2,363 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Configure multi-tenant organizations, manage members and invitations, define custom roles and permissions, set up teams, and implement RBAC using Better Auth's organization plugin. Use when users need org setup, team management, member roles, access control, or the Better Auth organization plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define, deploy, and manage cloud infrastructure as code using tools like Terraform, Pulumi, CloudFormation, and CDK, ensuring consistency, repeatability, and version control. Use when the user requests infrastructure as code or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design reproducible evaluations for AI agents with representative task sets, explicit rubrics, appropriate graders, baselines, regression gates, and failure analysis. Use when defining agent quality, comparing prompts or models, validating a release, measuring tool-use reliability, investigating regressions, or deciding whether an agent is ready for production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design privacy-aware observability for AI agents using traces, spans, structured events, metrics, cost attribution, dashboards, alerts, and investigation workflows. Use when instrumenting an agent, debugging intermittent tool or model failures, defining service-level objectives, analyzing latency or spend, auditing agent decisions, or preparing production monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and validate model-facing tool definitions with clear names, action-oriented descriptions, bounded JSON Schema parameters, explicit side effects, safe defaults, idempotency, errors, and realistic tests. Use when creating function-calling tools, MCP tools, agent actions, structured tool inputs, or when a model selects the wrong tool, invents arguments, or causes unsafe side effects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform systematic exploratory data analysis to understand dataset structure, distributions, relationships, and anomalies before modeling. Use when a dataset is new, its quality is unknown, or the user requests open-ended profiling; use data-analysis instead for a defined hypothesis or decision question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Microelectronics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Microelectronics Engineer judgment. Reasons from CTE mismatch, θja networks (JESD51), and package RLC through wire bond (Au–Al IMC, loop height), flip-chip (UBM, underfill, HIP/NWO), J-STD-020 MSL, and JESD22 TCT/uHAST; treats datasheet θja without board definition, wire sweep, die-attach voids, and soak-mode mismatch as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Environmental Policy Analyst. Use when a task calls for Environmental Policy Analyst judgment. Reasons from statutory authority, baseline definition, and monetization boundaries through NEPA/ESA compliance, Circular A-4 RIAs, EPA SC-GHG and benefit transfer, IAM/IPCC scenario use, and APA regulatory comment while treating discount-rate dominance, weak transfer extrapolation, IAM structural uncertainty, and baseline inflation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Epidemiologist. Use when a task calls for Epidemiologist judgment. Reasons from person-time, transmission dynamics, and population case definitions through epidemic curves, DAGs, renewal and SEIR models (EpiEstim, deSolve), SaTScan clustering, and STROBE/ORION/GRADE standards while treating confounding, collider stratification from test-positive conditioning, reporting-delay and testing-intensity artifacts, and superspreading overdispersion as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Comparative Physiologist. Use when a task calls for Comparative Physiologist judgment. Reason from the Krogh principle and oxygen cascade through intermittent-flow respirometry, SMR/BMR/MMR scope, Q10 and heterothermy, hemoglobin P50, allometry and PGLS, while treating chamber drift, activity artifacts, phylogenetic pseudoreplication, and SMR definition mismatch as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Critical Care Researcher. Use when a task calls for Critical Care Researcher judgment. Reasons from acute physiology trajectories, modular organ dysfunction, and cluster-aware trial design through APACHE/SAPS/SOFA scoring, Berlin/Sepsis-3/KDIGO definitions, MIMIC-IV phenotyping, and target-trial emulation with clone-censor-weighting while treating immortal-time bias, cluster contamination, competing risks from early death, and sepsis-phenotype cohort inflation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Clinical Data Manager. Use when a task calls for Clinical Data Manager judgment. Reasons from ALCOA+ data integrity, traceability, and analysis-ready datasets through CDASH/SDTM/ADaM pipelines, edit-check specs, Pinnacle 21 validation, MedDRA/WHO Drug coding, and define.xml under 21 CFR Part 11, treating blinding breaches, SAE-safety reconciliation gaps, mid-study IG/dictionary version drift, and unspecified partial-date imputation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Behavioral Neuroscientist. Use when a task calls for Behavioral Neuroscientist judgment. Reasons from contingency structure, deprivation state, and latent arousal/motivation variables through Morris water maze, contextual/cued fear conditioning, operant schedules on Med Associates rigs, and DeepLabCut/SLEAP/SimBA tracking validated against ethograms, while treating thigmotaxis-as-anxiety, locomotor confounds of memory deficits, peripheral CNO sedation, and trials-as-n pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
options income, covered call strategy, cash secured puts, credit spreads, iron condor, wheel strategy, premium selling, yield enhancement, defined risk income, monthly income options
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured feature specifications through a collaborative product interview. Acts as a senior PM and business analyst pair — arrives with a point of view, challenges scope, proposes options at every decision. Composes the requirement-quality atom for spec quality enforcement and collaborative-judgment for surfacing genuine decisions. Produces an epic/feature hierarchy in .lattice/requirements/ that serves as direct input to design-blueprint. Use when the user says 'forge requirements', 'write requirements', 'spec this feature', 'create a feature spec', 'define this epic', 'write a PRD', 'spec out what we are building', or 'requirement forge'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Protocol for handling ambiguous decisions and missing/conflicting knowledge during code generation, design, and review. Ensures AI surfaces genuine judgment calls with structured options and stops on hallucination risk instead of silently assuming. Use when a decision has multiple valid approaches, when facts are missing or contradictory, when the user asks 'what should we do here?', 'is this a judgment call?', 'should I ask about this?', 'am I guessing here?', 'what are the tradeoffs?', or when deciding between two reasonable architectural or design options. Also composed by molecules to define how judgment calls and clarification requests are surfaced and resolved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage per-feature living documents that capture decisions, constraints, and reasoning across AI sessions during active development. Scoped to feature-level work — design, implementation, bugfix, refactor — not for codebase-wide assessments or product-wide specifications (those define their own document lifecycles). Handles creating new context documents, loading existing ones, and enriching them with new decisions. Use when starting a new feature, resuming work, making technical decisions, resolving questions, or when context needs to persist across sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'load context', 'update context', 'context doc', 'decisions', 'continue where we left off', 'what did we decide', or 'capture this decision'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, produce, adapt, finish, deliver, and improve platform-ready short vertical social videos from a brief, script, transcript, or source media. Use for TikTok videos, Instagram or Facebook Reels, YouTube Shorts, LinkedIn vertical clips, and cross-platform social cutdowns when the work requires audience and objective definition, an honest hook and promise, short-form beat or shot planning, UI-safe layout, captions and accessibility, speech/music/SFX mixing, platform-specific exports, rights and AI or sponsorship disclosure, analytics-led retention iteration, or final QA and repair. Do not use as a provider-specific image, video, voice, or music generation guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provider-independent media quality control and delivery direction for generated images, video, audio, ads, product content, social clips, broadcast and streaming assets, localization packages, and mixed-source edits. Use when an agent must define final export specs, inspect technical and perceptual quality, check captions/audio/color/accessibility/provenance/rights, create delivery sheets, version filenames, checksums, manifests, package deliverables, set acceptance or rejection criteria, and perform final delivery QA before handoff to a platform, broadcaster, streamer, client, or ad trafficker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select colormaps and qualitative palettes for scientific figures using perceptual-uniformity, color-vision-deficiency safety, and luminance-monotonicity criteria. Covers Crameri scientific colormaps, viridis/cividis/magma, Okabe-Ito categorical, ColorBrewer, and the rainbow/jet critique. Use when choosing palettes for heatmaps, scatter, networks, or any encoding where color carries quantitative or categorical meaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。