2,073 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematically deconstruct written content into verifiable claims, validate each using search/documentation, and facilitate informed discussion through structured interviewing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stop AI agents from secretly bypassing your rules. Mechanical enforcement with git hooks, secret detection, deployment verification, and import registries. Born from real production incidents: server crashes, token leaks, code rewrites. Works with Claude Code, Clawdbot, Cursor. Install once, enforce forever.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[00] TnR ABSOLUTE RIGOR — Systemic Verification Doctrine. Forced cognitive exertion for high-stakes investigations. Mandates absolute deconstruction, mathematical proof chains, and ≥95% derived certainty. Zero-tolerance for heuristics or sentiment-based reasoning. Shortcuts are defined as intentional hallucinations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skeptical analysis and critique of claims, plans, and code without taking anyone at face value. Use when the user says "don't trust me", wants adversarial review, red-teaming, assumption checking, or verification that generated or proposed code is actually correct. Triggers on skepticism, critique everything, verify claims, challenge assumptions, red team, devil's advocate, prove it, smell test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompose a task into safe parallel sub-agent slices with explicit ownership, optional worktree isolation, per-worker plans, verification, and orchestrator-led integration. Use when the user explicitly asks for delegation, sub-agents, or parallel work and the task can be split into non-overlapping scopes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts implementation plans with TDD, documentation updates, and repository verification commands before coding. Use when the user asks for an implementation plan, /create-plan, or structured pre-implementation design for work in encero workspaces (e.g. Incan, IncQL).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain the local RSA-PSS PS256 signing plugin, its public parser, refresh-engine composition, public JWKS, and strict core verification. Excludes portal or OIDC signer selection and remote KMS backends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain upstream OAuth identity-provider directive parsers, shared configuration dispatch, OAuth/OIDC discovery, GitHub identity claims, JWKS and static public PEM verification, EdDSA/Ed25519 token validation, key refresh, and real portal OAuth E2E tests. Excludes portal signing-key publication and gatekeeper-owned direct OAuth sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain authorization-policy OAuth login without an authentication portal, including provider selection, directive parsing, gatekeeper callbacks, opaque sessions, ACL checks, logout, lifecycle, TLS E2E tests, and embedding contracts. Upstream protocol and JWT verification remain with oauth-identity-provider.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain portal TOTP and WebAuthn login checkpoints and enrollment, server-side challenges, factor-specific verification, replay prevention, and real TLS MFA journeys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain portal public signing-key discovery at .well-known/jwks.json, reusable admin API directive parsing, opt-in admin private-key export, KMS key serialization, asymmetric issuer selection, base-path routing, and JWT verification tests. Excludes upstream OAuth provider JWKS consumption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit Source Code: Use when the user wants to "edit" the code base in one shot from a query or a bare analyzer issue id like "P1", fusing crafting, refactoring, and resolving with optional grilling, verification, looping, and Git worktree isolation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating, modifying, debugging, or running Qwik Playwright e2e tests under e2e/, including router, adapters, docs, CLI, and React integration suites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate on-target verification of a program's logic by driving its RTT console with rttsh - write Lua scripts that exercise commands and assert responses, output and timing on real hardware. Use when asked to verify target-side behavior on board, build board-level checks for firmware features, or automate hardware test runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conventions and APIs for the offload-project/laravel-waitlist package — multiple waitlists, entry status tracking, optional email verification, lifecycle events, mailing list sync (Mailchimp/Kit/Audienceful), and bridge into laravel-invite-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM/电工杯 mathematical modeling abstracts, keywords, highlights, first-page claims, or high-density summaries need drafting, revision, audit, or style diagnosis, especially when feedback mentions too many numbers, weak focus, process-listing, empty official prose, buzzwords, missing structure, weak keywords, unsupported values, or first-page claim verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM mathematical modeling papers need lightweight literature search, citation verification, method/background references, standards or policy sources, Chinese-English source routing, DOI/BibTeX checks, or claim-to-citation mapping without fabricated sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for kernel attack surface, namespace and cgroup boundaries, container isolation assumptions, syscall paths, and escape primitive verification. Use when the user asks to analyze container-to-host escape paths, kernel exploit prerequisites, namespace crossover, capability misuse, or prove whether an exploit primitive crosses the sandbox boundary. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up deployment infrastructure for any project - establishes multi-gate deploy pipeline with test gates, build verification, frontend safety checks, and rollback strategy before code reaches production
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before any deployment or completion claim. Enforces test gates, evidence-based verification, and frontend safety checks. No deploy without passing. No claims without evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Odoo-specific grilling session that stress-tests addon plans, migrations, model/view/security designs, OWL frontend changes, and verification strategy. Use when the user wants to be grilled on an Odoo plan/design, asks to stress-test an addon architecture, or mentions grill me in an Odoo context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uses htmltest to crawl generated documentation or static site output, detect broken internal and external links, and return a link-focused validation report before deploy. This is a narrow docs QA skill for agents validating already-built HTML, not a generic site generator or crawler listing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score deep research agents on benchmark tasks using factual verification, report-quality scoring, and process evaluation before model or workflow changes ship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。