1,304 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
look up and explain llm api pricing across models.dev, openrouter, and official provider pages. use when the user asks for model prices, input/output token costs, cached-token costs, openrouter aliases such as :free, provider-specific pricing, official versus third-party prices, or wants to verify an api call cost log.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai, plus two real screenshots of one interface in two states. Animates the transition between them as one video — both go into a single Ofox video job, and the model cross-fades the values that changed while the rest of the layout holds. Use when a user wants a short software demo animation out of captures they already have, e.g. "turn these two screenshots into a demo clip", "show the dashboard going from the free plan to the paid one", "animate this settings change for the docs", or "make a clip of the counter going from 3 to 25". Do not use for a pair that is not a user interface (see keyframe-animation), for a screen recording (record it instead), or when only one screenshot exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-phase Apollo.io prospecting: free People Search to discover ICP-matching leads, then selective enrichment to reveal emails/phones (credits per contact). Deduplicates against CRM (Google Sheets). Supports Apollo API and MCP tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and audits data retention and file compaction for an embedded SQLite datastore in a long-lived service — a unified retention registry (one declared policy per table), TTL / absolute-age / row-count-cap policies, a fail-loud coverage guard, WAL/checkpoint tuning, and auto_vacuum/incremental-vacuum so pruning actually shrinks the file. Use when a SQLite DB grows unbounded, a table has an index but no DELETE, a pruned DB never shrinks on disk, metrics are stored as raw events forever, or a new table needs bounding. Keywords retention policy, TTL, reaper, prune, VACUUM, auto_vacuum, incremental_vacuum, WAL checkpoint, freelist, DB bloat, row cap, per-tenant quota. NOT for Postgres/MySQL/server-DB partitioning or TTL, log-line rate-limiting/sampling, backup/replication, schema migrations, or query-performance indexing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for bounded reasoning, partial planning, commitment policy, deliberation cost, and reconsideration-threshold design instead of assuming free deliberation. NOT for exhaustive planning, static optimization, or domains where reconsideration cost is irrelevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design scheduling agents. Use for timezone-safe negotiation, focus protection, and privacy-safe free-busy handling. NOT for calendar UI, project planning, or general agent architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Compares the version-pinned A2A, MCP, and JSON-RPC role boundaries covered by this bundle; OpenAI and LangChain-specific APIs require their own current sources. Teaches when to use rigid schemas versus free-form content with validation, typed versus untyped boundaries, and streaming versus batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。