「rev」の検索結果

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex workflow tips from Boris Cherny (creator of Codex) and the Codex team. Use when: setting up Codex, optimizing workflows, running parallel sessions, configuring AGENTS.md, using skills/commands, subagents, hooks, MCP integrations, or learning best practices. Covers: git worktrees, plan mode, verification, permissions, Slack MCP, BigQuery, prompting tips, plugins, custom agents, sandboxing, keybindings, status lines, output styles, customization, /simplify for code quality, /batch for parallel code migrations, /loop for scheduled tasks, code review agents, /btw for mid-task questions, /effort max reasoning, remote control sessions, voice mode, setup scripts, session naming, /color, PostCompact hook, auto mode, /schedule cloud jobs, iMessage plugin, auto-memory, and auto-dream, mobile app, session teleporting, Cowork Dispatch, Chrome extension, Desktop app, /branch forking, --bare SDK startup, --add-dir multi-repo, --agent custom agents, /voice input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage stacked branches and pull requests with the gh-stack GitHub CLI extension. Use when the user wants to create, push, rebase, sync, navigate, or view stacks of dependent PRs. Triggers on tasks involving stacked diffs, dependent pull requests, branch chains, or incremental code review workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an idea into a Conventional Docs Decision, then a Plan: classify the request, explore options and risks through dialogue, then commit a numbered Decision that review, prototypes, and acceptance move through. Use PROACTIVELY before any creative work — new features, new subsystems, interface or dependency changes, or any open-ended design question ("what are the options", "how should I approach", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "write a decision", "ADR").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Code workflow tips from Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) and the Claude Code team. Use when: setting up Claude Code, optimizing workflows, running parallel sessions, configuring CLAUDE.md, using skills/commands, subagents, hooks, MCP integrations, or learning best practices. Covers: git worktrees, plan mode, verification, permissions, Slack MCP, BigQuery, prompting tips, plugins, custom agents, sandboxing, keybindings, status lines, output styles, customization, /simplify for code quality, /batch for parallel code migrations, /loop for scheduled tasks, code review agents, /btw for mid-task questions, /effort max reasoning, remote control sessions, voice mode, setup scripts, session naming, /color, PostCompact hook, auto mode, /schedule cloud jobs, iMessage plugin, auto-memory, and auto-dream, mobile app, session teleporting, Cowork Dispatch, Chrome extension, Desktop app, /branch forking, --bare SDK startup, --add-dir multi-repo, --agent custom agents, /voice input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pushes interfaces past conventional limits with technically ambitious implementations — shaders, spring physics, scroll-driven reveals, 60fps animations. Use when the user wants to wow, impress, go all-out, or make something that feels extraordinary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-epic review to extract lessons and assess success. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the speckit implementation phase chunk-by-chunk in clean-context subagents, then review, then produce a final report. Picks up from an existing tasks.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test coverage quality analysis — behavioral coverage, critical gap identification, test resilience evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Type design analysis — encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a dual-lens critical review of the specification and plan from both product strategy and engineering risk perspectives before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the full speckit workflow end-to-end — specify, plan, critique, tasks, implement, review — making all decisions autonomously. Stops before extract; run that manually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test coverage quality analysis — behavioral coverage, critical gap identification, test resilience evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Type design analysis — encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation quality gate that reviews changes, fixes small issues (scout rule), creates tasks for medium issues, and generates analysis for large issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。