「spr」の検索結果

World-class motion design expertise combining Disney's 12 principles of animation, Material Design's motion system, and the performance-first philosophy of production interfaces. Motion design is the craft of bringing interfaces to life - not through decoration, but through clarity, continuity, and communication. Great motion design is invisible. Users don't notice the animations - they notice that the interface feels natural, responsive, and alive. Every transition tells a story: where did this come from? Where is it going? What just happened? Motion is the language of cause and effect in digital interfaces. Use when "animation, motion, transition, microinteraction, easing, timing, choreography, loading animation, skeleton loader, page transition, hover effect, scroll animation, spring animation, keyframes, framer motion, gsap, lottie, animation, motion, transitions, microinteractions, easing, timing, accessibility, performance, frontend, design" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building interactive experiences that engage, challenge, and delight playersUse when "game, gamedev, game development, phaser, unity, unreal, godot, gameplay, game loop, sprites, collision, physics, player, level, tilemap, games, gamedev, interactive, gameplay, physics, engines, performance, player-experience" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building interactive experiences that engage, challenge, and delight playersUse when "game, gamedev, game development, phaser, unity, unreal, godot, gameplay, game loop, sprites, collision, physics, player, level, tilemap, games, gamedev, interactive, gameplay, physics, engines, performance, player-experience" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs end-of-iteration review with quality grading, metrics, and trend analysis. Use at the end of each development iteration or sprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

B2B 大客户销售 (B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄ 资格审查纪律 (MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: 先严格 qualify/disqualify, 「no deal 好过 bad deal」)**; 三派不是非此即彼, 资深人混用, 但底层世界观分歧真实(问 vs 教 vs 筛); 更深层张力 — 「过程/方法论纪律 (process rigor: 预测准确、deal inspection、qualify) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship: champion 培养、高管关系、人情)」, 「卖结果/业务价值 (business outcome/ROI、卖给经济决策人) ⇄ 卖产品/功能 (feature selling)」, 「多线程触达买方委员会 (multithreading buying committee) ⇄ 单一 champion 依赖」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — MEDDIC/MEDDPICC (Metrics 量化指标/Economic buyer 经济决策人/Decision Criteria 决策标准/Decision Process 决策流程/Identify Pain 痛点/Champion 内部拥护者 + Paper process 签约流程/Competition 竞争), SPIN (Situation/Problem/Implication/Need-payoff 提问序列), Challenger (商业洞见 commercial insight + reframe + 建设性张力 constructive tension + Mobilizer 调动者), Solution Selling (痛点链 pain chain/愿景创建/buying vision), Sandler (前置合约 up-front contract/痛苦漏斗 pain funnel/潜艇七步), Command of the Message (Force Management: 业务价值框架/before-after/decision criteria), Gap Selling (Keenan: 现状 current state → 期望 future state → 差距 the gap/问题中心), Miller Heiman Strategic Selling (蓝表 blue sheet/buying influences: 经济/用户/技术买家 + coach), Value Selling, BANT (老式资格框架, 多被 MEDDIC 取代); (c) 行业结构与角色 — SDR/BDR (开发/约见) → AE/客户经理 (成交) → SE/售前/Solutions Engineer (技术验证/POC/demo) → CSM (客户成功/续约扩张) → Sales Manager/VP Sales/CRO; RevOps (收入运营), Sales Enablement (赋能); land and expand (先落地再扩张)、量化指标 quota/OTE(目标总收入)/配额达成率/pipeline coverage(管道覆盖率 ~3x 业内经验法则)/win rate(赢率)/sales velocity(销售速度)/ramp time(爬坡期)/ACV·ARR·NRR(年合同额/年经常性收入/净收入留存); (d) 销售周期 (the deal/opportunity lifecycle) — prospecting 开发 → discovery 需求挖掘 → qualification 资格审查(MEDDIC) → demo/technical validation/POC 技术验证 → business case/value 业务价值与 ROI → proposal 提案 → negotiation 谈判(procurement 采购/法务/security review) → close 成交 → onboarding/expansion 交付与扩张; 干系人: champion 拥护者 vs coach 线人 vs economic buyer 经济决策人 vs blocker 阻碍者; mutual action plan/close plan(双向行动计划/成交计划); (e) 产出物与节奏 — discovery call(需求电话)、demo、business case、proposal/SOW、MAP(mutual action plan)、forecast(预测: commit/best case/pipeline 类别)、pipeline review/deal review/QBR(季度业务回顾)/account plan(客户计划); (f) 职业/招聘/薪酬 — quota/OTE/comp plan(底薪+提成)/accelerator(加速器)/SPIFF/clawback、ramp、President's Club(顶尖销售俱乐部)、SDR→AE→管理 晋升路径、rep turnover(销售流失率高); (g) 争议/批判 — Challenger 是否过誉(CEB 原始数据被质疑、insight selling 批评)、MEDDIC 沦为填表剧场(box-checking theater, 填字段不真 qualify)、活动指标 vs 质量(spray-and-pray 群发/冷电话存废之争)、AI SDR/自动化淹没收件箱(2024-2025 AI BDR 泡沫 + 邮件送达率崩溃 backlash)、SDR 军团模式是否将死(Winning by Design/signal-based GTM 取代)、配额虚高与销售 burnout、季末打折促单、销售方法论的「宗教化」与培训-认证产业链、最大竞争对手其实是「no decision/维持现状」而非对手; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 提问诊断派(Rackham SPIN/Bosworth&Eades Solution Selling/Keenan Gap Selling) vs 挑战教学派(Dixon&Adamson Challenger/Force Management Command of the Message) vs 资格纪律派(MEDDIC: Napoli&Dunkel 起源/John McMahon/MEDDICC Andy Whyte) vs 关系战略派(Miller Heiman Strategic/Large Account) vs SaaS 现代收入架构派(Aaron Ross Predictable Revenue/Mark Roberge Sales Acceleration Formula/Jacco van der Kooij Winning by Design bowtie/David Skok 指标) vs 开发-心态派(Jeb Blount Fanatical Prospecting/Sales EQ、Anthony Iannarino、Josh Braun) vs 谈判(Chris Voss Never Split the Difference 战术同理心)。