1,350 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when it is time to make the backend follow the Lean model — regenerate Kotlin from Lean, implement the generated interfaces (UseCase, QueryService, Repository, Entity), wire every generated contract test, make the build green, then run the design and SQL reviews. Backend comes after the human confirmed the screens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kelly's market-intelligence desk (Busabase App-in-Skill). Merges passive competitor monitoring (Radar), agent-run deep research with approved briefs and cited reports (Research), and keyword/topic demand signals (Trends) over one Busabase-backed snapshot, watchlist, and review model. Use when the user invokes $kelly-radar or /kelly-radar, or asks for competitor monitoring, market intelligence, market research, research reports, trends, rising keywords, pricing changes, product launches, changelog diffs, competitor reviews, funding or hiring news, or opportunity triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub pull request review desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) using the gh CLI for real GitHub access, an AirApp review UI for human approval, and a trusted gh pr review execution step. Use when the user invokes /kelly-pr-review or $kelly-pr-review, asks to review GitHub PRs, generate a PR review batch, approve/comment/request changes through the review UI, or execute approved GitHub reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Influencer/creator marketing command desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) — the agent sweeps and fit-scores creator candidates, drafts outreach and briefs, and gates content before it ships; the human reviews creator cards, approves outreach/briefs/contracts, and tracks campaign ROI. Use when the user invokes $kelly-creators or /kelly-creators, mentions influencer or creator marketing, creator discovery, fit scoring, outreach DMs, campaign briefs, UGC, sponsorship or partnership deals, content review / FTC disclosure gating, or campaign ROI, or wants to review/approve agent-drafted creator outreach before it is sent through other channels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Personal App-in-Skill voice-of-customer desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) aggregating user feedback from support email, Discord/Slack communities, X replies, app-store reviews, surveys, and interviews into clustered feature requests and a roadmap decision queue. Use when the user invokes $kelly-feedback or /kelly-feedback, or mentions user feedback, voice of customer, feature requests, roadmap decisions, feedback clustering, feedback triage, request dedupe, changelog replies, decline replies, or reviewing what users are asking for.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates and maintains competitive battlecards from win/loss data, competitor intel, G2 reviews, and sales feedback. Use when building battlecards for a specific competitor, updating existing battlecards with new intel, preparing BDRs or AEs for competitive deals, analyzing win/loss patterns against a competitor, or responding to a competitor's product launch or pricing change. Also use when asked to "build a battlecard," "update competitive intel," "how do we beat [competitor]," "what do we say when a prospect mentions [competitor]," or "analyze our win/loss against [competitor]." Designed for B2B SaaS teams selling against known competitors in deals with multi-persona buying committees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate structured post-incident reviews to identify root causes, document what worked and failed, and produce actionable recommendations to improve future incident response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check your work with a verification subagent. Spawns a verifier that reviews diffs, runs builds and tests, and evaluates correctness. Use when asked to "check work", "verify changes", "self-verify", "/check", "/verify", "/check-work", or "/self-verify".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize tool descriptions in ToolUniverse JSON configs for clarity and usability. Reviews descriptions for missing prerequisites, unexpanded abbreviations, unclear parameters, and missing usage guidance. Use when reviewing tool descriptions, improving API documentation, or when user asks to check if tools are easy to understand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to process automated PR review feedback (Copilot, Greptile, Codex) and iterate until all AI threads are addressed, checks are green, and the PR is merge-ready. Trigger when the user says "address review feedback", "recycle reviews", or references an automated reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and rank an entire SCF round end-to-end from a CSV export. Supports Open Track, Integration Track, and RFP Track with track-specific scoring dimensions. Reads submission data directly from an Airtable CSV, auto-detects columns, categorizes, runs parallel batch reviews, cross-batch calibration, and final ranking. All output is markdown. Use when you have a CSV export of an SCF Build Award round and need to review, score, and rank every submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a design doc with expert sub-agents
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate system boundaries and architectural tradeoffs. Use for architecture decisions, design reviews, and ADRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review changes for correctness, security, accessibility, and performance. Use for scoped quality reviews or verification plans; bug fixes use oma-debug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Docker image reviews, optimization, and step-building guidance. Analyzes Dockerfiles for best practices, security issues, and anti-patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates, debugs, and optimizes GitHub Actions workflow YAML files. Recommends current action versions with SHA pinning from a daily-updated index of 120+ actions. Configures matrix builds, dependency caching, reusable workflows, OIDC authentication, secrets management, and runner selection. Reviews existing workflows for outdated actions, security issues, and performance problems. Use when the user asks about GitHub Actions, workflows, CI/CD, .github/workflows, any action by name (actions/checkout, setup-node, setup-python, etc.), or workflow optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensures designs meet accessibility requirements including WCAG compliance, color contrast, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, and focus management. Reviews designs for accessibility issues and provides recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews UI components for WCAG compliance, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and screen reader support. Use when building frontend components or user requests accessibility improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PSR-1 and PSR-12 coding standards knowledge base for PHP 8.5 projects. Provides quick reference for basic coding standard and extended coding style with detection patterns, examples, and antipattern identification. Use for code style audits and compliance reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to run real accessibility tests — Playwright keyboard interactions, axe-core scanning, visual regression, and WCAG 2.2 compliance checks. The measurement layer that feeds evidence into a11y-critic reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects content similarity, verifies standardized citations and abbreviations, and flags potential academic integrity risks; use it before submission, during academic writing QA, or for compliance reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。