「expo」の検索結果

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodological sub-requirements for Art. 21(2) and the significant-incident thresholds binding on DNS/cloud/data-centre/MSP/MSSP/trust-service and other digital entities. Use for NIS2 readiness, transposition questions, ENISA technical implementation guidance, significant-incident thresholds, supervisory differences between essential and important entities, and cross-border coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find Agent Skills for a goal the user cannot name yet, then export an installable bundle. Use when they ask which skills fit a project. Don't use for installing named skills, authoring skills, or catalog maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a ForgeCAD MJCF export in MuJoCo with dynamics, contacts, controls, joint travel, and rendered evidence before calling it simulation-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or edit a manufacture-realistic `.forge.js` model in a project, then validate it with run, render, inspect, and export evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ForgeCAD model authoring, editing, debugging, and execution guidance for .forge.js, SVG-import, assembly, and CLI workflows. Use when building or modifying ForgeCAD geometry, structuring multi-file projects, validating scripts, or using ForgeCAD export/render tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that Codex Slides changes are durably reflected in project state and visibly reflected in the exact Codex Browser slide, panel, version, checkpoint, or presentation surface. Use after creation, rendering, editing, restyling, mark edits, speaker-note changes, version restores, or export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, research, revise, restyle, present, inspect, and export Codex Slides slide decks from Codex, including scenario workflows, project Design Files, and always-on brand design systems. Use when the user asks for a presentation, PPT/PPTX, slide deck, research brief converted into slides, an existing deck edit, a marked-up slide revision, brand/style controls, project files, or to open and operate Codex Slides in the Codex in-editor Browser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and recover from Codex Slides plugin, MCP, Browser handoff, local runtime, durable run, project resume, rendering, Design Files, export, and version-contract failures. Use when a tool fails, a run stalls, a project appears stale, or Codex and the Browser disagree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds cross-platform mobile applications with React Native and Expo including navigation, native modules, FlatList optimization, and platform-specific code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers with tool definitions, resource providers, prompt templates, and transports. Use when exposing APIs to AI agents, building tool servers, converting OpenAPI to MCP, or creating MCP integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a mobile app", "scaffold React Native project", "create SwiftUI views", "set up Jetpack Compose", "optimize mobile performance", "configure Expo Router navigation", "implement offline-first storage", "submit to App Store", or "profile mobile rendering". Expert mobile development covering iOS (Swift/SwiftUI), Android (Kotlin/Compose), React Native, and Flutter for native and cross-platform applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud posture security across AWS, Azure, and GCP — IAM least privilege, public exposure, encryption, logging coverage, landing-zone guardrails. Use when auditing a cloud account, before a production launch, or after a scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Terraform provider ephemeral resources with the Plugin Framework: the Open/Renew/Close lifecycle, ephemeral schema design, registration via EphemeralResources, renewal for expiring credentials, and how ephemeral values flow into write-only attributes and provider configuration. Use when adding an ephemeral resource, exposing secrets/tokens/certificates that must never persist in state or plan, deciding between an ephemeral resource and a data source, or wiring short-lived credentials from one provider into another.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a branded PDF report: executive summary, campaign or channel review. "export this as a branded PDF"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sanctions and export control analysis tool for Claude Desktop. Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries. All results sourced and verified in real time — no memory-based answers. Responds in French, English, German, Spanish, Russian and Chinese. Updated 19 May 2026 (EU 20th package, UK SEUC, Cuba EO). Indicative guidance only — not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an application or system — including one built quickly with AI coding agents — needs a security review with regulatory grounding: a STRIDE threat model, a LINDDUN privacy threat model, a dependency exposure screen against live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS data, or a selected, non-exhaustive screen of which EU security obligations (GDPR, NIS2, Cyber Resilience Act, AI Act) may apply and which need determination. Orchestrates the server-enforced threat-modeling workflows of the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector and grounds every regulatory statement in officially published text fetched at answer time — scope, role, and application-date limits stated, never a compliance verdict. Never simulates a workflow and never answers legal questions from model memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits legal AI skills, prompts, workflows, MCP/tool instructions, and agent packages for prompt injection, malicious instructions, unsafe scripts, suspicious metadata, credential exposure, exfiltration paths, persistence mechanisms, and supply-chain risk. Use before installing, importing, publishing, promoting, modifying, or trusting third-party or generated AI skills and legal workflows. Do not use as a generic code review unless skill trust, workflow safety, prompt injection, or supply-chain hygiene is in scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodological sub-requirements for Art. 21(2) and the significant-incident thresholds binding on DNS/cloud/data-centre/MSP/MSSP/trust-service and other digital entities. Use for NIS2 readiness, transposition questions, ENISA technical implementation guidance, significant-incident thresholds, supervisory differences between essential and important entities, and cross-border coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted generation of MCQs (multiple-choice questionnaires) with export to Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot!, and Word. Supports light MCQs (gamified) and in-depth MCQs (evaluative), with single-answer and multiple-answer formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit mathematically, empirically, or technically dense papers for readers outside the author’s specialty, including empirical legal scholarship, law-and-economics models, and legal-technology research. Clarifies terminology, antecedents, study design, and claim–statistic relationships while checking equations, numbers, quotations, and citations against the source. Use to clarify exposition or de-jargonize a technical draft; not to rewrite briefs or doctrinal arguments. Produces an edited draft and audit memo. Full integrity checks and original-format rendering require suitable extraction, code execution, and document tools; otherwise provides proposed edits with verification limits disclosed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews outside counsel invoices and related billing data for an in-house legal department, including LEDES or e-billing exports, OCGs, approved rates, discounts, budgets, AFAs, and staffing rules. Starts with internal comparisons before bringing in external data. Produces invoice review findings, MBR/QBR scorecards, dispute logs, and management reports. For demonstration purposes only and not professional advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。