「ship」の検索結果

Use when a generated Scenario image needs a quality check or a brand-brief compliance verdict before it ships: pass/warn/fail scoring, on-brand review against a configured brief, QA gating a batch, pricing or refreshing a stored verdict, or iterating a generation until it clears the gate. Keywords: quality gate, quality check, QA, verdict, brief compliance, on-brand, brand brief, pass fail, score, review, asset_quality_gate_run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when one approved visual, image or video, must ship at many sizes or placements through Scenario: adapting a master to 1:1, 4:5, 9:16, or 16:9, social formats for feeds and stories, YouTube thumbnails, storefront capsules and app store graphics, marketplace product images, link previews, display banners, a website hero, or choosing between crop, resize, expand, and generative reframe. Keywords: aspect ratio, resize, reframe, outpaint, expand, derivative, safe zone, thumbnail, banner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn books, PDFs, slides, documents, web pages and text into a source-grounded knowledge base, interactive learning HTML and Markdown in English or Chinese. Use for learning, summaries, explanations, review, quizzes, relationship maps, saving reusable methodology files, retrieving or comparing accumulated methods, and applying them to a real problem. 将材料转为可追溯知识库与交互学习页，支持中英文、关系图、方法论保存/检索/比较及应用；区分材料依据、推断与外部核验。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a guided, end-to-end security review of a Power Pages site and consolidates every finding into one HTML report covering source code and dependencies, the live site, browser headers, firewall, authentication, and role-based permissions. Use when the user wants a full security review, a release-readiness check before publishing, a code-and-config check during development, live site monitoring, or asks open-ended questions like "review my site security", "is my site safe to ship", "do a security check", "monitor my site" — even if they do not name the individual checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates Dataverse tables, columns, and relationships for a Power Pages site based on a data model proposal. Use when the user wants to set up the data model, create database tables, or build the Dataverse schema for their site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate, reconcile to the chosen target(s), and stage the `manifest.json` for a `.ppmplugin` bundle. In the normal flow the committed `./manifest.json` already exists (authored by /generate-native-extension), so this stage reads it, runs the plugin's upload-compatibility checks locally as a pre-flight gate (name regex, canonical prefix, known incompatible names, method and identifier shapes), reconciles `entrypoints` down to the platform(s) you ship, and writes the gitignored staged copy `ppmplugin/staging/manifest.json` that /assemble-ppmplugin zips. If no committed manifest exists (a hand-authored module) it falls back to deriving every field from the class name and Android module source, writing both the committed file and the staged copy. No toolchain — pure read, validate, write. Target-aware. Run after the native module exists, before the build skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to enable offline mode for a Power Apps mobile app and create a Mobile Offline Profile in Dataverse — designs per-table row scope, relationships, columns, and sync frequency through a 3-gate approval flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and edits a model-driven Power Apps app from a natural-language intent — tables, columns, relationships, adaptive forms with sub-grids, views, Choice-column charts, business rules, business process flows, generative page intents for overview/dashboard surfaces (page `.tsx` generated in generate-pages after plan approval), and an app module + sitemap — via the headless cds-maker-sdk. Runs an interactive, multi-turn authoring flow (env selection, jobs-to-be-done first, then design-only App Spec authoring across confirmed levels, guardrail lint, plan-mode approval, generate-pages, full build) and a narrated build, and can download a deployed app back into an editable spec to change it. Use when the user says "build an app for X", "create a model-driven app", "make me an app to manage Y", "add a business process flow", or "edit/add to my app". This skill stands alone and does not require /genpage — but for a standalone generative page added to an app that already exists, use /genpage instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when developing or modifying styles for TDesign React components. It provides guidance on BEM naming conventions, CSS Variables usage, state classes, and the relationship between component code and common submodule styles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate e-commerce product advertisement video prompts for Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield. Use whenever the user wants product ads, e-commerce videos, product showcases, unboxing, product demos, shopping ads, fashion ads, beauty ads, food ads, or any commercial product video for online selling. Triggers on: product ad, e-commerce, product showcase, Amazon video, Shopify ad, Instagram shop, TikTok shop, product commercial, fashion video, beauty ad, food ad, product demo, dropshipping video, or any product promotional video request. Use even for "make a video for my product" or "product promo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a multi-quarter roadmap from a backlog of ideas, requests, and ongoing initiatives. Use this skill when planning the next quarter, sequencing dependent work, balancing build vs improve vs maintain, or making the case for what NOT to do. Triggers on roadmap, quarterly planning, what should we build next, sequencing, prioritization, OKR planning, capacity planning, what's on the roadmap, plan the year, what to ship next quarter. Also triggers when stakeholders are pulling in different directions and the team needs a defensible plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and run usability tests on existing or prototype designs including test design, task scripts, moderation, observation, and findings synthesis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to test usability, run a moderated test, run an unmoderated test, validate a design, find usability issues, or improve task completion. Triggers on usability test, usability testing, moderated test, unmoderated test, task script, think aloud, prototype testing, user testing, design validation, task completion. Also triggers when the user has built something and wants to know if real users can use it before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for individual long-form content pieces. Case studies, whitepapers, research reports, definitive guides, manifestos, ebooks, long-form tutorials. The structural disciplines that distinguish publication-quality long-form from bloggy-long padding or academic bloat. Different from pillar-content-architecture (which covers hub structure); this skill covers individual deep-dive pieces. Triggers on long-form content, case study writing, whitepaper, research report, definitive guide, ebook, manifesto, long-form tutorial, deep-dive article, anchor piece, foundational article, structural archetypes. Also triggers when a piece is over 3,000 words and the team is unsure how to structure it, when a long-form draft feels padded or saggy, or when a flagship asset needs the depth to actually earn the length.