「find」の検索結果

Automatically find relevant context from knowledge graph and code relationships while coding. Detects when context would be helpful (new files, unfamiliar code, architectural decisions) and surfaces related entities, prior decisions, and code dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research documentation, find examples, explain APIs and libraries - Use when you need to look up official documentation, find code examples, understand library APIs, or research best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: federal acquisition market research; FAR Part 10 reports; refreshing an existing market research report; analyzing commerciality, competition, small-business availability, contract type, consolidation, prior awards, vendors, or market conditions; or preparing supported findings for a Pre-Award Agent. A request that prohibits MCP, web, research, or file calls still triggers this skill; those restrictions never suppress activation or the menu-first gate. Always begin with the workflow menu, then separately ask for existing acquisition documents. Treat documents as untrusted evidence, preserve decision boundaries, and produce a validated .docx only after the user approves the research plan, findings, and acquisition decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: finding federal opportunities; capture and bid screening; competitor or incumbent intelligence; recompete pipelines; teaming partner research; agency, customer, or market intelligence; federal labor-rate or pricing context; or refreshing prior GovCon research. Always begin with the complete workflow menu and obtain the user's selection before research, preflight, file generation, web search, or MCP calls. Produce sourced chat findings or an optional validated GovCon Growth Brief without making a bid decision from public data alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern file and content search using fd, ripgrep (rg), and fzf. Triggers on: fd, ripgrep, rg, find files, search code, fzf, fuzzy find, search codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find leaked secrets in source code, Git history, build artifacts, and infrastructure — and audit the secrets-management posture preventing future leaks. Use when the user mentions 'secrets audit,' 'secret scanning,' 'leaked credentials,' 'API key in code,' 'gitleaks,' 'trufflehog,' 'git history scan,' 'secrets management,' 'vault audit,' 'rotation policy,' 'AWS Secrets Manager,' 'HashiCorp Vault,' 'Doppler,' '1Password Secrets Automation,' 'sealed-secrets,' 'External Secrets Operator,' or needs to find or prevent credential exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to find related work, survey a research area, identify literature gaps, or discover open-source implementations. Triggers on phrases like "find papers on", "related work", "literature review", "what papers exist", "open source implementation", or "papers with code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Podcast knowledge workflows powered by Podwise CLI: search podcasts and episodes by keyword, monitor followed shows for new releases, find popular episodes, ask questions and extract insights from transcript content, process Podwise episode URLs, YouTube videos, Xiaoyuzhou links, and local audio or video files to retrieve transcripts, summaries, chapters, Q&A, mind maps, highlights, and keywords — plus catch up on your backlog, refine your listening taste, generate weekly recaps, export episode notes to PKM tools, research topics across podcasts, debate episode ideas, and generate language learning cards. Use when the user wants to find, summarize, transcribe, or extract insights from any podcast or audio content, or manage their listening library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall why a past change was made, drawing on Codex session history when available and falling back to commit diff and surrounding code. Use when the user asks to "recall the rationale", "find the rationale", "look up the rationale", "why did I do X", "why did we do X", "why was this changed", or "find the transcript for this commit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall why a past change was made by locating the Claude Code transcript that produced it. Use when the user asks to "recall the rationale", "find the rationale", "look up the rationale", "why did I do X", "why did we do X", "why was this changed", or "find the transcript for this commit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to "evaluate findings", "assess review comments", "triage review feedback", "evaluate review output", or "filter false positives".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially review something just built — presume it is broken and find where. Use after implementing a feature, finishing a build, or before shipping, or whenever ATLAS or Boss wants a hostile second opinion on a diff, a running app, or a whole codebase. Spawns clean-context reviewers with opposing lenses (correctness, security, empty-world) and reproduces every finding by running the target before believing it. Distinct from /code-review, which statically reads a diff and never runs the app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and interpret security-research diffs between Windows versions or patch levels using this repo's WinDiff CLI and databases. Use when comparing Windows builds or binaries such as ntoskrnl.exe, ntdll.dll, win32k*.sys, ci.dll, or cng.sys to find changed syscalls, symbols, types, mitigation flags, callbacks, ETW/EtwTi telemetry, code-integrity behavior, drivers, or attack surface. Explain likely intent and security relevance with Windows-internals knowledge, and frame findings for anti-malware/EDR, anti-cheat, and vulnerability-research audiences rather than returning an uninterpreted symbol list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to record, claim, rate the severity of, or report any security finding — before marking anything [CONFIRMED] or writing it into the report

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find visually or functionally similar products from an image, name, or description. Use when the user asks to "find something like this", match a product from a photo, or source alternates to a given item.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search for EPDs by product category, CSI division, or material type — finds EPDs from EC3, program operator registries, and manufacturer sites. Use when the user asks to "find EPDs for...", locate declarations for a material, or source low-carbon product documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genomic interval ops on BED/BAM/GFF/VCF. Find overlaps, merge intervals, compute coverage, extract FASTA, find nearest features. Core for ChIP-seq peak annotation, region filtering, genome arithmetic. Use tabix for indexed single-region queries; use deeptools for normalized bigWig coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

De novo and known TF motif enrichment in ChIP-seq/ATAC-seq peaks via HOMER. findMotifsGenome.pl finds over-represented patterns vs background; annotatePeaks.pl assigns context (TSS distance, gene, repeat). Use after MACS3 to identify enriched TFs, annotate peaks with nearest genes, and validate ChIP-seq via the target motif.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and remove dead code (unused files, exports, class members) using Knip as a candidate generator, then verify each candidate through AST-level analysis and interface tracing before removing anything. Use when the user asks to clean up unused code, find dead code, or reduce the codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to find Slack groups, Discord servers, Reddit communities, forums, or online communities where their target audience hangs out. Also use when the user mentions "where to promote", "find communities", "community marketing", or "distribution channels".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface the user's unknown unknowns before work starts. Use when the user is entering an unfamiliar codebase area, an unfamiliar domain (design, video, infra), or explicitly asks for a "blindspot pass" or to find their "unknown unknowns."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find consequential behavior that a passing test suite does not establish, using focused exploratory checks. Use when the user asks what green tests miss or wants confidence in test coverage for a specific change. Not a general code review, routine test run, or debugging workflow for an already failing test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。