「gap」の検索結果

Use when creating or editing cron jobs - prevents timeouts, silent failures, and delivery gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For example: 32-bit float: 4 bytes per parameter 8-bit integer: 1 byte per parameter (75% memory red GAP: public SDK / programmatic API: competitor si

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A review of AI edge devices and lightweight CNN and LLM deployment — 21. Jan. 2025 · However, deploy GAP: OpenHands has a modular SDK design — our too

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This work studies the post-training quantization of LLM parameters as a way to improve their runtime GAP: multi-agent orchestration: competitor signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase. Use when the user wants to create variables/tokens, build component libraries, create individual components with proper variant sets and variable bindings, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma. Also use when the user asks to create or generate any component in Figma — even a single one — since components require proper variable foundations, variant states, and design token bindings to be production-quality. This skill teaches WHAT to build and in WHAT ORDER — it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API. Both skills should be loaded together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditoria e evolucao do ecossistema de skills. Qualidade de codigo, seguranca, custos, gaps, duplicacoes, dependencias e relatorios de saude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose your taste gaps across six skill areas. Know what to practice. Use when starting a taste development program, checking progress, or identifying specific areas to improve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the discovery, design, validation, and delivery of Agent Skills. Use when identifying skill gaps, creating or revising a SKILL.md, improving skill descriptions, or checking a skill against the Agent Skills specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write focused tdmcp tests for one assigned coverage gap. Use for Vitest/msw unit tests, integration tests, bridge tests, CLI/config/resource tests, and regression tests that should raise coverage without weakening behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey one surface of tdmcp (artist controls, library/packaging, CLI/DX, AI/LLM, or TouchDesigner depth) for candidate NEW features — inventory what exists, cross-check the roadmap, apply the gap-finding lenses, vet each idea, and emit a structured, novelty- and confidence-labelled candidate list to _workspace/discovery/. Use when a td-surveyor agent is scouting a surface during the feature-discovery harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit, continue a previous quality wave, or verify the repo is ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study a merged or shipped tdmcp implementation and extract reusable learnings: code improvements, runtime/UX lessons, test gaps, docs updates, roadmap items, and harness changes. Use when the user asks to learn from a completed feature/project/PR/build, analyze what can be improved from an implementation, or turn a real installation experience into actionable tdmcp improvements. This is a post-implementation learning harness; it does not replace tdmcp-pipeline for building or tdmcp-quality-audit for broad repo audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a project's docs as a static HTML manual on GitHub Pages: check that Pages is enabled, bring the wiki up to date, list the doc gaps, build the site, preview it locally and push it after GO. Use for "publish the docs", "docs site", "put the manual on GitHub Pages".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an offline ASO audit on canonical App Store metadata under `./metadata` and surface keyword gaps using Astro MCP. Use after pulling metadata with `asc metadata pull`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schedule and execute background work on iOS using BGTaskScheduler. Use when registering BGAppRefreshTask for short background fetches, BGProcessingTask for long-running maintenance, BGContinuedProcessingTask (iOS 26+) for foreground-started work that continues in background, background URLSession downloads, or background push notifications. Covers Info.plist configuration, expiration handling, task completion, and debugging with simulated launches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-tests ideas by surfacing assumptions, counterarguments, and confidence gaps. Use when evaluating claims, proposals, plans, or decisions that need rigorous intellectual scrutiny.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a job description, hiring post, or recruitment page for role requirements, evaluation criteria, keywords, risks, and resume or cover letter angles. Use when the user provides a JD URL/text, asks what a company is looking for, wants JD-resume gap analysis, or needs inputs for a tailored cover letter. 한국어 요청도 포함합니다 - 채용공고 분석, 공고 분석, JD 분석, 직무기술서 분석, 자격요건, 우대사항, 이 공고 뭘 원하는지, 공고랑 내 경력 비교.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate;

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: the agent captures a correction from the team lead, hits an unexpected error, discovers a capability gap, or finds a better practice. Logs to .learnings/ and promotes durable patterns to permanent project memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。