「artifact」の検索結果

Prove a UI or generation feature actually works before asking a human to look at it. Covers A/B-ing an imported design against its source render, driving controls headlessly so a dead button cannot ship, proving the generator really spawns, and launching the real host (VCV Rack, a DAW). Use before any "take a look" on imported UI, plugin shells, or prompt-to-artifact pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, inspect, plan, apply, remove, pack, and scaffold local Pulp package manifests. Use for Pulp-native source/UI/template kits and for untrusted or semi-trusted manifest-bearing artifacts that must be reviewed before project mutation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research, author, validate, render, and archive data-only Pulp Sample Heritage profiles. Use when creating or revising a sampler character profile, importing or exporting Heritage JSON, proving profile behavior with analytic and listening fixtures, recording evidence and trademark-safe provenance, or preparing a caller-owned profile artifact bundle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Pulp's MIT-safe Cmajor support lane via source-owned patches, an external `cmaj` toolchain, and explicit generated-artifact workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EEG preprocessing and analysis — filtering, artifact removal, time-frequency decomposition, and ERP workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Engineer the full context a model sees — system prompts, retrieved knowledge, tool definitions, state, and history as one designed artifact. Use when moving beyond prompt tweaks to systematic context design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate readiness to advance between development phases. Produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict with specific blockers and required artifacts. Use when user says 'are we ready to move to X', 'can we advance to production', 'check if we can start the next phase', 'pass the gate'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts. Use when user asks 'where are we in development', 'what stage are we in', 'full project audit'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brownfield onboarding — audits existing project artifacts for template format compliance (not just existence), classifies gaps by impact, and produces a numbered migration plan. Run this when joining an in-progress project or upgrading from an older template version. Distinct from /project-stage-detect (which checks what exists) — this checks whether what exists will actually work with the template's skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating, maintaining, debugging, or reviewing real-browser end-to-end tests with Playwright or Cypress, including Page Object models, CI artifacts, traces, flaky tests, cross-page visual regression, and critical user journeys such as login, payment, permissions, or CRUD. For layer planning or tests close to UI components, choose the matching testing workflow first; Chinese triggers include E2E, end-to-end testing, Playwright, Cypress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study unfamiliar codebases and produce evidence-backed knowledge artifacts. Use for repository orientation, architecture mapping, subsystem tracing, onboarding, or codebase documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate OpenClaw release candidates through OCM using the built OpenClaw artifact, a broad reusable scenario matrix, copied existing-user state, clean new-user state, concise pass/fail reporting, and focused failure notes. Use when asked to test OpenClaw origin/main, release readiness, upgrade behavior, plugins, services, channels, doctor recovery, packaging, or broad release risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Research Scientist — designing an ablation to attribute an empirical gain, budgeting an NSF CISE proposal against page and content limits, deciding what reproducibility artifacts to release with a paper, screening a draft for mathiness or terminology misuse, or scoping the consent/ethics review needed before running an experiment on real users.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous cross-study meta-analysis of scRNA-seq data from ENCODE, integrating multiple single-cell transcriptomic datasets for a tissue/cell type. Use when the user wants to answer "what cell types exist in my tissue and what genes define them?" by combining scRNA-seq data across donors, labs, and platforms. Follows the Mawla et al. 2019 framework for assessing cross-study reproducibility, TIN-based quality filtering, and detection-limit-aware interpretation. Handles batch correction (Harmony/Seurat), dropout awareness, cross-contamination artifacts, and platform-specific biases. Use this skill for ANY scRNA-seq integration task, cross-dataset comparison, cell atlas construction, or reproducibility assessment involving ENCODE single-cell data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and work with ENCODE single-cell genomics data including scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Use when the user asks about single-cell experiments, cell type resolution, clustering from ENCODE data, deconvolution of bulk signals using single-cell references, or comparing single-cell vs bulk profiles. Covers platform differences (10X Chromium, Smart-seq2, Drop-seq), quality limitations of single-cell data, multimodal integration (RNA+ATAC), and cross-study reproducibility concerns. Also use for cell type annotation, gene detection limits, dropout artifacts, and single-cell data structure in ENCODE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify implementation matches OpenSpec change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving. Also use when the user says "openspec verify" or "opsx verify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new OpenSpec change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation. Also use when the user says "openspec propose" or "opsx propose".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for Tauri v2 production builds, signing, and distribution artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。