1,631 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Automates browser tasks with Browser Use, the open-source library that connects LLM reasoning to Playwright-driven web actions. Useful for navigating sites, filling forms, extracting structured page data, and running agentic browser workflows with screenshots and stateful sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever writing a PR title/description, a commit message body, a code review comment, or an issue — in Hedgehog's own repo or any consuming project. Triggers on "open a PR", "write the PR description", "comment on this PR", "file an issue". Covers writing style (terse, info-dense, Simplified Technical English), the Why/What shape, folding deep reasoning under `<details>`, and the pre-open checklist (CI status, scope, verified claims only).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working on or testing imp-server and its HTTP APIs - OpenAI/Anthropic endpoints, /v1/chat/completions, /v1/messages, /v1/responses, SSE streaming, tool calling, json_schema/regex/GBNF constrained decoding, thinking/reasoning_content, cache_control/prefix cache, model loading and swapping, request priority, X-Request-Id, OTLP tracing / traceparent / Jaeger, /metrics, container env (IMP_SET), "server returns 404/garbage", API compliance. Do NOT use for CLI-only inference (imp-cli), kernel work (sm120-cuda-expert), or pure output-quality checks (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use TUnit. Use when a repo uses `TUnit`, `TUnit.Playwright`, `[Test]`, `[Arguments]`, `ClassDataSource`, `SharedType.PerTestSession`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates fraudulent conveyance risk for leveraged transactions with solvency analysis and reasonably equivalent value assessment. Use when analyzing fraudulent transfer risk, conducting solvency tests, or evaluating historical transactions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates commodity swaps, options, and exotic structures with seasonality, convenience yield, and storage cost analysis. Use when pricing commodity derivatives, analyzing energy structures, or evaluating commodity hedging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for any cap-table number, mechanic, or date before a founder signs, from a single SAFE, note or warrant described in chat or a quick 'is this dilution reasonable?' check to any draft or signed SAFE, note, term sheet, option plan, AoA, Carta XLSX, or spreadsheet. A single question gets a short cited answer in about 2–3 minutes; the full report, about 5–10 minutes, runs only when the founder shares documents or asks for it. Source-cited deterministic math (YC, NVCA, Cooley GO) for SAFE/note conversion, priced-round dilution, anti-dilution, option pools, warrants, MFN chains, dual-class voting, QSBS and Israeli §102 dates, and Israeli ↔ Delaware flips. NOT for waterfall modeling, cumulative dividends, RSUs, 83(b), 409A, SPAC, warrant repricing, or pure term definitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent LLM judge evaluates task completion separately from the executing agent, catching false success claims by reviewing task goal, actions taken, final state, and evidence. Produces PASS/FAIL with confidence score and reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compress large context before reasoning to reduce token usage while preserving evidence. Use this whenever the user mentions huge files, long prompts, RAG payloads, prompt caching, expensive sessions, codebase context, chat history compaction, or wants the same answer quality with fewer tokens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户询问如何根据季节调整作息饮食运动时激活;当需要做年度健康计划或生活节奏调整时; 当感到身体状态与季节不匹配时(如冬天精力过旺无法安眠、春天却萎靡不振)。 典型触发信号: 用户提到"最近换季身体不太对""想调整作息适应季节""一年四季怎么安排生活"。 不适用于: 与季节无关的即时性问题(如突发外伤、急性感染),或已有明确西医诊断只需遵医嘱的场景。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trains the HUMAN user's critical thinking through four modes: drill (argument-analysis items with a single defensible answer, judge stance), scene (Socratic exploration of synthetic scenes or user-supplied material, no verdicts on interpretations; includes a configure track — design the information request and verification plan for a decision before any analysis), expedition (guided audit of impossible-tier problems from verified packs), and detective (a runtime-generated multi-layer case worked as an escape room, guide-and-judge stance). Use when the user wants to practice critical thinking, analyze arguments, hunt assumptions, examine bias, train reasoning, or decide what information a decision needs first. Triggers: critical thinking practice, train my thinking, drill, scene, byom, configure, information plan, what would I need to know, spot manipulation tactics, scam literacy, 批判思考練習, 話術辨識, detective, 查案, 破案, 偵探.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used to spawn specialized OpenAI Codex CLI subagents for code review, debugging, architecture analysis, security audits, refactoring, documentation, comparative evidence adjudication, and autonomous /goal runs. It adds each persona through process-local developer instructions while preserving the project's AGENTS.md chain, including during parallel launches. Supports GPT-6-Astra across low, medium, high, xhigh, max, and ultra reasoning with default or priority service tiers, plus GPT-5.6 and GPT-5.5 models. Triggers on 'delegate to Codex', 'Codex Astra', 'Astra subagent', 'Codex subagent', 'code review agent', 'security audit', 'refactor with Codex', 'goal run', 'autonomous goal', 'have Codex weigh this'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Desktop GUI automation via OpenInterpreter — mouse, keyboard, screenshot, and OCR control for native macOS/Linux applications. Three modes: Library (Claude reasons, OI executes), OS subprocess (full autonomous computer use), and Local agent (Ollama, offline). This skill should be used when interacting with desktop apps that have no CLI or API, automating GUI workflows, reading screen content via OCR, or controlling mouse/keyboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold editorial documentation sites with the Vellum design system — OKLCH palette, Bodoni Moda / Source Serif 4 / Inconsolata typography, warm or dark space theme, 35 semantic components (state cards, parity matrices, entity dossiers, stat stacks, utterance blocks, editorial notes, entity flows, fact blocks, sub-navigation, source lists, debugger panels, ring visualizations, phase timelines, glossaries, subject-intro, stat-bar, hero-image with lightbox, gallery/masonry grid, audio player with Web Audio API). Static HTML, zero build step. Use when building competitive intelligence pages, personal archives, internal documentation, roadmaps, or multi-page static sites that need a designed, non-generic aesthetic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Package codebases into LLM-optimized markdown, and run the Deep Think Authority pipeline (context-builder → Deep Think review → structured AUTHORITY → Flash/Antigravity implementation agent). Use when generating project context, preparing Deep Think reviews, or binding a weaker coding agent to a senior reasoning pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ask Kimi a read-only free-form question about the current repository. Use for prose explanations, flow tracing, module comparisons, or conceptual reasoning where Codex should delegate the answer to local kimi-code rather than perform implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized agentic and context engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when designing AI agents — system prompts, tool definitions, context window architectures, failure mode planning, multi-agent coordination, agent evaluation. Trigger on: "design an agent," "build a system prompt for an agent," "architect an agent's context," "design tool definitions," "agent system prompt," "context window architecture," "tool interface design," "evaluate agent behavior," "multi-agent coordination," "context engineering for agents," "ACI design." Provides 12 tested approaches for agent architecture (designing agents, not using them). Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring individual non-agent prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Do NOT use for general software architecture that hosts agents (use standard technical reasoning for that).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。