「hr」の検索結果

Apply modern Swift language patterns and idioms for non-concurrency, non-SwiftUI code. Covers if/switch expressions (Swift 5.9+), typed throws (Swift 6+), result builders, property wrappers, opaque and existential types (some vs any), guard patterns, Never type, Regex builders (Swift 5.7+), Codable best practices (CodingKeys, custom decoding, nested containers), modern collection APIs (count(where:), contains(where:), replacing()), FormatStyle (.formatted() on dates, numbers, measurements), and string interpolation patterns. Use when writing core Swift code involving generics, protocols, enums, closures, or modern language features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement, review, or improve data visualizations using Swift Charts. Use when building bar, line, area, point, pie, or donut charts; when adding chart selection, scrolling, or annotations; when plotting functions with vectorized BarPlot, LinePlot, AreaPlot, or PointPlot; when customizing axes, scales, legends, or foregroundStyle grouping; or when creating specialized visualizations like heat maps, Gantt charts, stacked/grouped bars, sparklines, or threshold lines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug iOS apps and profile performance using LLDB, Memory Graph Debugger, and Instruments. Use when diagnosing crashes, memory leaks, retain cycles, main thread hangs, slow rendering, build failures, or when profiling CPU, memory, energy, and network usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement App Intents for Siri, Shortcuts, Spotlight, widgets, Control Center, and Apple Intelligence on iOS. Covers AppIntent actions, AppEntity and EntityQuery models, AppShortcutsProvider phrases, IndexedEntity Spotlight indexing, WidgetConfigurationIntent, SnippetIntent, and assistant schemas. Use when exposing app actions or entities to system surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose data races, convert callback-based code to async/await, implement actor isolation patterns, resolve Sendable conformance issues, and guide Swift 6 migration. Use when developers mention: (1) Swift Concurrency, async/await, actors, or tasks, (2) "use Swift Concurrency" or "modern concurrency patterns", (3) migrating to Swift 6, (4) data races or thread safety issues, (5) refactoring closures to async/await, (6) @MainActor, Sendable, or actor isolation, (7) concurrent code architecture or performance optimization, (8) concurrency-related linter warnings (SwiftLint or similar; e.g. async_without_await, Sendable/actor isolation/MainActor lint).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern Swift concurrency with async/await, actors, TaskGroup, Sendable, and proper actor isolation for thread-safe iOS development

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance from code review and architecture. Use for requests to diagnose slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU/memory usage, excessive view updates, or layout thrash in SwiftUI apps, and to provide guidance for user-run Instruments profiling when code review alone is insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Core Data guidance (iOS/macOS): stack setup, fetch requests & NSFetchedResultsController, saving/merge conflicts, threading & Swift Concurrency, batch operations & persistent history, migrations, performance, and NSPersistentCloudKitContainer/CloudKit sync.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and optimize React component performance issues (slow renders, re-render thrash, laggy lists, expensive computations). Use when asked to profile or improve a React component, reduce re-renders, or speed up UI updates in React apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when someone asks to write, rewrite, review, or improve text that appears inside a product or interface. Examples: "review the UX copy", "is there a better way to phrase this", "rewrite this error message", "write copy for this screen/flow/page", reviewing button labels, improving CLI output messages, writing onboarding copy, settings descriptions, or confirmation dialogs. Trigger whenever the request involves wording shown to end users inside software — apps, web, CLI, email notifications, modals, tooltips, empty states, or alerts. Also trigger for vague requests like "review the UX" where interface copy review is implied. Do NOT trigger for content marketing, blog posts, app store listings, API docs, brand guides, cover letters, or interview questions — this is a technical writing skill for interface language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft a single, high-quality GitHub issue from a developer's description of a bug, unexpected behavior, or desired enhancement. Walks through reproduction, codebase exploration, and structured drafting so the issue is actionable on arrival. Use when user wants to file an issue, report a bug, request a feature, or document a problem they've encountered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates as many digits of pi as possible and writes them into files inside a tokenMaxxing/ folder. Use when the user asks to token-maxx, fill