2,299 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Extract text from complex documents using Chandra OCR — handles tables, forms, handwriting, and full page layouts with high accuracy. Use when: extracting data from scanned documents, reading complex tables from PDFs/images, processing handwritten forms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement high-quality blog post and article page layouts with professional typography, spacing, and visual hierarchy. Use when building blog pages, article templates, technical documentation readers, use-case pages, or long-form content layouts. Covers dark and light themes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apache Cassandra is a distributed NoSQL database designed for high availability and linear scalability. Learn CQL (Cassandra Query Language), data modeling with partition keys, replication strategies, and integration with Node.js using the DataStax driver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch and manage Amazon EC2 instances for scalable compute. Configure AMIs, security groups, key pairs, and EBS volumes. Set up auto-scaling groups for high availability and cost optimization across availability zones.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Actix Web is a powerful, high-performance web framework for Rust. It provides async handlers, type-safe extractors, middleware, and integrates with the Rust ecosystem for building fast, reliable, and memory-safe web services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for Apache Arrow, the cross-language columnar memory format for analytics workloads. Helps developers use Arrow for high-performance data interchange between systems, zero-copy reads, and efficient columnar processing in Python (PyArrow) and JavaScript (Arrow JS).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Covers design thinking, typography pairing, color theory, motion design, spatial composition, and code quality. Generates real working code — HTML/CSS/JS or React — with intentional aesthetic direction, not generic AI output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GraphQL gives clients exactly the data they need - no more, no less. One endpoint, typed schema, introspection. But the flexibility that makes it powerful also makes it dangerous. Without proper controls, clients can craft queries that bring down your server. This skill covers schema design, resolvers, DataLoader for N+1 prevention, federation for microservices, and client integration with Apollo/urql. Key insight: GraphQL is a contract. The schema is the API documentation. Design it carefully. 2025 lesson: GraphQL isn't always the answer. For simple CRUD, REST is simpler. For high-performance public APIs, REST with caching wins. Use GraphQL when you have complex data relationships and diverse client needs. Use when "graphql, graphql schema, graphql resolver, apollo server, apollo client, graphql federation, dataloader, graphql codegen, graphql query, graphql mutation, graphql, api, apollo, schema, resolvers, dataloader, federation, typescript" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for laboratory automation including liquid handling robotics, LIMS integration, protocol development, quality control, and high-throughput workflows. Covers both open-source (Opentrons) and commercial platforms. Use when ", " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for FPGA development including RTL design (Verilog/VHDL), timing closure, clock domain crossing, high-level synthesis, and verification. Covers both traditional HDL and modern HLS approaches. Use when ", " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Email has the highest ROI of any marketing channel. $36 for every $1 spent. Yet most startups treat it as an afterthought - bulk blasts, no personalization, landing in spam folders. This skill covers transactional email that works, marketing automation that converts, deliverability that reaches inboxes, and the infrastructure decisions that scale. Use when "keywords, file_patterns, code_patterns, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class explainer video expertise combining the visual storytelling of Kurzgesagt, the simplification genius of Common Craft, and the conversion science of high-performing SaaS landing pages. Explainer videos transform complex ideas into clear, compelling stories. Great explainers don't just inform—they illuminate. They take abstract concepts and make them feel obvious. The best explainer videos understand that simplicity is the ultimate sophistication, that showing beats telling, and that the goal isn't to impress with complexity—it's to make the viewer feel smart. Use when "explainer, explainer video, how it works, product demo, onboarding video, training video, educational video, whiteboard, animated explainer, explain this, simplify, concept video, SaaS video, explainer, video, animation, educational, product, demo, onboarding, SaaS" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class accessibility design expertise combining the inclusive design principles of Microsoft's Inclusive Design team, the technical rigor of the W3C WCAG working group, and the lived experience perspective of disability advocates. Accessibility is