「rsa」の検索結果

Shape output for a reader with ADHD. Use this skill whenever responding to ANY user message including coding tasks, debugging, explanations, planning, and casual conversation. Output should lead with concrete next actions, number multi-step work, externalize state across turns, suppress tangents, give specific time estimates, and make wins visible. Trigger even on casual messages and even when the user did not explicitly ask for brevity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate built features through conversational UAT

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package sketch design findings into a persistent project skill for future build conversations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package spike findings into a persistent project skill for future build conversations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, edits or analyzes Agent Skills through conversational discovery. Use when the user requests to "Create an Agent", "Analyze an Agent" or "Edit an Agent".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal context persistence across sessions. Auto-saves decisions, conventions, and progress to .rune/ files. Loads state at session start. Use when any skill makes architectural decisions or establishes patterns that must survive session boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal verification runner. Runs lint, type-check, tests, and build. Use after any code change to verify nothing is broken.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-implementation red-team analysis. Use when a plan is high-risk, critical path, or expensive to reverse. Challenges plans before code is written — finds edge cases, security holes, scalability bottlenecks, error propagation risks, and integration conflicts. Catches flaws at plan time (10x cheaper than post-implementation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates structured handoff briefings between agents. Use when delegating complex work to subagents that would otherwise lose context. Packages task context, constraints, and progress into a compact packet that subagents can consume without re-reading the full conversation. Prevents the 'lost context' problem in multi-agent delegation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify integrity of persisted state, skill outputs, and context bus data. Use when validating .rune/ files or sub-agent outputs against prompt injection, memory poisoning, identity spoofing, or adversarial payloads. Called by sentinel, team, session-bridge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate minimal, abstract, UI-inspired illustrations for software product features — as deterministic SVG. Use when asked for a feature illustration, product illustration, spot illustration, empty-state graphic, feature-card artwork, docs or developer-portal illustration, or a consistent illustration set/family for a product. Also use to turn a feature description or a product screenshot into an abstract UI illustration, to add a new illustration to an existing family, or to retheme an existing set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Returns the universal governance spec for swarm team runs — hard rules, briefing templates, gate presentation contract, launch mechanics, and pulse setup. The canonical source: invoked by launch.md at Step 1 and by user-authored shortcut commands that cannot read launch.md directly. Per-gate constants live in swarm:gate-presentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Developer reference for building applications, tools, and agents on the Pi Durable agent harness (@earendil-works/pi-durable) and the pi-ai model layer. Use when writing or debugging code that imports @earendil-works/pi-durable or pi-ai: assembling a Harness over memory/SQLite/JSONL/Durable Object storage, submitting input and waiting for answers, defining tools with TypeBox schemas and structured output, calling tools from tools, hooks and guards, durable tasks with checkpoints and ownership, subagents and child tasks, documents and migrations, code mode, tool search, per-conversation environments, compaction, recovery after a crash, storage and environment conformance tests, or choosing models and providers. Also use when a durable/agent-runtime behavior question comes up: what survives a restart, why an input stayed queued, why a task is blocked or orphaned, how abort cascades, or what the Pico5 specification requires.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the Semantic Scholar academic corpus through AI2's Asta MCP server: keyword or title search with venue and date filters, who-cited-a-paper traversal, author profiles and publications, DOI/arXiv/PMID lookup, and ~500-word full-text snippets for evidence, with citation counts and h-index. Use when the user asks for papers on a topic, who cited a paper, an author's work, recent literature since a date, or a venue-scoped paper list. Requires the Asta MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。