a file with pi digits, test agent output throughput, or generate N pi files sequentially or in parallel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks how to "use VibeTags", "add VibeTags annotations", "set up AI guardrails", "protect code from AI", "configure AI platforms", asks about @AILocked, @AIContext, @AIDraft, @AIAudit, @AIIgnore, @AIPrivacy, @AICore, @AIPerformance, @AIContract, @AITestDriven, @AIThreadSafe, @AIImmutable, @AIDeprecated, @AIObservability, @AIRegulation, @AIArchitecture, @AILegacyBridge, @AIStrictClasspath, @AIInternationalized, @AIPublicAPI, @AISchemaSafe, @AIStrictExceptions, @AIStrictTypes, @AIParallelTests, @AIIdempotent, @AIFeatureFlag, @AISecure, @AICallersOnly, @AISandboxOnly, @AIMemoryBudget, @AIPure, @AIDomainModel, @AIExtensible, @AIInputSanitized, @AISecureLogging, @AIExplain, @AIPrototype, @AISunset, @AITemporary annotations, or wants to control how AI tools interact with Java code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare Korean interview follow-up questions and evidence-backed answer points from resume.md, JD analysis, cover letter text, and an evidence map. Use after HR review or final cover letter drafting when the user wants 면접 준비, 꼬리질문, interview defense, or claim verification before manual submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a company-specific job application package from a JD, resume.md, cover letter drafts, HR review, and optional company values input. Use when the user wants 지원 패키지, submission checklist, application folder structure, final answer snippets, email draft support, or safe pre-submission preparation without automatic final submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "优化简历", "resume optimization", "简历诊断", "tailor resume to JD", "改简历", "resume review", "简历优化助手", or when the user mentions "校招", "社招", "ATS", "JD匹配", "Word批注", shares a .docx resume path alongside a job description, or wants to match their resume to a specific job posting. Also triggers on "resume expert", "HR feedback", "interview prep with resume".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A clear description of what this skill does and when to use it. Include specific trigger phrases like "do X" or "help me with Y". Also include negative triggers — "do NOT use when..." — to prevent false activations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual testing + bug filing for Enterprise / SaaS products. Parses a Feishu test doc (scope + repo + bitable URL), observes staging via claude-in-chrome, captures DOM/console/network/screenshot evidence, then dual-tracks each finding — Feishu Bitable record (with attachments) + GitHub issue (<REPO>#<ISSUE_NUMBER> format — English-primary, Chinese collapsed, R2-hosted screenshots, matching type label). Enforces dedup across bitable + GitHub issues + PRs, and mandatory P0/P1/P2 priority prompt when unclear. Trigger whenever the user says "test and report", "test and report side-by-side", "start system testing", "experience staging", "collaborate on bug filing", "collect feedback", a shared Feishu testing doc, a bitable URL + finding, or any UX/bug needing both bitable + GitHub tracking. Do NOT use for writing product code, PR review, CI debugging, or general "how do I use this product" questions — those go to normal dev / PR-review / support flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discuss a community-edition product requirement with the user, draft a bilingual (Chinese + English) PRD for review, then — after explicit user approval — create the English-only issue on GitHub (<OWNER/REPO>). Use whenever the user wants to turn a requirement (from a Feishu doc, a meeting note, a customer ask, or a rough idea) into a GitHub issue. Triggers on phrases like "create requirement doc", "create a requirement", "put this requirement on GitHub", "create new feature issue", "draft an issue for...", or anytime the user describes a product feature/improvement they want tracked. The format is opinionated (Background / Goal / Spec / Verification / Related, NO implementation details, draft shown bilingually for human review, issue itself written in English only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting a bug or defect ticket, reviewing one someone else wrote, or deciding whether a reported problem is ready to file. Keeps what the reporter actually saw separate from what the agent later found out, so a reader can tell which lines are testimony and which are collected proof. Trigger phrases: 'file a bug', 'write up this defect', 'triage this report', 'is this ticket ready to file', 'what did the reporter actually see'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and verify Three.js product viewer shell for Data-heavy application with Bootstrap v5.3 using a working semantic implementation, responsive RTL/LTR behavior, theme tokens, test plan and design verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GPU budgets: production-level draw calls, overdraw, LOD, DPR budget. Use when implementing, reviewing or testing gpu budgets for React, Vite, Next.js or Perfect_AI projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。