2,073 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when SAM Stage 5 Execution has completed and task results need independent verification against acceptance criteria. Dispatches a separate reviewer agent to fact-check implementation outputs and returns COMPLETE or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings and remediation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the plan_ref returned by add-new-feature is provided. Executes the SAM implementation loop — opens an attempt per ready task, dispatches each to a specialist agent in parallel, settles and judges what comes back, manages bookend tasks (T0 baseline capture and TN verification), and tracks concerns and contract violations per task. Drives task state through the work ledger via the SAM CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes SAM Stage 5 — opens an attempt on a single ARTIFACT:TASK, dispatches it to a fresh stateless agent session, runs quality gates, and records an ARTIFACT:EXECUTION with implementation results and verification output on the task. Use when Stage 4 Task Decomposition is complete and tasks are ready for execution, when re-executing a task after Stage 6 returns NEEDS_WORK, or when dispatching a task to a language-appropriate specialist agent via the development harness pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify multiple factual claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content. Extracts discrete claims, delegates each to the canonical factual-verification process, and aggregates VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE results. Use for "fact check", "verify claims", or a set of unverified factual assertions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when orchestration or planning agents are producing task plans, task prompts, or TASK.md instructions that must be unambiguous, verifiable, and resistant to hallucination. Applies CLEAR (Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive, Reflective) to structure and write agent task prompts, then adds CoVe (Chain of Verification) checks where accuracy risk is meaningful. Activates on draft task prompts, swarm plans, migration tasks, and multi-step plans requiring independently executable steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register a plan artifact via the MCP backlog server. Use when you produce a document or report that downstream agents or worktree-isolated environments need to retrieve — feature-context, codebase-analysis, architect, T0-baseline, TN-verification, or research artifacts. Triggers include "store an artifact", "register a plan artifact", "write a report to the backlog", "upload artifact content".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when all tasks for a feature are marked COMPLETE — runs holistic quality gates including code review, feature verification, integration check, documentation drift audit and update, and context refinement. Creates follow-up plans when issues are found.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze the causal system-wide impact of a proposed change across behavior, interfaces, state/data, runtime dependencies, tests, documentation, controls, people/processes, and model/prompt/context behavior. Use before planning when lexical reference search is insufficient to establish blast radius and verification obligations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bulk-refresh research entries in ./research/ using parallel research-curator agents. Use when /refresh-research is invoked, stale research needs updating, or bulk re-verification of research entries is requested. Inventories entries by review date and age, runs RT-ICA pre-flight, spawns agents in waves of 5, then validates, reviews, and commits through research-curator. Supports --all, --stale, --category, --layer, and --dry-run flags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install and configure the GitHub CLI (gh) for AI agent environments where gh may not be pre-installed and git remotes use local proxies instead of github.com. Use when gh command not found, shutil.which returns None, need GitHub API access for issues or PRs or releases or workflow runs, or repository operations fail with 'failed to determine base repo' error. Provides auto-install script with SHA256 verification, GITHUB_TOKEN auth with anonymous fallback, and the required -R flag pattern for proxy environments. Covers project management via GitHub Projects V2, milestones via REST API, issue lifecycle templates, and label taxonomy management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operates or audits a live Qualtrics survey through the v3 APIs without disrupting fielding. Covers publish gating, quotas, flow routing, embedded data, panel-vendor redirects, read-back verification, and a read-only pre-fielding audit. Use when publishing or patching a fielding instrument, when a quota counts without blocking, when configuring panel-vendor redirects or flow gates, or when auditing a survey before launch for consent gates, force-response completeness, quotas and redirects, anti-bot instrumentation, and language-arm symmetry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs end-stage QA on a finished figure and table set. Checks callouts, numbering, and cross-references, whether numbers in the text match the exhibits, self-contained captions and statistical notes, accessibility and production quality, and links to the SI and replication package. Values that could only be read off an image are marked for author verification rather than estimated. Use when preparing a submission. Design guidance during drafting belongs to figures and tables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate complex work from an active gpt-6-astra or gpt-6.1-sol Codex session. The detected lead owns decomposition, integration, and verification; Astra keeps the hardest reasoning in the lead, while Sol escalates unusually difficult units to Astra. Both route bounded work to Sol at medium effort, mechanical work to Luna, and can use a cross-vendor Claude peer. Not for routine single-context work. Use when the user explicitly asks to orchestrate, delegate, fan out, parallelize, assign subagents, obtain independent checks, or have Codex act as tech lead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate or audit a live Qualtrics survey via the v3 APIs without breaking fielding: publish gating, quotas, flow routing, embedded data, panel-vendor redirects, read-back verification, and a read-only pre-fielding audit. Use when publishing or patching a fielding instrument, when a quota counts but never blocks, or before launch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[AUTO-INVOKE] MUST be invoked when debugging failed on-chain transactions. Covers transaction receipt analysis, gas diagnosis, calldata decoding, revert reason extraction, and state verification. Trigger: any task involving failed tx analysis, revert debugging, or on-chain transaction troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write unit and integration tests for Akka.NET actors using modern Akka.Hosting.TestKit patterns. Covers dependency injection, TestProbes, persistence testing, and actor interaction verification. Includes guidance on when to use traditional TestKit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the backend verification loop after Kotlin/Spring code changes — Kotlin style + unit tests via `gradlew verify`, plus integration tests when repos/migrations changed — and drive fixes until green. Use after editing backend code or when the user asks to verify/check the build.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step-by-step execution of the OWC protocol with mandatory checkpoint at each step. Prevents skipping steps (including verification).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a new IWE skill with proper frontmatter, gates, scaffold and verification. Use when the pilot says: /skill-creator or «создай скилл <name>». The skill enforces WP Gate precondition, Routing Gate, IntegrationGate hard-check, collects parameters in 4 short steps, generates a scaffold SKILL.md from a template, shows a draft, writes files, and reminds about verify-skill.sh.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。