3,324 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Academic paper reading and research development system for biomedical researchers. Finds papers via Semantic Scholar, reads with structured notes, tracks discussion insights, and synthesizes literature into a Research Foundation Document (RFD) for downstream protocol design skills. 8 commands: /setup /feed /read /discuss /recap /update /sync /propose
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically maps mechanism evidence for a disease from molecules to pathways, cell types, tissues, biological consequences, and clinical phenotypes. Always use this skill when a user needs a layered mechanism evidence chain rather than a flat summary or immediate gap analysis. Formal literature citations must be real and verifiable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Condenses a full study into conference-submission abstract format. Use when adapting a manuscript abstract or study summary to meet a specific conference's word limit, structured format (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion), character limits, or required section headings. Also triggers on "adapt my abstract for [conference]", "shorten my abstract to 250 words", "reformat for ASCO/ASGCT/SfN/AACR", "I need a conference abstract", or "cut my abstract to fit the word limit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns your protocol and analysis workflow into publication-ready Methods text. Use when writing or revising the Methods section of a biomedical manuscript, ensuring it complies with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD), matches what is in the Results section, and satisfies journal-specific word limits and declarations. Also triggers on "write my methods", "revise my methods section", "how to report my statistics", "what do I need to include in methods for [study type]", or "make my methods CONSORT-compliant".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Acknowledges limitations in sample, design, measurement, and validation in a professional way that improves credibility without undermining the whole paper. Use when writing the limitations paragraph of a Discussion section, preparing a grant risk assessment, responding to reviewers about study weaknesses, or framing scope boundaries for a paper. Also triggers on "write my limitations", "how should I address the limitation of", "reviewer said my sample is too small", or "help me word this limitation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Composes a Discussion around key findings, mechanisms, clinical relevance, and limitations. Use when writing or improving a Discussion section for any biomedical manuscript — including interpreting results, connecting to prior literature, addressing unexpected findings, framing limitations, and writing the conclusion. Also triggers on "write my discussion", "help me discuss my findings", "how do I compare to prior studies", "write the limitations paragraph", or "draft a discussion for my paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes the full Introduction section of a biomedical manuscript based on an approved or sufficiently clear study logic, while preserving evidence boundaries and introduction discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes complete, publication-grade figure legends that can stand on their own. Use when writing or revising figure legends for any scientific figure — bar charts, line graphs, scatter plots, box plots, heatmaps, survival curves, flow cytometry plots, western blots, microscopy images, or schematic diagrams. Also triggers on "write a figure legend for", "help me describe this figure", "my figure needs a legend", "write Figure 1 legend", or "what should a figure legend include".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts biomedical table content into clear manuscript or presentation narrative by prioritizing meaningful patterns, contrasts, and interpretation boundaries rather than restating every number.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes Specific Aims pages for grant applications. Use when drafting or revising the Specific Aims page (NIH R01/R21/R03), NSF Project Summary, or equivalent for any major funding agency. Also triggers on "write my specific aims", "help me draft specific aims for NIH", "what should a specific aims page include", "NSF project summary", "write my grant aims", or "how do I structure an R01".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes the full Results section of a biomedical manuscript from a sufficiently clear result structure, figure inventory, or analysis summary while preserving evidence boundaries and result hierarchy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you run a benchmark or report a speedup or regression you measured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply when concurrent actors might write to the same file, branch, key, or state object. Eliminate the sharing first; serialize structurally only when one shared writer is a real invariant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a UI or design against WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA and ARIA patterns, returning criterion-referenced findings with severity and specific fixes. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, contrast verification, keyboard/screen-reader review, or wants to confirm a component meets POUR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to analyze an existing PostgreSQL database and identify which tables should be converted to Timescale/TimescaleDB hypertables. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Analyze database tables for hypertable conversion potential - Identify time-series or event tables in an existing schema - Evaluate if a table would benefit from Timescale/TimescaleDB - Audit PostgreSQL tables for migration to Timescale/TimescaleDB/TigerData - Score or rank tables for hypertable candidacy **Keywords:** hypertable candidate, table analysis, migration assessment, Timescale, TimescaleDB, time-series detection, insert-heavy tables, event logs, audit tables Provides SQL queries to analyze table statistics, index patterns, and query patterns. Includes scoring criteria (8+ points = good candidate) and pattern recognition for IoT, events, transactions, and sequential data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create logos using AI image generation. Discuss style/ratio, generate variations, iterate with user feedback, crop, remove background, and export as SVG. Use when user wants to create a logo, icon, favicon, brand mark, mascot, emblem, or design a logo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create banners using AI image generation. Discuss format/style, generate variations, iterate with user feedback, crop to target ratio. Use when user wants to create a banner, header, hero image, cover image, GitHub banner, Twitter header, or readme banner.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured CSV security audit reports from vulnerability data with proper filtering and formatting. This skill covers CSV schema design for security reports, using Python csv.DictWriter, severity-based filtering, and field mapping from JSON to tabular format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate Hibernate 5 to Hibernate 6 with Spring Boot 3. Use when fixing HQL/JPQL query parsing issues, removing deprecated Criteria API, updating ID generation strategies, or diagnosing N+1 query behavior changes. Covers breaking changes, type mappings, and performance monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Subtour-elimination methods for TSP, VRP, pickup/dropoff routing, and routing MIPs with binary arc variables. Use when route-continuity constraints may permit disconnected cycles and the model needs MTZ constraints, flow-based connectivity constraints, DFJ subset cuts, or lazy/iterative subtour cuts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write feature specifications as requirements and user stories with acceptance criteria, focusing on business value and testable conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specification creation and management for the Pilot Shell methodology. Covers semantic search, clarifying questions, structured spec generation, and iterative refinement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verification-before-completion discipline ensuring all success criteria are met, tests pass, and reviews complete before declaring work done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。