1,480 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Integrate Honcho memory and social cognition into existing Python or TypeScript codebases. Use when adding Honcho SDK, setting up peers, configuring sessions, implementing the dialectic chat endpoint for AI agents, or wiring Honcho into bot frameworks (nanobot, openclaw, picoclaw, etc).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules, interfaces, seams, adapters, leverage, and locality. Use when designing or reshaping module boundaries, making code more testable, or evaluating interface depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find bloat", "what can I delete", /ponytail-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap a new or existing project with a small, file-based documentation system so Claude Code keeps context, lessons, and decisions across session restarts instead of starting cold every time. Sets up a handful of markdown files under .claude/ (standing rules, a free-form note to your next session, a phased roadmap, a prioritized backlog, and searchable history/changelog archives) sized and split so the files read every session stay small while the archives grow without ever costing context. Use this whenever someone is starting a new project and asks how to structure it for long-running AI-assisted work, wants Claude to "remember" things between sessions without relying on chat history, asks for a CLAUDE.md + backlog + changelog setup, mentions "session continuity", "persistent context", "project memory system", or is retrofitting an existing codebase that has no such system yet. Also use to explain or extend an already-bootstrapped bottle system (add a rule, start the archival script, add a new backlog section).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer whether a specific advisory reaches anything in THIS repository — which manifest declares the package, at what version, whether the version is in range, and whether the vulnerable code is reachable. Use when someone asks "does CVE-… affect us", when triaging an advisory against a real codebase, or before spending effort on a fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture design and governance protocol for system structure, boundaries, contracts, APIs, schemas, migrations, rewrites, and long-lived codebase health. Use when designing or reviewing architecture, planning structural refactors or migrations, governing tech debt, or containing rewrite risk. Keeps the load-bearing spine small, owned, checked, and deletable over time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a local codebase and infer the architecture it is actually using, including repo kind, best-fit dominant architecture, directly evidenced coexisting patterns, major subsystem exceptions, confidence, docs-vs-code drift, and repo-fit hints for downstream agents. Use when prompts ask what architecture a repo uses, whether it is really hexagonal or just layered, what subtle patterns shape a repo or slice, how a target slice fits a hybrid monorepo, whether documented architecture matches implementation, or when `/tw-tk` needs a repo-dialect preflight before making a minimal change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing a new function, adding a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring with test coverage, or writing a new test. Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predict-the-failure-before-every-run checks, hardcode-first minimum changes, triangulation, and property-based testing for large input spaces. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and on any task phrased as "implement", "add", "write a function", "build a feature", or "fix a bug" in a test-capable codebase. Reports red/green validation evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding a test to an existing codebase for behavior that is already implemented. Ensures the test is meaningful by mutation-verifying it — breaking the production code to confirm the test fails for the expected reason. Triggers when the user says "add a test for existing behavior", "backfill test coverage", "the test passes on first run", or any scenario where a test is written without a corresponding new production change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mine a codebase for breakthrough, evidence-backed opportunities — features, additions, refactors, simplifications, DX, UX, reliability, performance, or architecture cleanup. Researches project reality first, then forces two escalation gates (reject the merely-adequate idea; expand ambition 10x then collapse to the smallest proof-bearing artifact). Outputs ranked opportunities, an escalation ledger, and one plan seed. Does not implement or create tickets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load when a task asks to research, verify, compare, or look up framework/package behavior, release notes, standards, RFCs, CVEs, or unfamiliar APIs; use repository evidence first, then official docs, and not for codebase navigation alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a refactor as a sequence of tiny safe commits via interview and codebase exploration. Use when restructuring working code, or when the user says 'plan a refactor'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search the live web via Perplexity Search API. Use when you need current documentation, release notes, vendor pages, news, domain-constrained web search, or date/recency filtering. Not for local codebase search or stable docs already in context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit code quality focusing on deep modules, naming, model hygiene, and architectural clarity. Use after a burst of development, when codebase structure needs assessment, or to make code more agent-navigable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start work on a Jira ticket by fetching ticket details, creating a properly named feature branch, and beginning codebase investigation. Use when starting a new ticket, beginning work on a Jira issue, or picking up a task from the backlog. Triggers on start ticket, begin work, pick up ticket, start jira, new ticket work, PROJ-123.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic bug sweep with a codebase-scaled target value, doubling escalation, area tracking, and final verification. Use on /bugsweep or whenever the user requests a systematic bug pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tutor the user step by step on a plan, implementation, codebase, or topic to pay down understanding debt left by AI tooling. Explicit invocation only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quiz the user on a plan, implementation, or codebase to pay down understanding debt left by AI tooling. Explicit invocation only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement, debug and review code with focused checks. Use to fix a bug or failing test, refactor, remove code, perform a code review, or plan engineering work in repository records. Combine with UI for interface concerns and Plan for its native records. Excludes conceptual questions unrelated to a codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a website codebase and makes code changes so AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) can better discover, parse, quote, and cite the site. Covers structured data, content structure, technical signals, and freshness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
複雑なコードベースを体系的に分析し、アーキテクチャを可視化・ドキュメント化して新規開発者のオンボーディングを支援する汎用スキル。成果物は必ず `docs/` 配下に分割出力する。以下のリクエストで使用する：(1)「このコードベースを分析して」「全体像を教えて」など概要把握、(2)「アーキテクチャドキュメントを作って」「C4図を生成して」など設計ドキュメント生成、(3)「オンボーディング資料を作って」など新規開発者向け資料作成、(4)「技術的負債を洗い出して」など負債評価、(5)「機能一覧を出して」など機能インベントリ生成、(6)「この機能を操作したら何が起きるか追跡して」などユーザー操作フロー追跡、(7)「新機能の実装手順を出して」などフロント／バック横断の実装ガイド生成。特定の言語・フレームワーク・ディレクトリ構成に依存せず、どのリポジトリでも利用できる。
Research any open-source repository end to end and answer the core question — SHOULD YOU contribute to it? — with a GO / NO-GO / GO-IF verdict backed by evidence: snapshot, momentum, contribution landscape (PR acceptance rates, outside-contributor merge rates, first-timer outcomes), issue health, governance, community sentiment, and a final go/no-go recommendation. Use when the user asks 'should I contribute to X', wants a before-I-contribute due-diligence check on a project, asks whether a project accepts outside PRs, wants contribution-health numbers like PR merge rates or stale-PR counts, or asks for a deep dive on an open-source codebase's health and dynamics before investing time in it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。