7,515 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when creating or updating the project skill discovery config — generates or regenerates .dh/skill_discovery.yaml by scanning the repo to infer tech stack, inventorying installed skills via npx skills list, loading candidate skill content before suggesting, and writing a config-driven skill injection file. Triggers on /dh:setup-skill-discovery invocations and programmatic --auto calls from add-new-feature Phase 3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a set of candidate Skills or app capabilities is technically valid but still needs to become a clear, useful ChatGPT/Codex Plugin that people can understand, discover, and invoke for real work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCRs scanned or image-only corpora with vision-language models in three phases. Evaluate selects a system by measured CER or WER against stratified human ground truth. Run builds the production pipeline. Clean corrects raw OCR with LLM and rule-based passes, quality diagnostics, and span-level provenance. Use when choosing an OCR model for a corpus, measuring OCR accuracy, transcribing scans at scale, or correcting raw OCR. Born-digital documents with text layers go to doc-to-markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan your Claude Code configuration (.claude/ directory) for security vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and injection risks using AgentShield. Checks CLAUDE.md, settings.json, MCP servers, hooks, and agent definitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical analysis frameworks — candlestick patterns, Ichimoku cloud, technical indicators (RSI/MACD/EMA/Bollinger), harmonic patterns (Gartley/Bat/Butterfly/Crab), Elliott Wave, Chan Theory (缠论 bi/zhongshu/buy-sell points), Smart Money Concepts (BOS/FVG/Order Block), and Turtle Trading signals with ATR/Unit position sizing. Triggers: "技术分析", "K线形态", "蜡烛图", "一目均衡表", "RSI", "MACD", "布林带", "谐波形态", "艾略特波浪", "缠论", "分型", "笔", "中枢", "Smart Money", "BOS", "FVG", "海龟交易", "海龟信号", "K線形態", "蠟燭圖", "一目均衡表", "纏論", "ichimoku", "candlestick pattern", "K线形态识别", "形态识别", "识别K线", "识别形态", "harmonic", "Elliott Wave", "chan theory", "turtle trading", "SMC", "technical indicators", "技術分析", "海龜交易", "海龜信號", "諧波形態"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test an uncertain Anabasis v2 path at the smallest real layer that can decide it, before a paid round is asked to: one fact from a log or a dry run, a walk of one value across the layers a change touches, a replay of every recorded log through this tree's readers, a whole round rehearsed on a seeded copy of a campaign with a script in each model seat (`bun run runs seed`, `bun run runs rehearse`), or one live seat from a seed. Use when the operator asks whether a change will work in the real system, to simulate or rehearse a round, to stand again in a position a past run stood in, what a campaign of a given size can read, or what a kill or a stop leaves behind. Not for reading a finished run (whole-run-investigation) or starting a paid one (run-management).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate an alert, page, or production symptom in an incident channel or a team's oncall / monitoring channel, and report findings a human can verify. Ordinary conversation and chatter are not alerts; leave those alone. Use when an alert or page lands, when error rate, latency or saturation is up, when someone asks "why is X broken", "investigate", "what changed", "root cause this", pastes a monitor, dashboard, trace or error-tracker link, or reports production trouble; also by default when an alert lands in a covered channel unasked. Feed-level asks land here too ("which alerts matter", "triage today's alerts"), plus the scheduled alert-review routine and the ticket path ("customer X can't check out"). Runs a fast first pass posted as a short interim update with a TL;DR, every finding carrying the query or link to verify it, then proposes the fix and — with connector access and confirmation — carries it out, never unattended. Afterwards `incident-postmortem` writes it up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run and write tests for the Incan compiler. Use when the user asks to test changes, add tests, run the test suite, verify a feature, or says /test. Guides test selection, provides correct patterns, and runs the right commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish local Incan or Encero repository changes to GitHub using project standards. Use when the user asks to yeet, publish, commit and PR, push a branch and open a review-ready or draft PR from local changes while requiring the repo-local commit-message and PR-description conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an Incan RFC document for formatting, structural, and content issues before GitHub submission. Use when the user asks to review an RFC, check an RFC for problems, prepare an RFC for submission, or says /review-rfc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Report which local git worktrees under tmp/ are safe to close, need a human look, or are explicitly protected. Use when the user says /fleet-audit, asks what