「are」の検索結果

Consolidate PostHog error tracking issues that are the same actual error reported under different fingerprints. Use when the user asks "why do I have so many TypeError issues that look the same?", "merge these duplicates", "stop splitting this error into new issues", or wants to clean up fingerprint sprawl. Decides between a one-shot merge of existing issues and a durable grouping rule that keeps future events from creating new fingerprints. Does NOT group conceptually similar bugs across different runtimes, SDKs, or call sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When GitHub Actions fails, fetch failing job logs and assign each failing job to a separate subagent that fixes its slice of the problem in parallel. Use for multi-job CI failures where jobs are independent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore a large codebase in parallel by launching multiple explore subagents that each investigate a different area simultaneously. Use when onboarding onto a new project, understanding architecture, or investigating a cross-cutting concern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog error tracking to capture and monitor exceptions. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure errors are tracked with stack traces and source maps. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses the health of a project's PostHog SDK integrations — which SDKs are out of date and how to fix them. Use when a user asks about PostHog SDK versions, outdated SDKs, upgrade recommendations, "SDK health", "SDK doctor" (the former name), or when events or features seem off and it might be due to an old SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses CI and pull-request pipeline health for a GitHub repo using the engineering analytics MCP tools — pull-requests (PR list with CI status), workflow-health (per-workflow CI trends), and pr-lifecycle (a single PR's timeline). Use when asked whether CI is getting faster or slower, which GitHub Actions workflow is the slow or flaky long-pole, how long PRs take from open to merge, how an author's merge time compares to the cohort, which open PRs have failing or pending CI, or where a specific pull request is stuck. Triggers on "engineering analytics", "is CI getting slower", "slow workflow", "flaky CI", "time to merge", "cycle time", "PR throughput", "failing checks", "where is PR <n> stuck", "CI long pole", "what's holding up this PR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document and type a Sentry API endpoint. Write or fix @extend_schema decorators, specify response TypedDicts, type request parameters, correct type drift between the declared schema and the runtime response, and validate the generated spec. Use when asked to "document an endpoint", "add OpenAPI docs", "add/fix @extend_schema", "type an endpoint response", "fix the response type", "fix type drift", "reuse a response type", "split an overloaded endpoint", "specify the response schema", "add a TypedDict response", "migrate a legacy api-docs path", "fix a parameter type", or "make an endpoint public" / "promote an endpoint" (promotion is one section here).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses why a session recording is missing or was not captured. Use when a user asks why a session has no replay, why recordings aren't appearing, or wants to troubleshoot session replay capture issues for a specific session ID or across their project. Covers SDK diagnostic signals, project settings, sampling, triggers, ad blockers, and quota/billing scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspects PostHog Web analytics Live tab data — current users online, last-30-minutes pageviews, top pages, referrers, devices, browsers, countries, bot traffic, and the per-minute bot/users charts. Use when the user asks "who is on my site right now?", "what is happening live?", "what bots are crawling me?", asks about the "live tab" / "live dashboard", wants live numbers (last 30 min), or wants help filtering or drilling into the live view. Also covers building product-analytics insights that mirror what the tiles show.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics. TRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides exploration of $autocapture events captured by posthog-js to understand user interactions, find CSS selectors (especially data-attr attributes), evaluate selector uniqueness, query matching clicks ad-hoc, and create actions. Use when the user asks about autocapture data, wants to find what users are clicking, needs to build actions from click events, asks about elements_chain, wants to build a trend or funnel filtered by clicks or other autocapture interactions, asks which properties autocapture sends, or asks how to filter $autocapture events. Only applies to projects using posthog-js autocapture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability evaluations of both types — `hog` (deterministic code-based) and `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual pass/fail results, and generate AI-powered summaries of patterns across many runs. Use when the user asks to debug why an evaluation is failing, surface common failure modes, compare results across filters, dry-run a Hog evaluator, prototype a new LLM-judge prompt, or manage the evaluation lifecycle (create, update, enable/disable, delete).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to explore and make sense of PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to understand what scouts they have, how each one is behaving, and whether the fleet is actually working. Covers surveying the fleet and its schedules, reading recent scout runs and drilling into a single run's reasoning, inspecting the durable scratchpad memory the fleet has built up, tracing a run to the findings it emitted, and assessing a scout's health and performance over time (cadence, success rate, emit rate, signal-to-noise). Read-only and exploratory — to write or tune a scout, use `authoring-signals-scouts` instead. Trigger on "what are my scouts doing", "how is my <x> scout performing", "show me recent scout runs", "why did this scout find/emit nothing", "what has the fleet learned", "explore scout run <id>", "is my scout working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a PostHog endpoint with the right shape on the first try — covers query kind choice, name conventions, what to expose as variables (HogQL code_name vs insight breakdown), data_freshness_seconds, and whether to materialise on day one. Use when the user says "create an endpoint", "expose this query as an API", "turn this insight into an endpoint", or asks for help structuring a new endpoint. Steers away from common mistakes: materialising a query with cohort breakdowns or compare mode, inline-only variables on a materialised endpoint, unbounded date ranges, ambiguous names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents through creating and safely sizing a Replay Vision scanner: choosing the scanner type (monitor/classifier/scorer/summarizer), shaping the RecordingsQuery that selects sessions, and — crucially — estimating observation volume and checking the org's monthly quota before creating, so a broad scanner doesn't exhaust the budget on its first scheduled sweep. TRIGGER when: user asks to create, set up, or configure a Replay Vision scanner, OR when you are about to call vision-scanners-create, OR when widening an existing scanner's query or sampling_rate via vision-scanners-update. DO NOT TRIGGER when: only reading scanners or observations, deleting a scanner, or running an existing scanner against a single session on demand (vision-scanners-scan-session).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses what a page's heatmap is telling you and recommends concrete changes. Pulls click / rageclick / scroll-depth data for a URL, names the hot elements by cross-referencing autocapture events on the same page, and can create a saved heatmap the user opens in PostHog, then summarizes the behavior and proposes improvements. TRIGGER when: user asks what a heatmap shows, why people aren't clicking something, where users rage-click, how far they scroll, what to change on a page based on heatmap/click data, or to 'analyze/assess/review the heatmap' for a URL. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user only wants to create a saved heatmap screenshot with no analysis (use heatmaps-saved-create directly), or is asking about session replay in general (use investigating-replay).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences. Use when the user wants to see how users interact with different experiment variants, identify usability issues, compare behavior patterns between control and test groups, or get qualitative insights to complement quantitative experiment results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep literature review — PubMed, EuropePMC, bioRxiv preprints, citation networks, evidence synthesis. Disambiguates queries, runs collision-aware searches, grades evidence T1-T4, and produces structured reports. Use for systematic literature review, meta-analysis evidence collection, and detailed answer-with-citations workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build interactive HTML/web visualizations with plotly (Python/R), bokeh (Python), and gganimate/plotly frames for animation, with awareness of current Kaleido static-export model (post-orca-EOL), HTML file-size bloat, and the limits of interactive-only output for journal submission. Use when producing zoomable/hoverable plots for notebook EDA, supplementary HTML, dashboards, or animated time-course / iteration visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。