Use this skill when the user asks to verify PiAgent skill loading, asks for the PiAgent E2E skill, or asks for the skill marker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,502 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill when the user asks to verify PiAgent skill loading, asks for the PiAgent E2E skill, or asks for the skill marker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Merges, appends, joins, and deduplicates multiple CSV, TSV, and Excel files (including multi-sheet workbooks) with pandas - mapping mismatched column names to one schema, normalizing keys, resolving conflicting values, tracking which file each row came from, and verifying the row math. Use when the user wants to combine spreadsheets or exports, stack monthly files, consolidate contact or lead lists, VLOOKUP-style join two sheets on an ID or email, or dedupe records across sources, even if they only say "put these together" or "clean up these lists into one".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to actually verify a web change in a real browser instead of assuming it works — click through a flow, catch console errors, check a form submits, confirm a fix on the page. Trigger when a UI change needs proof, a bug only reproduces in the browser, or the user asks to test, check, or screenshot the running app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardizes release approvals with GitHub-aware checklists and deployment gates. Use before releasing to production to verify all gates pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Probe memory/summary clarity via dual anchor questions: task progress, info gaps. Use when verifying session state or summary before handoff or compression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-implementation gate covering think-first, simplicity, surgical edits, and verifiable goals. Use when starting implementation to verify the approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when finding papers or building a reference list. Searches PubMed, Semantic Scholar and bioRxiv/medRxiv, includes only references verified through an API, and generates BibTeX. Auditing an existing reference list is /verify-refs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when checking whether a manuscript's references are real. Audits each citation against PubMed and CrossRef, flags fabricated or mismatched entries and writes qc/reference_audit.json. Audit-only; never edits references or refs.bib. Citation-key checks are /manage-refs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when references must be written, rendered or converted. Checks [@key] citation keys, renders the reference list with a journal CSL via pandoc, converts [N] markers, injects Zotero Word field codes and runs manuscript-DOCX cross-reference QC. Read-only auditing is /verify-refs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have an existing pipeline DOT file that needs review, fixing, or validation. Use when validation produces warnings or errors, when a DOT file was hand-written or generated by another tool, or when you want to verify a pipeline covers 100% of a spec before running it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a pipeline DOT file has passed structural validation but may still have flow inefficiencies, spec fidelity gaps, or information loss in prompts. Use after dotfile-audit or dotfile-from-spec when you want to deeply verify a pipeline captures everything from the original spec. Use when prompts might be missing critical domain rules, data models, or invariants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare the local environment for the Maestro smoke-test suite — verify tooling, select a device, collect the APK if needed, validate the .env file by variable name only, then hand the user the exact lab-store CLI command to run or run it on request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "research", "fact-check", "check the history", "is this accurate", "research notes", "sources", "historical accuracy", "technical accuracy", "how would this really work", "verify a detail", "interview an expert", "plan a site visit", "expert review", or needs to investigate and record the real-world facts a story relies on and the chapters that use them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the audit of Records of Processing Activities (RoPA) against GDPR Article 30 requirements for both controllers and processors. Activate when verifying RoPA completeness, validating mandatory fields, or preparing for supervisory authority inspections. Keywords: RoPA, Article 30, records audit, processing activities, controller records, processor records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides audit follow-up and verification processes including follow-up scheduling, remediation effectiveness testing, finding closure criteria, re-testing procedures, status reporting, and escalation of unremediated findings. Implements IIA Standard 2500 monitoring requirements and ISO 19011 follow-up guidance for privacy audit engagements. Keywords: audit follow-up, verification testing, finding closure, remediation effectiveness, re-testing, follow-up audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when organizing or verifying a modular Spring Boot monolith with Spring Modulith, including module APIs, dependency rules and reliable module events. Do not restructure an application into modules for an unrelated endpoint change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug, patch, and verify failed Agent QA runs from MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, and local code without hiding product or infrastructure defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing an A/B or split test: define the hypothesis, control and variants, estimate sample size, verify tracking, and predeclare metrics and stopping rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review PRD.md for gaps, contradictions and unverifiable claims, write an improved PRD.md and record the findings in PRD-REVIEW.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update Han plugin documentation so every skill, agent, guidance doc, index, and cross-reference is current and accurate. On a non-default branch, scopes the pass to entities the branch actually touched. On the default branch, performs a full documentation sweep across the whole plugin. Use when updating, refreshing, syncing, auditing, or verifying Han's docs after changing skills, agents, references, or top-level guidance — including "update the docs", "doc sweep", "refresh documentation", "audit the docs", "make sure the docs are current". This is a repository-maintenance skill for the Han repo itself, not a general documentation skill — use /project-documentation to document features in arbitrary projects, /han-release to cut a release (and update CHANGELOG), and /update-pr-description for PR bodies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。