worktrees can be cleaned up, or wants a status check across all Ralph-loop/spike worktrees before running closeout on any of them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompose a task into safe parallel sub-agent slices with explicit ownership, optional worktree isolation, per-worker plans, verification, and orchestrator-led integration. Use when the user explicitly asks for delegation, sub-agents, or parallel work and the task can be split into non-overlapping scopes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Incan review/fix loop end to end: review, fix actionable findings, and review again until clean or blocked. Use when the user wants an autonomous review-and-repair pass or says /review-and-fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transition an Incan RFC from one status to the next. Use when the user asks to promote, advance, or finalize an RFC, or says /bump-rfc. Handles Draft → Planned, Planned → In Progress, and In Progress → Implemented transitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely close out completed Incan work after a PR is merged by verifying merge status, syncing the base branch, removing task-owned local worktrees/assets, deleting merged local/remote branches, pruning refs, and reporting dirty or ambiguous leftovers. Use when the user says /closeout, asks to clean up after a merged PR, or wants local RFC/issue branch/worktree cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts implementation plans with TDD, documentation updates, and repository verification commands before coding. Use when the user asks for an implementation plan, /create-plan, or structured pre-implementation design for work in encero workspaces (e.g. Incan, IncQL).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix actionable in-scope findings in the current Incan worktree, usually after /review. Use when the user asks to fix review findings, clean up reported issues, apply in-scope review feedback, or says /fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write unit and E2E tests for Grafana visualization panels and viz utilities to the conventions this repo expects. Use when adding, backfilling, or reviewing tests for panels (barchart, timeseries, table, xychart, heatmap, canvas, etc.), grafana-ui viz components (Table, uPlot, VizLegend, VizTooltip), or grafana-data viz utils; when a panel test only asserts "it rendered" or "it's defined"; when reviewing AI-generated panel tests for slop; or when a canvas/rendering test is flaky.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the user wants to find, rank, or shortlist directories, listing sites, or launch platforms where they can submit a software product, SaaS, app, tool, or startup — to get backlinks, referral traffic, and launch-day reach. Triggers on "where can I submit my SaaS for launch", "list of Product Hunt alternatives", "directories to get backlinks for our app", "high-authority software listing sites", "where should I list my startup", or "pull submission details for these 8 directory domains", even when described indirectly (we're launching next week, where do we post; how do we get backlinks by listing in directories). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a catalog of 1,000+ product directories enriched with Domain Rating, backlinks, and organic traffic. Defer to find-mcp-directories for MCP-server listings and find-ai-directories for AI-tool / AI-agent / agent-skill listings. Skip finding a firm/agency to hire (use the find-* agency skills), finding products *inside* a directory ("recommend the best CRM"), building a directory site (do-the-work), local/business directories for brick-and-mortar listings, and link-building *services*.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the user wants to find, rank, or shortlist directories and listing sites where they can submit an AI product — an AI tool, AI app, AI agent, or agent skill / plugin — to get backlinks, referral traffic, and discovery. Triggers on "where can I list my AI tool", "directories to submit my AI agent", "agent-skills directories", "best AI tool directories for backlinks", "where do I get my GPT/Claude app discovered", or "pull submission details for these AI-directory domains", even when described indirectly (we built an AI agent, where do we get it in front of people). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a catalog of 1,000+ product directories enriched with Domain Rating, backlinks, and organic traffic. Defer to find-mcp-directories for MCP-server listings specifically, and to find-product-directories for general SaaS/software/app launches with no AI angle. Skip finding an AI consultancy/agency to hire (use find-ai-consultancy), comparing AI products ("ChatGPT vs Claude"), building an AI tool (do-the-work), and AI link-building *services*.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when searching for buying signals, detecting intent data, scoring prospect readiness, or monitoring accounts for trigger events. Triggers: 'scan for signals', 'find buying signals', 'who is ready to buy', 'intent signals', 'signal scoring', 'account signals'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。