2,520 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Think and work like an expert Membrane Biophysicist. Use when a task calls for Membrane Biophysicist judgment. Reasons from Helfrich elasticity, Lo/Ld phase behavior, and intrinsic curvature; builds GUVs, SLBs, nanodiscs, and BLMs; reads Laurdan GP, FRAP/FCS, aspiration, and electrophysiology while treating multilamellarity, detergent carryover, and probe misinterpretation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Ethologist. Use when a task calls for Ethologist judgment. Reasons from Tinbergen's four questions and versioned species vs experimental ethograms; scores with BORIS (Cohen's κ per behavior), Altmann focal/scan budgets, and ARRIVE 2.0/study-plan lab reporting while treating observer expectation, field–lab arena mismatch, habituation, and pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Foundation Engineer. Use when a task calls for Foundation Engineer judgment. Reasons from effective stress, ULS versus SLS limit states, and construction-altered soil behavior through CPT/SPT logging, triaxial and oedometer testing, LRFD φ-factor checks, and LPILE/PLAXIS analysis while treating liquefaction-driven lateral spread, negative skin friction downdrag, differential settlement, and scour as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Cognitive Neuroscientist. Use when a task calls for Cognitive Neuroscientist judgment. Reasons from latent constructs through converging behavior, fMRI/M/EEG, TMS, and lesion evidence; designs factorial and dissociation contrasts, fMRIPrep/GLMsingle/MNE pipelines, MVPA/RSA, and COBIDAS reporting while treating pure insertion, reverse inference, motion confounds, and in-sample decoding as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trading psychology, risk management discipline, position sizing psychology, drawdown management, behavioral bias mitigation, emotional discipline framework, loss aversion control
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Restructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right layer', 'simplify this code', or 'improve this structure'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full enhancement pipeline for an existing Lattice skill — rewrites a molecule or atom to modern-capable-model grade: restores degraded grammar, deduplicates, hardens gates and branching to one-unambiguous-action precision, verifies zero behavioral loss against a pre-capture diff, then runs the combined QA gate (skill-review, skill-tighten, skill-validate) and an independent fresh-context verifier, fixing everything found. Consumer-first: optimized for first-time open-source users on fresh repos with minimal .lattice/ setup, running capable models. Use when the user says 'enhance this skill', 'upgrade this molecule', 'modernize this skill', 'optimize this skill', 'make this skill production grade', 'full enhancement', 'polish this molecule like design-blueprint', or names a molecule/atom to overhaul. For gap-finding only use skill-review; for conventions only use skill-validate — this skill runs the whole loop end to end.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply test quality principles when generating or reviewing test code. Enforces Arrange-Act-Assert structure, one behavior per test, assertion quality, test isolation, meaningful naming, and test data management. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, or when the user mentions 'write tests', 'test this', 'test quality', 'test review', 'improve tests', or 'test structure'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the craft of writing individual test cases -- not what to test (that is driven by the code being implemented) but how to write tests that are reliable, readable, and maintainable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit any Lattice SKILL.md for language compliance — removes rationale prose, converts soft language to imperatives, adds STOP: gates on hard rules, and cuts redundant repetition. Complements skill-review (which finds behavioral gaps) by fixing phrasing that causes agents to skip or underweight instructions at runtime. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'tighten this skill', 'clean up the language', 'make this more effective', 'reduce the bloat', 'tighten the language', or 'skill tighten'. Standalone — does not call other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply obsidian markdown as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests obsidian markdown behavior or files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply obsidian bases as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests obsidian bases behavior or files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply adhd-friendly communication as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests adhd-friendly communication behavior or files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply memory management as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests memory management behavior or files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal publisher module for /codeck. Exports deck to PDF or PPTX with post-export QA. User-facing export requests should enter through /codeck; this skill defines the export behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing or modifying behavior that must stay consistent across TUI and Web (mode/input/tool/replay/order). Require canonical semantics first, then TUI/Web adapters, then renderer-specific UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when changing REPL clear/reset/resume/surface behavior (onClearTerminal, transcriptSeq remount, Ink Static paths, Ctrl+O/Ctrl+E transitions). Enforces single-owner reset transaction and prevents black-screen/flicker/duplicate-row regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing or debugging Formax permissions/policy/approval behavior and UI (allow/ask/deny rules, workspace boundaries, approval prompts, and /permissions overlay parity with Claude Code).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when code has gone through repeated rework and may contain redundant logic, style drift, or tangled structure. Trigger when user asks for "返工收敛", "cleanup-pass", or requests a focused cleanup pass that reduces churn without changing behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal — for Boundless team members only. Query AWS CloudWatch logs for Boundless services (provers, slasher, distributor, order stream, order generator, indexer, signal) on prod/staging environments. Use when the user asks to look at service logs, debug service behavior from log output, search logs for a request ID, or investigate errors using CloudWatch. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal — for Boundless team members only. Cross-reference Boundless indexer API data, broker telemetry, and service logs to investigate production and staging operational issues. Use when the user wants to understand why slashings happened on prod/staging, diagnose prover or service failures in deployed environments, correlate market events with broker behavior, investigate fulfillment rate drops, look at prover/service logs, or perform any analysis that requires combining on-chain indexer data with off-chain broker telemetry and CloudWatch logs. Also use when the user asks to "investigate", "diagnose", or "find root cause" for prover, service, or market issues on live networks. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting creative work (features, components, functionality, or behavior changes) to clarify user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, auditing, scoring, or improving a real or synthetic MATLAB AI tutor transcript, tutoring prompt, generated lesson, exercise, feedback sequence, or skill behavior for MATLAB accuracy, active learning, assignment guardrails, feedback quality, debugging support, transfer prompts, and instructor-facing quality recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and adapt MetaX attention backends, MLA, sparse indexers, cache layouts, and their kernel wrappers against a target vLLM revision and the actually installed MetaX component APIs. Verify dispatch, supported configurations, and GPU numerical behavior. Use for attention adaptations outside vllm_metax/patch/; do not apply monkey-patch headers or patch audit requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain system behavior, request flows, architecture, or implementation logic as short 4chan-style greentext lines. Use when the user asks for a step-by-step explanation, says "explain the logic", asks for "greentext", or wants terse sequential reasoning with each line starting with `>`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。