; it does NOT stress-test the argument's logic (that is amr-data-analysis) or design any data collection (AMR has none).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find Twitter/X influencers to promote a product or brand. Use when asked to find influencers, discover Twitter accounts for partnerships, identify creators in a niche, or build an influencer outreach list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, or Rumble transcripts into timestamped hooks, claims, objections, proof, calls to action, sponsorship signals, and reusable content atoms. Use directly for transcript analysis or as support for creator, competitor, trend, demand, and repurposing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stitch video segments with ffmpeg concat, xfade, overlay, audio mux, and export settings, and trim a source into named clips at exact windows (trim_clips.py). Ships montage.py, a free montage assembler (python3 + ffmpeg, no keys). It takes a JSON EDL of clips and stills, normalizes them and hard-cuts them in order, burns captions from an SRT, a cue list or word timings, and lays a VO over a music bed that ducks under it, mastered to -14 LUFS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate whether a creator, influencer, or brand account reaches the right audience using public profile, aggregate demographic, geography, language, content, comment, and commerce signals. Use for creator comparisons, sponsorship fit, market fit, and audience-quality research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handles disqualified and near-miss inbound leads gracefully. Drafts polite rejection emails, referral requests (right company wrong person), and nurture routing (future fit). Ensures no inbound lead gets ignored and every disqualification preserves the relationship. Tool-agnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualifies inbound leads against full ICP criteria — company size, industry, use case fit, role/seniority of the person. Checks CRM and existing customer base for duplicates and existing relationships. Outputs a scored CSV with qualification status, reasoning, and pipeline overlap flags. Tool-agnostic — works with any CRM, enrichment tool, or data source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fills in missing data for inbound leads — researches the company, identifies the person's role and seniority, finds other stakeholders at the company, checks for existing CRM relationships, and updates the lead record. Produces enriched lead data ready for qualification or outreach. Tool-agnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end champion/buyer/user job change signal composite. Takes a set of known people (past buyers, champions, power users), detects when they move to a new company, researches the new company for ICP fit, and drafts personalized outreach leveraging the existing relationship. Tool-agnostic — works with any people source, detection method, and outreach platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive GTM analysis of any target company. Researches what a company is currently doing across all go-to-market dimensions — content/blog, founder LinkedIn activity, SEO/traffic, hiring signals, social/community presence, customer acquisition channels, podcast appearances, review sites, competitive positioning, and partnerships. Produces a structured report identifying what's working, what's missing, and where white space exists for new strategies. Use before designing GTM strategies for a client or prospect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover newsletters in a target niche relevant to your ICP, evaluate audience fit, estimate reach and CPM, and output a ranked shortlist of sponsorship opportunities. Uses web search to find newsletters, then scores each against ICP alignment criteria. Use when a marketing team wants to reach an existing engaged audience for less than the cost of building their own, or when testing a new channel before committing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QC gate for a generated static ad image — verify the file opens, matches the requested dimensions, shows the correct product/subject (right shape, colour, label, logo), and has no garbled text or severe artifacts. Records pass/fail/needs-human in verification.md. Used as the final check in the static ad remix flow before shipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a 3D-CGI app sizzle — nano-banana CGI plates (blank-glow floating phone + a CGI studio with rim-light + placeholder burst shapes; studio look and phone finish come from the recipe choices) plus PIL compositing of the REAL App Store screenshots onto the bezel + burst-out overlays, driven by Kling 3.0 i2v steady-float per beat with a per-beat Ken-Burns FFmpeg push-in fallback when Kling garbles the UI, then VO/music mix (sidechain duck, loudnorm) + 1.15x speed + anti-AI grain finalize. The on-screen UI, any faces in it, and the wordmark are ALWAYS real assets composited via PIL — never AI-rendered. The paid steps (plates, i2v clips, VO, music) are separate capabilities; this ships the config + PIPELINE + FREE assembly and the recipe orchestrates the spend. Use for the cgi-app-sizzle video format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render the logo-equation card ad (7s, 9:16) — partner icon + brand icon joined by a plus sign as an equation, a two-line "= outcome" headline, four numbered steps, and a CTA that hard-cuts in at 2s, on a static black card over timelapse b-roll, no voice. render_card.py draws the two card plates with measured geometry and hard guardrails (the user must confirm the integration is real, no partnership/endorsement/ranking words, no comment-bait CTA, no dashes); compose.py lays the card over the b-roll sped up to read as a timelapse, with an optional bed; measure_motion.py gates the b-roll (a real-time shot reads as a photo). Free, local.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a premium 3D product-showcase ad from a config — four beat clips (an orbiting hero rotation, a macro push-in, a physics reveal, a typographic close) normalized to the chosen backdrop colour, hard-concatenated in order, closed on a deterministic Playwright brand end card, and mixed under one instrumental bed at loudnorm I=-16 (music-only, no VO). Ships the runnable build_endcard.py + build_masters.py; the rotation/macro clips are create-video-fal i2v seeded on a create-image-fal styled hero, the reveal is Veo3 i2v, and the bed is create-music-elevenlabs. Use for the 3d-product-showcase format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble the FREE steps of the flat-vector-explainer video format — a flat-illustration host character (who, where, tone, voice and music come from the recipe choices) walks a countable N-step product routine, one step per beat, and Remotion composites every chip/numeral/tagline/slate/CTA as an animated DOM overlay ON TOP of the Kling i2v character clips (text is NEVER baked into a keyframe — i2v warps type), the closing 'N products' grid is a PIL composite of the REAL product photos (not AI), full-sentence VO drives word-by-word burned captions over a VO-forward music bed, and the ~50s animated silent master is re-cut to a 30s deliverable FROM the animated master (never a static intermediate). Documentation-grade — ships config.example.json + PIPELINE.md + a README of the free assembly; the paid gen steps (keyframes, Kling i2v, VO, music) are separate capabilities the recipe orchestrates. Use for the flat-vector-explainer format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。