「planning」の検索結果

Use when module planning and source coverage are done and the run needs writer-ready per-module packs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a `source-tutorial` workspace has ingested sources and needs a grounded tutorial contract before structure planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an approved tutorial spec exists and the run needs a deterministic prerequisite graph before module planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing any MSTest 3.x-to-4.x upgrade or post-upgrade failure. Triggers include "MSTest v4 breaking changes"; CS0507/CS0103/CS1061/CS1615; ExecuteAsync, CallerInfo, DisplayName, or custom TestMethodAttribute; ClassCleanupBehavior; ContainsKey; ThrowsExactly or ExpectedException; IsInstanceOfType out parameters; TestTimeout.Infinite; ManagedType; net6/net7 compatibility; TestCase.Id history; TestName in ClassInitialize; TreatDiscoveryWarningsAsErrors; discovery errors after a clean build; and MSTest.Sdk/MTP or vstest.console discovery changes. Do not use for v1/v2-to-v3 leftovers, framework conversion, runner-only migration, or a general .NET upgrade.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing whenever .NET tests or CI are switching from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP), or an MTP migration behaves differently. Triggers include "switch from VSTest"; MSTest/NUnit/xUnit MTP enablement; OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props; EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner, or YTest.MTP.XUnit2; .NET 10 global.json test.runner and TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport; translating VSTest filters, logger, coverage, blame, or dump arguments; replacing VSTest@3; and exit code 8 or zero tests. Also use for xUnit v3 MTP filters during a v2-to-v3 upgrade. Do not use for framework conversion, TFM, UWP, or WinUI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan complex Blazor UI features by decomposing them into focused components. USE FOR: building a complex Blazor page with multiple sections, planning component decomposition, designing a multi-section dashboard or layout, breaking down a large UI feature into composable components, pages with sidebars and content panels, any page with 3+ distinct visual sections or multiple interacting sub-features, identifying parent-child relationships and data flow. DO NOT USE FOR: creating new Blazor projects or apps from scratch (use create-blazor-project), implementing a single individual component (use author-component), writing component code with parameters and EventCallback (use author-component), or simple single-component pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authorized red team engagement planning, C2 architecture design, attack methodology, lateral movement strategy, OPSEC, and professional reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaborative purple-team operations — threat-informed adversary emulation planning (ATT&CK, CTID, Atomic Red Team, CALDERA), the detect-tune-validate loop, detection coverage measurement (DeTT&CT/Navigator), safe execution and deconfliction, and MTTD/coverage reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Temporal pattern detection and forecasting. Use when analyzing trends over time, detecting seasonality, identifying anomalies in time series, or building simple forecasting models for planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design specifications for effective dashboards. Use when planning new dashboards, improving existing ones, or documenting dashboard requirements before development starts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a user conversationally through generating a new ad video from a template video and a user-provided product image. The host agent performs video understanding, detailed analysis, and rewrite planning; BytePlus Seedance is used only for final video generation with local product images as generation references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search places, resolve addresses, compare routes, inspect neighborhoods, and retrieve geographic or environmental facts through the standalone @cablate/mcp-google-map CLI. Use for concrete location questions; use the travel-planning or local-seo Skill for those specialized outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evidence-backed day trips, multi-day itineraries, and efficient stop sequences with Google Maps data through the standalone CLI. Use when the desired output is a practical travel plan, not merely a route or list of places.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-LLM collaborative brainstorming and planning. Use when user explicitly requests consultation with multiple AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, other LLMs) before presenting an implementation plan, or asks to "consult the council", "ask other models", or "get perspectives from other AIs". Queries external LLM APIs, synthesizes their perspectives, and presents an adapted implementation plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write LaTeX ML/AI review articles for arXiv using the IEEEtran template and verified BibTeX citations. Use when writing, planning, or continuing an arXiv review/survey paper, or when validating and repairing citations in an existing LaTeX project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks for a sequenced learning path within a Buddhist tradition — 学修次第, 先学什么, 从哪入门, 下一步读什么, curriculum, 学习计划, 路径推荐. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel opinion) and /master-debate (adversarial dialectic) by being 纵向 / 时序: stage-by-stage plan keyed on tradition × level (L0-L3) → foundation → intermediate → advanced + blind spots. Trigger is planning intent — "禅宗对比" goes to /compare-masters; "禅宗从哪开始学" goes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when configuring, repairing, planning, or running MiniMax H3 locally on a Windows NVIDIA computer, especially when installation compatibility, component sets, resolution, generation-time budget, path, low-VRAM risk, or H3 prompt mode must be chosen from hardware and user requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or refining a structured Java implementation plan from trusted issue summaries, approved designs, ADRs, OpenSpec changes, existing plans, or a valid combination. The plan records its source artifacts and derivation direction and can remain the execution artifact without requiring OpenSpec. This should trigger for requests such as Create a plan from an issue; Create a plan from OpenSpec; Design an implementation plan; Refine an existing plan. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need Jira CLI (`jira`) installation/authentication guidance and a maintainer-authored Jira issue inventory workflow. The agent does not ingest raw Jira issue or JQL output directly; it asks the Jira project maintainer/operator to author sanitized issue summaries before analysis or @014-agile-user-story handoff. This should trigger for requests such as jira issue list; List Jira issues; Jira JQL issue query; Jira CLI issue workflow. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a framed and root-caused problem needs its assumptions made explicit before design or planning begins — explicit Assumptions, Unknowns, and a Validation plan. This should trigger when an issue's Assumption Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to surface hidden assumptions and unknowns before committing to an approach. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or updating OpenSpec artifacts from an issue, plan, approved design, ADRs, existing OpenSpec, or a valid combination. The workflow assesses reviewable scope, records source authority and derivation, handles conflicts, and prevents silent synchronization. Triggers include Create OpenSpec from an issue; Convert a plan into OpenSpec; Update an OpenSpec change; Split broad requirements into reviewable changes. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。