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OKR design as actually shipped, not as conference-talk theory. Outcome statements that drive decisions, key results that measure the right thing, scoring discipline, mid-quarter recalibration, and the difference between sandbagged OKRs (always 100%) and aspirational OKRs (always 30%) and stretch OKRs (genuine ambition with quarterly accountability). Triggers on OKR design, OKR setting, key result design, OKR scoring, mid-quarter recalibration, OKR cascading, outcomes vs outputs, quarterly planning, goal setting. Also triggers when a team's OKRs are always hit and producing no learning, when OKRs are demoralizing because they were set as fantasy, or when the team uses OKR vocabulary but the practice has decayed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk the user through four directional axes (tone register, aesthetic philosophy, audience relationship, sensory ambition) and produce a structured aesthetic brief that downstream content, copy, design, and art-direction skills consume as required input. The aesthetic depth layer, distinct from `creative-brief` (operational kickoff: scope, audience, deliverables, constraints). Use when a project needs aesthetic coherence across many small decisions and the user has only a vague feeling, or when multiple downstream aesthetic-producing skills need a shared brief. Triggers on creative direction, aesthetic direction, set the aesthetic, define the visual direction, what's the vibe, what's the tone, the four axes. Does NOT fire for a general kickoff brief (use `creative-brief`), tactical single-piece work, already-documented direction, purely functional output, or locked production-stage work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured after-action review (postmortem, retrospective) on a launch, incident, or completed project to capture timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, and actionable lessons. Use this skill whenever the user wants to run a postmortem, retrospective, AAR, or after-action review on any past event. Triggers on after-action report, AAR, postmortem, retrospective, retro, post-incident review, what went well what didn't, lessons learned, blameless postmortem, root cause analysis, RCA, five whys. Also triggers when the user has just shipped something or just resolved an incident and wants to capture learnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How humans and AI compose in content workflows. Where AI legitimately participates, where humans must own, hybrid workflow patterns, voice ownership preservation, the AI slop problem, disclosure and transparency, team calibration, and the ethics of intellectually honest AI-assisted content production. Triggers on AI content workflow, AI-assisted writing, hybrid content production, AI in editorial, AI slop, AI disclosure, AI usage policy, AI content ethics, voice preservation with AI, team AI calibration. Also triggers when content feels generic despite quality tools, when team AI usage has drifted into inconsistency, or when a regulated or trust-sensitive context requires explicit AI policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A discipline for designing experiments (A/B tests, multivariate, holdouts) so the results actually answer the question you asked. Hypothesis writing, sample size, duration, segment analysis, running discipline, matching a result to a pre-committed decision rule, and the common failure modes that produce confidently wrong shipping decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is planning a test that has not run yet: framing a hypothesis, sizing the sample, setting duration, choosing guardrails, or deciding whether something is worth testing at all. Triggers on design an experiment, experiment plan, A/B test, split test, multivariate test, holdout, experiment hypothesis, sample size, minimum detectable effect, MDE, test duration, guardrail metric, no peeking, pre-committed decision rule, is this worth testing. Use `experimentation-analytics` instead when the test has already run and the question is how to read the result panel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-publish QA framework for content. Brief adherence, voice consistency, fact accuracy, structure and clarity, AI-content audit, SEO and AEO compliance, internal linking and schema validation, QA at scale via sampling, the QA workflow, and the discipline that distinguishes catch-problems QA from checkbox QA. Triggers on editorial QA, content review, pre-publish review, content audit, content QA process, AI-content audit, hallucination check, content sampling, programmatic QA, voice consistency check, brief adherence check. Also triggers when a content team is shipping sloppy work, when AI-co-authored content is reaching publish unaudited, when a QA process burns reviewers out, or when a programmatic SEO set needs sampling discipline. On a voice consistency check, this skill owns checking a draft against an existing voice system at the publish gate; use `brand-voice` when the voice system itself needs defining or documenting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transfer operation of a customer deployment with ownership, evidence and a tested support path. Use for handoff or an engineer rotation, not merely code delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a board or executive summary of an engagement using outcomes, risks and investment decisions. Use when the sponsor needs to brief senior leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sequence an understood outcome into verifiable delivery slices with dependencies, ownership and acceptance checks. Use for delivery planning, estimation or migration strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess a new customer request against agreed scope, trade-offs and ownership. Use when an engagement expands or a custom feature needs a commitment decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map stakeholders, decision rights, influence and blockers from supplied evidence. Use when ownership is unclear or the stakeholder landscape changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。