「builder」の検索結果

Audit the project's documentation (CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, README, CONTRIBUTING, SECURITY, .env.example, app/data/*.md, learn articles) against the actual code and config, and fix drift. Use after refactors, dependency or workflow changes, or on a schedule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add, update, or retire an AI provider model option for the BYOK theme generator (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) and verify the provider requests native structured output for it. Use when model lists go stale or a new provider/model is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when editing .vue files, creating Vue 3 components, writing composables, or testing Vue code - provides Composition API patterns, props/emits best practices, VueUse integration, and reactive destructuring guidance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working on Nuxt 4+ projects - provides server routes, file-based routing, middleware patterns, Nuxt-specific composables, and configuration with latest docs. Covers h3 v1 helpers (validation, WebSocket, SSE) and nitropack v2 patterns. Updated for Nuxt 4.3+.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with VueUse composables - provides reactive utilities for state, browser APIs, sensors, network, animations. Check VueUse before writing custom composables - most patterns already implemented.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing blog posts or documentation markdown files - provides writing style guide (active voice, present tense), content structure patterns, and MDC component usage. Overrides brevity rules for proper grammar. Use nuxt-content for MDC syntax, nuxt-ui for component props.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodic repository health check — install, full validation, unused-code scan, outdated/vulnerable dependencies, and docs drift — ending in a concise report and, when there are safe fixes, a single PR. Designed to run unattended from a scheduled routine; also usable on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building styled UI with @nuxt/ui v4 components (Button, Modal, Form, Table, etc.) - provides ready-to-use components with Tailwind Variants theming. Use vue skill for raw component patterns, reka-ui for headless primitives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and register a new Learning Hub article (Nuxt Content markdown under content/learn) with valid frontmatter, navigation entry, route list entry, and accurate product details. Use when adding or substantially rewriting a learn guide, reference, or tip.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a new interactive design tool under /tools (like the color converter or contrast checker) — component, page, navigation, route lists, SEO, and tests. Use when building a new utility tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building with Reka UI (headless Vue components) - provides component API, accessibility patterns, composition (asChild), controlled/uncontrolled state, virtualization, and styling integration. Formerly Radix Vue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checklist for adding or changing a field on ThemeConfig (a new design token, per-mode setting, or export option) end to end — schema, defaults, store + history, CSS apply, export, editor UI, AI, and tests. Use whenever ThemeConfig's shape changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the project's validation pipeline (lint → format → typecheck → unit tests) with auto-fixes, then optionally stage and write a Conventional Commit. Use before committing, when asked to "check", "validate", "run the workflow", or "get this commit-ready".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prüft bereitgestellte Formularbeschreibungen auf Struktur, Validierung, Verständlichkeit und Barrierefreiheit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews one deal's notes and timeline (CRM opportunity record, activity log, emails, meeting notes, forecast entries) for risk signals such as a single contact thread, no identified budget owner, slipped or missing dates, silence after a proposal, an undefined decision process or a competitor named late, and returns a DRAFT risk register: each signal with the quoted evidence and its date, a severity on a stated scale, and one proposed next action with an owner role for the user to decide on. Use when the user asks to "review the risks on this deal", "why is this opportunity stalling", "is this deal single-threaded", "deal health check before the forecast call" or "what should we do next on <opportunity>". Do not use for a whole-account plan, use account-plan-builder instead; for scoring early leads against a rubric use lead-qualification-scorer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains four living project files (overview and progress log, decision log, RAID log, links) from the mail, channel posts, documents and meeting notes the user attaches or the agent can reach, returns each touched file complete in the chat for the user to save, and builds a weekly DRAFT status report from those files. Use when the user asks to "set up tracking for project X", "catch the project files up", "log this decision against the project", "add this risk to the RAID log", "save this link to the project" or "write this week's status report". Do not use for reviewing an existing RAID log for stale or ownerless entries, use raid-log-review instead; for an HTML status page, use project-dashboard-builder; for minutes of one meeting, use meeting-minutes-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds DRAFT user personas from the research notes, interview summaries, survey free text and support themes the user provides: for each persona the goals, pains, jobs to be done, context of use, quotes exactly as supplied with their participant codes, and the evidence count behind every attribute, with names, demographics and any detail no participant stated left UNKNOWN rather than invented. Use when the user asks to "build personas from these interviews", "who are our users based on this research", "draft user personas", "turn these research notes into personas" or "update our personas with the new interviews". Do not use for theming a batch of customer feedback into counts, use customer-feedback-theme-synthesis instead; for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis; for the requirements those personas imply, use product-requirements-draft. