deps-vet
無料Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after /phx:deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,304 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after /phx:deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scope or freeze which files Claude can edit during debugging, a refactor, or review. Use when edits should stay in specific dirs, or for a read-only investigate lock. Backed by a sentinel + PreToolUse hook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to document Elixir code: add or fill in @moduledoc and @doc for modules and functions. Documents tested code only; may add a README section or ADR. Not for docs lookup or audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Balanced Coupling model for software design. Use when: designing modular architectures, evaluating coupling between components, reviewing code modularity, deciding whether to split or merge modules/services, assessing integration patterns, classifying coupling as balanced or unbalanced, applying DDD strategic and tactical patterns, reasoning about cohesion vs coupling trade-offs, identifying distributed monolith risks, or explaining why a system is hard to change. Provides the three-dimensional framework (integration strength, distance, volatility) and the balance rule for making coupling decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes a codebase's modularity imbalances using the Balanced Coupling model and produces a review of design issues. Use when reviewing existing code for coupling problems, assessing architecture quality, identifying distributed monolith risks, or finding areas where changes are unexpectedly expensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans lyrics for pronunciation risks and prevents Suno mispronunciations. Use when writing lyrics with proper nouns, technical terms, homographs, or non-English words.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs to plan, de-risk, or ground a software engineering / computer science undergraduate thesis from a real codebase before final writing. Trigger for requests such as "根据项目写毕业论文", "先做论文大纲", "用真实项目材料规划论文", "检查论文是否脱离代码", "根据检测报告降查重", "根据AIGC报告改写定稿", "继续在手改初稿上改", or when an existing draft thesis must be reworked against a school format sample. Produces an evidence-backed outline, chapter rewrite plan, figure plan, and handoff package for academic-paper-composer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a dual-lens critical review of the specification and plan from both product strategy and engineering risk perspectives before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product Requirements Document writing - PRD templates, MoSCoW prioritization, user personas, competitive analysis, feature specs, acceptance criteria, risk assessment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify failure modes before they occur using structured risk analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security-focused differential code review with blast radius analysis, risk-adaptive depth (DEEP/FOCUSED/SURGICAL), git history correlation, and structured finding format. Adapted from Trail of Bits. Use when reviewing PRs, commits, or code changes for security implications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commit mesajlarina yapilandirilmis karar trailer'lari ekle. Constraint, Rejected, Confidence, Scope-risk, Not-tested trailer'lari ile karar baglamini koru.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Offer 对比决策器。用户同时拿到两份(或多份)offer 纠结怎么选时,扮演 Senior Career Decision Advisor:结构化对比 comp / 成长 / AI 敞口 / 公司强度 / 团队风险 / 晋升速度 / 生活方式,识别 front-loaded vs long-term upside、resume value、switch-out 难度、hidden risks,最后给一条**明确、有立场、不中性**的推荐(并附「你是 X 类人选 A,你是 Y 类人选 B」的分叉判定)。三步:贴两份 offer → 补 priorities & 现状 → 自动生成并打开一份 HTML Offer Decision Report。是 offer-toolkit 里 JD Skill / Resume Skill / BQ Skill 拿到结果之后的下一环。关键词:offer compare, 选 offer, 两个 offer, offer decision, TC compare, 该去哪家, which offer, 4-year TC, RSU, sign-on, front-loaded, long-term upside, career decision。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implementing multi-layer security scanning (container, SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets), SBOM generation, and risk-based vulnerability prioritization in CI/CD pipelines. Use when building DevSecOps workflows, ensuring compliance, or establishing security gates for container deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Precision-first adversarial bug hunting for runtime, logic, data, concurrency, and security defects. Uses deterministic risk triage, evidence-bounded retrieval, Hunter/Skeptic/Referee review, optional hybrid verification, and explicit immutable Fixer scope. Scan-only and single-pass by default; complete-coverage loops, edits, autonomous fixes, and commits each require explicit intent. Use for code review, security audits, regression hunting, PR review, and evidence-backed remediation planning in skills-capable coding agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codebase reconnaissance agent for Bug Hunter. Maps architecture, identifies trust boundaries, classifies files by risk priority, and detects service boundaries. Does NOT find bugs — finds where bugs hide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Logic coherence pass for per-H3 section files: enforce a clear paragraph-1 thesis and surface paragraph-island risks (connector stats are diagnostic, not a quota) before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when `evidence-review` has an extraction table and needs lightweight risk-of-bias fields.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the free official .NET diagnostics CLI tools for profiling and runtime investigation in .NET repositories. USE FOR: the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application; the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception storms, lock. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing realistic performance tests or load tests with ad-hoc tracing alone; production heap collection when the pause risk has not been. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MANDATORY for static source-to-test pairing: find or list source files/modules without corresponding tests, or suggest test locations from repository structure. Invoke even for a tiny package; do not substitute manual globbing. Uses Roslyn for C#/.NET and tree-sitter for Python, TS/JS, Go, Java, Rust, Ruby, Kotlin, Swift, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR: real line/branch/Cobertura data, coverage-backed test priorities, CRAP risk, or grading existing tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the open-source free `Stryker.NET` mutation testing tool for .NET. Use when a repo needs to measure whether tests actually catch faults, especially in critical libraries or domains. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants Stryker.NET; mutation testing is needed for high-risk code. DO NOT USE FOR: every PR path by default in a large repo; simple coverage collection. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate ManagedCode.Orleans.Graph into an Orleans-based .NET application for grain-call policy enforcement, deadlock detection, live-call telemetry, and Mermaid graph diagnostics. USE FOR: ManagedCode.Orleans.Graph integration; allowed grain transitions; Orleans call filters; live policy graphs; reviewing Orleans call-cycle risk. DO NOT USE FOR: generic graph data modeling or traversal unrelated to Orleans calls. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
火山云通信「通用配置」Skill (通用层). 仅负责跨业务的号码可呼性 / 风控 / 主叫鉴权类查询 QueryRiskDenyInfo / QueryCanCall / QueryAuth. 注意 所有 TTS 模板操作 (创建/更新/删除/查询) 以及录音文件 / 通用资源管理 (create_voice / query_voice / delete_voice / get_upload_url / submit_upload / list_resource / list_usable / update_resource / delete_resource) 均已迁移到 byted-vms-voice-notify (语音通知) skill, 本 skill 不再提供任何 TTS 或录音/资源入口.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate customer-impacting OpenAI Ruby SDK defects and privately handled security risks, then dispatch at most five evidenced, independent fixes to isolated project worktrees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。