3,137 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Edit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed WooCommerce code — extensions, payment and shipping integrations, checkout customizations, and order/product logic — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WooCommerce APIs: wc_get_order, wc_get_orders, wc_get_product, WC() cart or session, woocommerce_* hooks, Store API endpoints, payment gateways, order or product meta, HPOS, subscriptions, or bookings. Use on 'review this Woo plugin', 'is this HPOS compatible', or after tasks like 'write a WooCommerce extension', 'add a checkout field', 'hook into the order flow', or 'update stock'. Enforces HPOS-safe order access, CRUD over direct meta, feature-compatibility declarations, server-side checkout validation, money-handling discipline, and hooks over template overrides. DO NOT USE for WordPress code without WooCommerce APIs (use wp-guard), generic code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), or store configuration and admin-screen questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and trade-off framing. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round. Drafts a concise, decisive response and revision plan; it does not redo the analysis (see aeri-robustness / aeri-identification).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting or revising the prose of an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript — especially the abstract and introduction — to translate causal estimates into a clear policy takeaway without overclaiming. Shapes the policy-first narrative and house style; it does not design identification or build the welfare model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging AAMAS multiagent code, environments, opponent and population sets, random seeds, game definitions, and logs as anonymous supplementary evidence or a public post-acceptance release, even without a separate artifact badge, so that game-theory and MARL reviewers can inspect and re-run the interaction claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a creator, influencer, founder, competitor, or brand social account to explain its positioning, content pillars, winning posts, hooks, formats, series, calls to action, and audience response. Use when the user wants to understand why an account works and what patterns to test without copying it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find quick-win SEO content opportunities by comparing your site's existing content against competitor keyword rankings. Chains site-content-catalog and seo-domain-analyzer to build a content inventory, then identifies gaps — topics competitors rank for that you don't cover yet. Outputs a prioritized list of posts to write or update. Use when a seed/Series A team wants to start winning organic traffic without guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a website's SEO visibility, keyword rankings, traffic estimates, and competitive positioning. Uses web search probes, SimilarWeb (free tier via web), and site: queries to build an SEO profile without requiring paid tool subscriptions. Useful for competitive intel, gap analysis, and reverse-engineering a company's organic acquisition strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Subscribe to and scan industry newsletters for buying signals, competitor mentions, ICP pain-point language, and market shifts. Parses incoming newsletter emails via AgentMail, matches against keyword campaigns, and delivers a weekly digest of actionable signals. Use when a marketing team wants to turn newsletter subscriptions into an ongoing intelligence feed without manual reading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn public social videos, transcripts, posts, creator research, or the user's own source material into platform-specific LinkedIn posts, X posts and threads, short-form scripts, newsletters, blog outlines, carousel briefs, and content calendars. Use when the user wants to reuse a strong idea without copying the source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose Meta Ads campaign performance and account gaps using Meta's actual system mechanics — including customer-journey coverage, Breakdown Effect, Learning Phase, Auction Overlap, Pacing, and Creative Fatigue. Use for performance diagnosis, account audits, full-funnel or TOF/MOF/BOF gap analysis, deciding what to test or create next, and producing novice-friendly recommendations without forcing every campaign or ad into a funnel stage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Take someone from a business goal to a verified, paused-then-live Meta/Facebook/Instagram campaign without making them learn Meta's hierarchy. Use automatically for requests to launch, run, create, publish, set up, or plan Meta ads; use reporting skills for analysis-only requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render a deterministic text-only video ad from approved copy, font, colors, timing and CTA. Use when a brand needs an animated message without product photography or a creator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a user journey you just clicked through into a saved regression check that re-runs deterministically, with no model in the loop and no test code to write. Use when you have driven the same flow twice, when the user wants regression coverage without a Playwright suite, when a refactor needs proving against every existing journey, or when re-verifying by hand is costing a full drive every time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force the states a happy-path run never reaches (a failing API, an empty list, a slow request, a timeout, an expired session, a toast that auto-dismisses) and check the UI actually handles them. Use when error handling was written but never run, when a loading or empty state needs verifying, when a bug only happens on a slow connection, or when a timer, poll, debounce or retry needs testing without sleeping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sweep a whole running web app for what is broken, without writing a script or knowing the codebase. Clicks every reachable control and reports dead buttons, console errors, failed requests, and places where the API and the screen disagree. Use on an unfamiliar codebase, before a release, after a big merge or dependency bump, when the user asks for a smoke test or a health check, or when someone says "just check everything still works".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick up the bugs a human flagged by pointing at them in the running app, each arriving with the element, the note they typed, and the source file and line. Use when the user says they marked or flagged something, when starting a session on an app someone has been clicking through, when a designer or PM has left feedback in the UI, or when the user describes a problem as "that button there" without saying which file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install, instrument and verify a web app end to end without pausing for a human. Use in an autonomous or goal-mode agent, in CI, or in any client that asks for approval on every command: it never says "restart your client" or "open a browser", because it takes a route that needs neither. Prefer the normal install-and-verify skill when a human is present and can answer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Statically analyze a Simulink model for Rapid Accelerator (raccel) mode incompatibilities. Identifies unsupported blocks (Interpreted MATLAB Function, Level-2 S-Functions without TLC), configuration issues, and data type restrictions that prevent code generation. Classifies each issue as BLOCKER (build error) or WARNING (build warning). Use BEFORE calling sim() in rapid-accelerator mode, when buildRapidAcceleratorTarget fails, or when the user asks "why won't my model run in raccel?" TRIGGER: any request explicitly involving rapid accelerator mode, raccel, raccel build errors, or buildRapidAcceleratorTarget failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes Simulink models for Embedded Coder generated code. Use when asked to optimize or improve generated code, or reduce code metrics for a Simulink model. Targets: execution time, memory footprint (RAM, ROM, stack, data copies), code size, MISRA compliance, or any semantically similar generated-code metric. Works iteratively — measures baseline, suggests changes, applies, and re-measures to confirm improvement. Triggers can be prompts similar to: optimize generated code runtime, reduce runtime, shrink code size, improve code efficiency, reduce memory usage, speed up generated code, follow MISRA compliance and so on. CAUTION: Do NOT attempt to optimize Simulink models for generated code efficiency without following this skill — the iterative measurement, gating, and rollback workflow is essential for safe optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Akka.Management for cluster bootstrapping, service discovery (Kubernetes, Azure, Config), health checks, and dynamic cluster formation without static seed nodes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。