1.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Route an explicitly requested independent/delegated browser QA assignment or durable E2E evidence need; do not trigger for direct Playwright/DOM/console/network inspection, ordinary UI implementation, backend-only work, or production-mutating flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the AILI delivery lifecycle from natural-language IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, and SHIP intent or the equivalent slash shortcuts; use for idea shaping, spec/test definition, bounded BUILD package queues, review-repair closeout, or adapter routing without exposing internal stage commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify a concrete requirements decision, create one bounded static interview packet, or run an explicitly user-invoked frontier batch over a plan, decision, or idea; trigger on explicit grill/interview/refinement intent or a named material ambiguity, not on ordinary planning, implementation, research, test-plan, report-style review, or BUILD work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PR test analysis routing. Use for pull request or diff test impact, changed-test review, CI failure interpretation, and focused test matrix recommendations; do not use for general code review or editing tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refines raw ideas through structured divergent and convergent thinking for ordinary non-command brainstorming, idea shaping, options comparison, and explicit IDEATE deepening routed by `aili-delivery-flow`; do not use as the top-level `/ideate` command owner or for existing-plan stress-test, review, or completion-claim checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a backend service or an end-to-end frontend/backend integration when service/API/data boundaries are the primary deliverable; do not trigger for pure UI, contract design only, security review, test workflow, or every feature touching both folders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, critique, or specify honest charts and data visualizations from known data and audience needs. Use for chart selection, misleading-chart audits, accessibility, dashboard visuals, or "make this data easier to understand"; do not use for raw data analysis, PPT deck generation, spreadsheet surgery, or fabricated chart data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coverage review and verification sufficiency routing. Use when test coverage, uncovered paths, coverage reports, or verification adequacy need a read-only QA review; do not use for writing tests or running browser/E2E artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a bounded security design/hardening pass for explicit security or threat-model intent, or a concrete auth/authorization/secret/untrusted-input/file-upload/sensitive-data risk; do not trigger for every input, data store, third-party call, implementation, review, or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
E2E artifact handling routing. Use when traces, videos, screenshots, reports, or failure bundles need controlled repository-local placement; do not use for simple unit tests or production-mutating E2E flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Flutter/Dart cross-platform apps with widgets, state management, navigation, tests, and performance patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic Go - package and interface design, error wrapping, table-driven tests, generics, the modern standard library (slices/maps/cmp/errors.Join), current syntax, and logging discipline. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring any Go code, especially code drifting toward Java/Spring shapes (deep layer trees, generic repositories, heavy frameworks) - even if the user never says "idiomatic". Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates comprehensive threat models using STRIDE methodology with asset identification, threat enumeration, mitigation strategies, and residual risk assessment. Use for "threat modeling", "security analysis", "STRIDE", or "risk assessment".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements visual regression testing with screenshot comparison, diff detection, and CI integration using Playwright or Chromatic. Use when users request "visual testing", "screenshot testing", "UI regression", "visual diff", or "Chromatic setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates comprehensive unit tests with AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert), edge cases, error scenarios, and coverage analysis. Creates test files matching source structure with complete test suites. Use for "unit testing", "test generation", "Jest tests", or "test coverage".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates factories and builders for generating consistent, composable test data with realistic values and relationship handling. Use for "test factories", "test data builders", "fixture factories", or "test data generation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements security headers and Content Security Policy with safe rollout strategy (report-only → enforce), testing, and compatibility checks. Use for "security headers", "CSP", "HTTP headers", or "XSS protection".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically categorizes test failures, suggests responsible owners, and provides common fix checklists. Generates actionable test reports with failure analysis. Use for "test reporting", "failure triage", "test analysis", or "test automation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secures webhook receivers with signature verification, retry handling, deduplication, idempotency keys, and error responses. Provides verification code, dedupe storage strategy, runbook for incidents. Use when implementing "webhooks", "webhook security", "event receivers", or "third-party integrations".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Market positioning strategy using the April Dunford framework, enriched with JTBD discovery, Moore positioning statement, and Neumeier's Onliness Test. Produces a complete positioning document, positioning statement, competitive alternatives map, and market category analysis. Use when the user wants to define or refine their market positioning, find their unique position, differentiate from competitors, craft a positioning statement, choose a market category, or figure out "how should we position this product." Triggers for "positioning", "how to position", "market position", "differentiation strategy", "positioning statement", "competitive positioning", "category strategy", "where do we fit in the market", "how are we different", "unique value proposition", or any request to define, sharpen, or rethink positioning. Works standalone — no prior startup-design or startup-competitors session needed, but leverages their output if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates environment variables in CI, prevents secret leaks, enforces masking, and provides fail-fast validation with clear documentation. Use for "secrets management", "env var validation", "credential security", or "secret masking".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits database schemas for naming conventions, type consistency, nullability patterns, and missing constraints. Provides violations report with recommended fixes. Use for "schema validation", "database linting", "schema standards", or "consistency checks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates repeatable security review checklist for PRs with required checks, common pitfalls, and automated gating. Use for "security review", "PR checklist", "code review", or "security gates".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。