不含: B2C/零售/电商导购销售、纯电话客服/客户支持、纯渠道/分销管理(channel 虽相关但聚焦直销复杂销售)、纯 marketing/需求生成(demand gen 虽上游但本 skill 聚焦销售执行)、纯 CSM 客户成功(虽相关但聚焦 new logo + expansion 的销售动作)。) Master OS — automated mastery of B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding, moving, or removing images, sprites, text, or video on the Pixi'VN game canvas, or when applying or creating transitions (dissolve, fade, move, zoom, push, wipe, iris, split, flash, blur, pixelate, or a custom one built on `canvas.animate`/`filters.animate`), shake/animation effects, or ticker-based animations built on PixiJS. Covers the `canvas` singleton exported from `@drincs/pixi-vn`. For UI layers (HTML or PixiJS) mounted on top of the canvas, see `pixi-vn-ui` instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Image processing toolkit awareness. Use when: user uploads images for manipulation, requests format conversion, batch processing, compositing, resizing, optimization, analysis, effects, metadata inspection, montages, animated GIFs, color correction, or any image-related task. Also use when working with screenshots, photos, diagrams, icons, or visual assets. Triggers on 'resize', 'crop', 'convert', 'compress', 'optimize', 'thumbnail', 'watermark', 'montage', 'collage', 'gif', 'sprite sheet', 'color space', 'metadata', 'EXIF', 'compare images', 'diff', 'overlay', 'composite', 'batch process', 'image analysis', 'histogram', 'blur', 'sharpen', 'rotate', 'flip', 'border', 'shadow', 'round corners', 'favicon', 'icon set'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The checkpoint coordinator for /feature. Routed to by /feature once a writing-plans plan exists. Uses authored HTML checkpoints or bounded legacy batches, delegates each scope to subagent-driven-development (fresh author agent per task, full review chain, fresh verification), then stops for a human checkpoint before the next batch. The checkpointed counterpart to /sprint's autonomous run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The implementation engine. Routed to by /sprint (full plan, autonomous) and by executing-plans (scoped batch, checkpoint-gated). One fresh subagent per task — test-first via tdd — followed by spec-compliance review, quality review, and fresh-run verification. No single context accumulates drift, and nothing is accepted on a subagent's word.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The parallel fan-out primitive. Routed to by any skill or command that splits work across independent units and dispatches an agent per unit — subagent-driven-development, /sprint, parallel /review. It owns the dispatch/collect/funnel discipline: bound concurrency, isolate units, collect every result, dedupe overlap, and funnel through finding-triage then the read-only verdict-aggregator. Raw agent output is never consumed before the funnel runs; an agent that errors records its unit as incomplete without corrupting the batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The spec-to-plan bridge. /feature supplies an approved spec; initial full-lane HTML sprint review may supply a ready draft only through draft_for_pair. Creates the same-format plan with exact paths, tests, dependencies and complete criterion coverage. The initial paired review has no execution authority until one real user reply approves both artifacts. Ordinary sequential planning retains approved-source binding and plan approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation. Also use when the user mentions "lead magnet," "gated content," "content upgrade," "downloadable," "ebook," "cheat sheet," "checklist," "template download," "opt-in," "freebie," "PDF download," "resource library," "content offer," "email capture content," "Notion template," "spreadsheet template," or "what should I give away for emails." Use this for planning what to create and how to distribute it. For interactive tools as lead magnets, see free-tools. For writing the actual content, see copywriting. For the email sequence after capture, see emails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-command multilingual blog creation. Writes a blog post, translates it into user-specified languages, applies cultural adaptation, and emits hreflang tags, sitemap entries, and a CMS-ready language map. The complete write-to-publish pipeline for international content. Orchestrates blog-write, blog-translate, blog-localize, and (optionally) seo-hreflang. Use when user says "multilingual blog", "blog multilingual", "write in multiple languages", "international blog", "mehrsprachiger Blog", "blog multilingue", "blog multilingue", "create blog in German and French".