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a slide-by-slide presentation draft on the user's own slide template and checks every slide against written brand rules (colours with hex codes, fonts, logo placement, slide archetypes, tone, banned visuals), returning the approved outline, the DRAFT deck content and a compliance report as Markdown. Use when the user asks to "build this deck on our template", "make these slides on-brand", "check this presentation against our brand guidelines", "rebuild these slides to corporate identity (CI)" or asks for a CI-compliant or corporate-template presentation. Do not use for an accessibility review of slides, use document-accessibility-check instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a discovery call brief from what the user has on a prospect (CRM record, inbound form, emails, notes, public material the user supplies): what is known with sources, gaps against the qualification dimensions, hypotheses to test, questions in priority order and what to listen for. Returns a DRAFT Markdown brief in the chat. Use when the user asks to "prep me for the discovery call with <prospect>", "what should I ask on this first call", "intro call brief", "questions for the qualification call" or "what do we know before we speak to them". Do not use for scoring leads against a rubric, use lead-qualification-scorer instead; for an existing customer's account review use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews the text and structure of a document, slide deck or web page against the accessibility rules the user supplies, or a default set covering heading structure, image alternative text, colour used as the only cue, link text, reading order, tables and language, and returns numbered findings with location, rule, severity and a ready-to-apply fix for the author, plus proposed alt text and a list of checks that need a tool or a person. Use when the user asks to "check this document for accessibility", "review the alt text in this deck", "is this page accessible", "run an accessibility check on these slides", "find accessibility issues before I publish" or "check my headings and link text". Do not use for brand or template compliance of slides, use branded-deck-builder instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a DRAFT self-assessment, peer feedback note or manager review narrative from the evidence the writer supplies (goals, examples, metrics, notes), in the review template where given: every sentence tied to a numbered evidence item, unsupported claims removed and logged, and a gaps list to complete before submitting. Never assigns, suggests or implies a rating, score, ranking, pay or promotion outcome. Use when the user asks to "write my self-assessment", "draft peer feedback for a colleague", "turn these notes into a performance review", "help me write the year-end review for my report", "summarise my achievements against my goals" or "draft the mid-year review". Do not use for a job description or role profile, use job-description-drafter instead; for a new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a set of questions (form exports, helpdesk logs, meeting Q and A, chat threads, a plain list) plus the source documents the user supplies into a DRAFT FAQ grouped by theme: every answer quoted or paraphrased from a named source with a reference, verbatim quotes for dates, figures, eligibility and obligations, UNKNOWN where the sources are silent, a source register with precedence, a conflicts table and a routing list of unanswered questions to owners. Use when the user asks to "build an FAQ from these documents", "answer these questions from the policy", "turn the Q and A into an FAQ page", "group these questions and answer them from the guide" or "what do our documents say about these questions". Do not use for the manager FAQ of a changed HR policy, use policy-change-briefing instead; for checking whether a document's own claims are evidenced, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and maintains a DRAFT impact log from notes, messages, status updates and completed work: one row per outcome with its evidence and evidence level, date, who benefited and the source it traces to, plus a gap list of outcomes that still lack evidence, structured so a later review, appraisal or promotion case can draw on it. Use when the user asks to "start an impact log", "add this to my impact log", "log what I achieved this quarter", "pull my wins out of these notes", "turn these messages into evidence for my review" or "what do I have evidence for so far". Do not use for a performance rating, ranking, pay or promotion decision, the skill records evidence and never judges it; for the review narrative itself, use performance-review-drafter; for a role profile built from the work, use job-description-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。