「light」の検索結果

Synthesis step in the multi-angle technical research pipeline. Receives structured outputs from all four research angles (api-state, ecosystem-research, impact-measurement, codebase-auditor), applies cross-angle signal weighting and conflict resolution, and produces a single synthesized Research section. Invoked by the technical-researcher orchestrator after all angle skills complete. Returns content to the orchestrator — does not write to the backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When setting up local LLM inference without cloud APIs. When running GGUF models locally. When needing OpenAI-compatible API from a local model. When building offline/air-gapped AI tools. When troubleshooting local LLM server connections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed user-interface or CLI presentation behavior for accessibility failures. Use for an independent accessibility perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator discipline plugin documentation index. Load when needing to read about orchestration patterns, delegation rules, or context window management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator context window discipline enforcement. Prevents the orchestrator from reading source files it will not edit, running diagnostic commands that waste context, and rationalizing delegation bypasses. Use when setting up orchestrator guardrails, reviewing delegation discipline, or diagnosing context window waste in multi-agent workflows. Activates PreToolUse hooks that surface decision points before source file reads and diagnostic command execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a Perl script", "create Perl code", "modern Perl best practices", "Perl 5.30+", "use strict warnings autodie", or mentions Perl pragmas, subroutines, error handling, or scripting patterns. Provides comprehensive Perl 5.30+ development guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to lint Perl code, run perlcritic, check Perl style, format Perl code, run perltidy, or mentions Perl Critic policies, code formatting, or style checking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a change for material performance regressions or unbounded resource behavior. Use for an independent performance perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a code change for correctness-maintainability defects not owned by a narrower security/performance/accessibility perspective. Use for an independent quality perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a change for security defects such as secret exposure, injection, authentication/authorization failures, unsafe deserialization, and dependency risk. Use for an independent security perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load the shared verdict, punch-list, SKIP, and gate schema used by the dh multi-perspective review orchestrator, reviewers, and synthesizer. Use only when one of those components must produce, parse, validate, or gate review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace bugs, CI failures, and unexpected behavior from reproduced evidence to a causal mechanism and governing contract. Distinguish product, architecture, test-oracle, and harness defects; investigate intermittent failures with controlled experiments and report unresolved evidence explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works backward from the stated goal through its prerequisite chain — what must exist to reach the goal, then what each of those requires, back to the current state — classifying each prerequisite as AVAILABLE, DERIVABLE, or MISSING, and blocking planning until nothing is MISSING. Use before creating plans, delegating to agents, or defining acceptance criteria. Activates on specs, PRDs, tickets, RFCs, architecture designs, and multi-step engineering tasks. Always pass `#N` or an inline goal — invoking with no argument and no inline context returns BLOCKED. Integrates with CoVe-style planning pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or updating the project skill discovery config — generates or regenerates .dh/skill_discovery.yaml by scanning the repo to infer tech stack, inventorying installed skills via npx skills list, loading candidate skill content before suggesting, and writing a config-driven skill injection file. Triggers on /dh:setup-skill-discovery invocations and programmatic --auto calls from add-new-feature Phase 3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing a task the orchestrator dispatched — reads the task and its orchestrator response from the work ledger, loads task-level skills, implements against acceptance criteria, records divergences and the completion report as task sections, and closes the attempt. Triggers on task execution within the implement-feature loop or when an agent picks up a specific task from a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Where a dispatched step puts its output, and how it signals state upstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synchronize existing documentation with an observed code/configuration/API change while preserving each document's purpose and authority. Use after implementation changes can make documentation stale, incomplete, or internally inconsistent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize multiple independent structured review verdicts into one lossless deduplicated punch list. Use when findings from several review perspectives must be merged without inventing, dropping, or changing source verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposes a contextualized plan into atomic, independently executable tasks with complete embedded context, registered through the plan API. Use after SAM Stage 3 Context Integration produces the contextualized plan artifact — when the plan is ready for task generation with CLEAR ordering, CoVe checks, and dependency graphs for parallel execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design validation and maintained regression protection before test authoring. Use for TDD increments, acceptance or regression evidence, test boundary/oracle decisions, and multi-factor interaction coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise. Use to assess whether a test has justified unique protection, detects consequential faults, tolerates valid refactors, earns its lifecycle cost, or deserves strengthening, replacement, consolidation, or removal consideration. Reviews are read-only and evidence-backed, including TDD and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether an implementation plan can achieve its stated outcome before execution. Use to check requirement coverage, task contracts, dependencies, data/artifact flow, testability, ownership, impact coverage, and executable ordering without checking whether implementation already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific validation protocol for verifying fixes work through observation, not assumption. Use when claiming a bug fix, code change, refactoring, or implementation is complete — enforces reproduce-broken-state then define-success-criteria then apply-fix then verify-outcome. Success means observing intended behavior, not absence of errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous self-assessment checklist before marking any task as complete. Use when about to claim task completion, before final commit, when user asks "is it done?", or when transitioning from implementation to reporting. Prevents premature completion claims by requiring evidence for every assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。