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open Analytics' design language, extracted from the shipped product: an ink-derived neutral system, squircle surface anatomy, one small spring vocabulary, pixel-matched skeletons, and a plain-spoken copy voice, with type-checked component recipes. Use this whenever you build or restyle a dashboard, SaaS app, analytics UI, settings screen, onboarding flow, or marketing/landing page that should feel calm, dense and native, and whenever the user mentions Open Analytics' look, 'clean SaaS design', cards, dropdowns, tab bars, empty states, skeletons, or UI animation quality, even if they never say the words 'design system'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Product Requirements Documents from `idea.md` and `validate.md` files. Use when asked to create or update a PRD. Don't use for TAD, sprint tasks, or raw idea validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a Technical Architecture Document (TAD) from a PRD. Use when asked to design system architecture or define how a product is built. Updates tad.md and reports GitHub links. Don't use for PRD authoring, sprint tasks, or code implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a product from idea to sprint tasks in one run: idea-validator, prd-generator, tad-generator, tasks-generator, resuming from existing files. Don't use for one document alone (PRD, TAD, tasks) or only validating an idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate sprint-based development tasks from a PRD. Use when asked to create tasks or break down requirements. Don't use for PRD/TAD authoring or task execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Daphne Koller (machine learning pioneer, co-founder of Coursera, founder and CEO of Insitro). Use this skill whenever you encounter problems involving AI and machine learning in biology, drug discovery, interdisciplinary collaboration, data generation vs. data mining, or transitioning from academia to industry. Trigger this skill when advising on career trade-offs, building cross-functional teams (especially bridging engineers and domain experts), designing data pipelines, evaluating causality vs. correlation, or applying AI to physical systems ('where bits meet atoms'). Channel her focus on fit-for-purpose data, pragmatism, and disproportionate leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever you are reasoning about large-scale scientific projects, genomics, bioethics, data infrastructure, or long-term medical translation. Eric S. Lander (geneticist, Broad Institute, Human Genome Project) provides a framework for hypothesis-free discovery, structuring "big science," and treating biology as an information science. Reach for this when the user is discussing open science, collaborative ecosystems, CRISPR/gene editing ethics, managing massive datasets, or setting realistic timelines for technological breakthroughs. Apply his principles to avoid the "lone genius" myth, prevent overpromising, and build foundational infrastructure that serves the broader community.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-assessment discipline that maps how work actually happens before anyone designs a system: floor-level interviews with the people who do the work, an inventory of every silo including spreadsheets and inboxes used as databases, friction quantified in the requester's own numbers, opportunities ranked by annual value against build complexity, and adoption watched for the thirty days after launch. Use when nobody can answer what to automate, when an operation needs auditing before a build, when tribal-knowledge and key-person risk has to surface, or when a shipped system is quietly being routed around. NOT FOR: deciding what to build and in what order once the map exists (use suede-ops-architecture); researching external customers rather than internal operators (use suede-customer-research); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); product instrumentation and dashboards (use suede-analytics); getting a new user to first value (use suede-onboarding).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-architecture discipline that fixes the shape of a system before anyone builds it: entity schema first, exactly one write path per entity, every unit of work routed to a deterministic automation, an AI agent, or a human decision, every existing tool marked absorb, keep, or kill, and the build sequenced into phases whose completion is proved by a command. Use when scoping an automation or agent build, deciding whether a workflow needs a model at all, consolidating a sprawling tool stack, designing the data model under a workflow, choosing a migration path off an old system, or ordering a build so nothing lands on a moving foundation. NOT FOR: executing a planned multi-file repo change (use suede-graph-flo-xr); coordinating parallel builders with file ownership (use suede-agent-teams); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); proving agent output quality against an eval set (use suede-ai-eval); reviewing the finished diff (use suede-code-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。