not a feature - it's a fundamental quality attribute that makes products usable by everyone. Great accessibility design is invisible to those who don't need it and essential to those who do. It benefits everyone: captions help in noisy environments, keyboard navigation helps power users, high contrast helps in bright sunlight. When you design for the extremes, you improve the experience for all. Accessibility is not a checklist - it's a mindset that asks "who are we excluding?" at every design decision. Use when "accessibility, a11y, wcag, screen reader, keyboard navigation, color contrast, alt text, aria, focus management, skip link, assistive technology, inclusive design, ada compliance, section 508, accessible, voiceover, nvda, jaws, tab order, focus trap, accessibility, a11y, wcag, inclusive-design, screen-reader, keyboard-navigation, color-contrast, aria, focus-management, assistive-technology" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility isn't a feature - it's a fundamental quality of good software. 1 in 4 adults has a disability. Many more have temporary impairments or situational limitations. Your users include people who can't see, can't hear, can't use a mouse, or can't process information the way you do. This skill covers WCAG guidelines, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and automated testing. Key insight: accessible code is better code. The constraints of accessibility lead to simpler, more semantic, more maintainable implementations. 2025 lesson: Accessibility lawsuits are at an all-time high. "We'll add it later" is both ethically wrong and legally risky. Start accessible, stay accessible. Use when "accessibility, a11y, wcag, aria, screen reader, keyboard navigation, focus trap, alt text, color contrast, skip link, accessible, accessibility, a11y, wcag, aria, screen-reader, keyboard, inclusive, semantic-html" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content topical authority and gap analysis powered by the DataForSEO Labs API. Clusters a domain's ranked keywords into topics, identifies strong vs weak vs missing topic clusters versus competitors, and returns a Content Score (0-100) plus the highest-leverage content opportunities to write next.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find keywords competitors rank for that you don't, via the DataForSEO Labs domain_intersection endpoint. Surfaces the highest-leverage content opportunities sorted by search volume and the competitor's ranking position, with cross-competitor consensus signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find local-business SEO prospects in a single command. Searches Google for "<niche> <city>", filters out aggregators (Yelp, Yellow Pages, Angi), enriches each remaining domain with DataForSEO Labs domain overview, On-Page technical audit, and Backlinks summary in parallel, then ranks the businesses by a closeability score (0-100) — highest scores are the easiest to land as SEO clients.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transparent, itemized impressions of AI-generated WRITING STYLE — the repo's ONLY non-integrity track. Two passes: a deterministic defensive-hedge density screen (tools/check_ai_style.py, AIS-DEFENSIVE-HEDGE) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass over the 13 AIS-* style tells (broken narrative arc, LLM phrase tics, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames, clause/formula walls, gratuitous pseudocode, bullet overuse, bold-module spam, restatement loops, focus drift, single-style figures, appendix dumping). Every finding is named, LOCATED, span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), carries not_integrity_finding:true + false_positive_risk:high + an fp_case, and gets ZERO verdict weight: the adjudicator forces it to info, excludes it from overall_verdict, and renders it in a SEPARATE report section. NOT an AI-text classifier — no scores, no "this is AI-written", no authorship probability; a paper can be CLEAN_GIVEN_EVIDENCE and still list many. Emits ai-style-impressions.findings.json; computes NO verdict; if a tell is actually substantive it routes to the integrity auditor. Triggers: "AI style", "vibe check", "writing fingerprint", "AI 文风", "vibe paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Async Python Patterns workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Comprehensive guidance for implementing asynchronous Python applications using asyncio, concurrent programming patterns, and async/await for building high-performance, non-blocking systems and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Async Python Patterns workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Comprehensive guidance for implementing asynchronous Python applications using asyncio, concurrent programming patterns, and async/await for building high-performance, non-blocking systems and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Async Python Patterns workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Comprehensive guidance for implementing asynchronous Python applications using asyncio, concurrent programming patterns, and async/await for building high-performance, non-blocking systems and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。