2,760 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Find and evaluate creators, influencers, affiliates, and UGC partners using audience fit, content fit, authentic product adjacency, engagement quality, public contactability, commerce signals, and brand-safety evidence—not follower count alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mine comments and replies on social posts, videos, and ads for recurring customer language, questions, objections, desired outcomes, complaints, product requests, purchase signals, and creative opportunities. Use for voice-of-customer research grounded in linked source evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test product-demand hypotheses using public customer language, search and social signals, competitor offers, reviews, comments, creator content, and social-commerce evidence before committing to a product, launch, offer, or campaign.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a company or brand from its website and produce a reusable Brand Core covering products, audience, competitors, positioning, offers, messaging evidence, voice, and visual identity. Use before growth, ad, content, creator, or product work when reliable brand context is missing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a short-form video ad from an evidence-backed angle and the selected template's actual recipe. Reuses or fetches ad-angle-miner, preserves the chosen angle, plans words and visuals together, checks product claims and production fit, and delivers the strongest script with useful alternatives. Use before video production and for script rewrites. Customer language is one input alongside audience, promise, product proof, offer and format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full video production sequence with script review, actual ingredient choices, controlled generation, editing, evidence-based quality review, polish, captions and delivery. A host binding supplies project storage, authentic approvals, provider access and billing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assigns GO terms, Pfam/InterPro domains, KEGG orthologs, EC numbers, and product names to predicted proteins using eggNOG-mapper (orthology), InterProScan (domain signatures), and KofamScan (KEGG), routing specialized functions to dbCAN/antiSMASH/AMRFinderPlus/SignalP. Covers the orthology-vs-domain-vs-homology paradigms, the annotation-error percolation cascade, domain-presence-is-not-function, GO IEA circularity in enrichment, evidence tiering, and bit-score/coverage thresholds. Use when adding functional annotation to predicted genes, choosing between eggNOG-mapper and InterProScan, or judging how much to trust a functional label.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma, Schwede & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2021 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Queries ClinVar for variant pathogenicity classifications, ClinGen VCEP curations, and somatic-vs-germline interpretations via REST API, weekly VCF, or bulk XML. Use when determining clinical significance, triangulating conflicting interpretations, or aggregating evidence against the ACMG/AMP framework with ClinGen SVI specifications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts whether a DNA variant alters mRNA splicing using sequence-based deep-learning tools — SpliceAI (10kb context dilated CNN, clinical default), Pangolin (multi-tissue), MMSplice (modular per-region CNN with calibrated ΔPSI), SpliceTransformer/TrASPr (tissue-aware transformers), SpliceVault (empirical 300K-RNA lookup of likely mis-splicing outcomes), CADD-Splice (composite score). Applies the ClinGen SVI 2023 framework for ACMG/AMP variant interpretation (PVS1, PP3, BP4 evidence codes), HGVS splicing nomenclature (c.123+1G>A, c.123-3T>G, r.spl?), extended-window scoring for deep-intronic pseudoexons, tissue-specific predictions, branchpoint variant detection (BPHunter, LaBranchoR), and splice-switching ASO design. Use when interpreting splice impact of clinical variants, prioritizing VUS, identifying deep-intronic pathogenic variants, or designing ASOs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs cis-pQTL Mendelian randomization for drug-target validation using UKB-PPP (Olink), deCODE (SomaScan), Fenland, INTERVAL, ARIC, and FinnGen-PPP proteomes plus colocalization triangulation, phenome-wide on-target adverse-effect scans, cross-platform Olink/SomaScan replication, and PAV (protein-altering variant) sensitivity. Use when nominating or de-risking a drug target from plasma-proteome GWAS, mimicking pharmacological inhibition via cis-pQTL instruments, separating shared-causal from LD-confounded signal under the Schmidt 2020 cis-MR framework, screening on-target adverse phenotypes pheWAS-style, or producing publication-grade STROBE-MR plus PP.H4 evidence for a target gene.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture and review Agent Skill observations, and create, run, diagnose, or iteratively improve Skill evaluations (evals) with the skill-up CLI. Use when the user asks to record explicitly attributed Skill usage or feedback; review observations or user-supplied traces/transcripts; turn an approved observation into a regression case; evaluate, test, regress, verify, fix, improve, iterate, or evolve a Skill; add or strengthen eval cases; write eval.yaml/case.yaml; run skill-up run/validate/list-cases/report/import/init; or migrate from Anthropic evals.json. Plugin observation capture/review require either the Codex skill-up plugin or an observer-enabled DSH skill-up plugin. User-supplied external evidence can be reviewed without a plugin; evaluation remains multi-engine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a high-quality deep-reading note for a single paper and write it into an Obsidian-style vault. Use when the user gives a paper title, DOI, URL, arXiv ID, Zotero item, or local PDF and wants a polished Markdown note with strong structure, evidence-based analysis, and figure placeholders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Profile, diagnose, and remediate SwiftUI runtime performance using code review, Instruments, and repeatable measurements. Use when a SwiftUI screen renders slowly, scrolling or animations hitch, view bodies update excessively, list identity churns, layout work spikes, or broad Observation dependencies raise CPU cost. Covers evidence-based triage, SwiftUI Instruments lanes, lazy-container guardrails, state lifetime, and before/after verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits App Store submission readiness and rejection risk across current review guidelines, PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy and required-reason APIs, privacy labels, ATT, StoreKit payments, metadata, entitlements, widgets, and Live Activities. Use when preparing a submission, responding to rejection, reconciling privacy evidence, or separating upload blockers from cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing or analyzing an iOS .memgraph, especially when the task mentions a memory leak, heap growth, persistent memory increase, ownership path, or matched-capture comparison with Apple CLI tools. Covers unambiguous Simulator capture, leaks/heap/vmmap/malloc_history evidence, raw artifact preservation, and same-flow verification. Use debugging-instruments for interactive Xcode Memory Graph, Instruments, generic retain-cycle inspection, or LLDB work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'conference talk', 'seminar slides', 'thesis defense', 'research presentation', 'academic deck', 'academic presentation'. Also triggers when the user asks to 'make slides' in combination with academic content (e.g., 'make slides for my paper on X', 'create a presentation for my dissertation defense', 'build a deck for my grant proposal'). This skill governs CONTENT and STRUCTURE decisions. For the technical work of creating or editing the .pptx file itself, also read the pptx SKILL.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify UI changes", "test every screen and action", "run regression QA", "check a deployed UI", or "validate an extension release". Test known web and browser-extension workflows on localhost, staging, or production with action coverage, recovery, localization, accessibility, and real integration evidence. Use dogfood for open-ended bug discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate, sign, and verify SBOMs and provenance attestations to secure the software supply chain. Use when implementing SLSA controls, artifact trust policies, or compliance evidence for releases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ctx as working memory for prior agent work. Before starting or continuing work in an unfamiliar area, resuming earlier work, or revisiting an investigation, search prior sessions to ground yourself in earlier context. Use ctx blame to trace a line, file, commit, or PR to the agent session that produced it. Use when prior decisions, constraints, attempts, tool calls, transcript evidence, or code provenance may matter. Use ctx graph queries on indexed projects to follow calls and dependencies and understand what a change might affect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Amazon brand protection toolkit. Detect hijackers, counterfeits, and unauthorized sellers. Includes MAP violation monitoring, trademark abuse detection, complaint templates for Brand Registry, and test buy evidence collection guides. No API key required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。