「what」の検索結果

When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing strategies,' 'marketing tactics,' 'ways to promote,' 'ideas to grow,' 'what else can I try,' 'I don't know how to market this,' 'brainstorm marketing,' or 'what marketing should I do.' Use this as a starting point whenever someone is stuck or looking for inspiration on how to grow. For specific channel execution, see the relevant skill (paid-ads, social-content, email-sequence, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation. Also use when the user mentions "lead magnet," "gated content," "content upgrade," "downloadable," "ebook," "cheat sheet," "checklist," "template download," "opt-in," "freebie," "PDF download," "resource library," "content offer," "email capture content," "Notion template," "spreadsheet template," or "what should I give away for emails." Use this for planning what to create and how to distribute it. For interactive tools as lead magnets, see free-tool-strategy. For writing the actual content, see copywriting. For the email sequence after capture, see email-sequence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage project learnings. Review, search, prune, and export what gstack has learned across sessions. Use when asked to "what have we learned", "show learnings", "prune stale learnings", or "export learnings". Proactively suggest when the user asks about past patterns or wonders "didn't we fix this before?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a compact KPI digest showing how key metrics changed over a period and what's driving the movement. Use this skill when someone asks for a performance summary, a weekly recap, a morning briefing, a KPI update, or any variation of "how did we do this week/month." Also trigger for requests like "give me a performance overview," "what moved in the last 7 days," "pull our KPI report," or "summarize our metrics."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive dimension analysis and reporting for CJA. Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze one or more dimensions — including cardinality, distribution/skew, trends, anomalies, data quality errors, comparisons, and forecasting. Also trigger when someone asks "what are the top values for...", "dimension health", "explore this dimension", "dimension dashboard", "dimension statistics", "data quality check on a dimension", "dimension cardinality", "dimension trends", "dimension skew", "dimension anomalies", "compare dimensions", or any similar request to understand what's inside a CJA dimension. Produces an interactive HTML dashboard or a markdown report. Works with the CJA MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a compact KPI digest showing how key metrics changed over a period and what's driving the movement. Use this skill when someone asks for a performance summary, a weekly recap, a morning briefing, a KPI update, or any variation of "how did we do this week/month." Also trigger for "give me a performance overview," "what moved in the last 7 days," "pull our AA KPI report," or "summarize our metrics."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a concise, executive-ready performance summary covering key metrics, trends, and what's driving movement. Use this skill when someone needs to produce a briefing, executive summary, performance narrative, or stakeholder readout — for example, "write an exec summary of last week's performance," "create a performance briefing for our leadership team," "produce a monthly business review summary," "what should I tell executives about our metrics," or "generate a performance narrative." Also trigger for "QBR summary," "weekly business review," or "stakeholder briefing."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harvest every `ponytail:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals ponytail leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Use when the user says "ponytail debt", "/ponytail-debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", "ponytail ledger", or "what did we mark to do later". One-shot report, changes nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Boyd's OODA loop to navigate fast-moving, uncertain, or competitive situations — Observe what is actually happening, Orient through mental models and context, Decide on the clearest path, Act quickly, then loop again. Load when the situation is changing faster than the current plan, when a competitive response is needed, when the user is stuck in analysis paralysis in a dynamic environment, when shipping under uncertainty, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a fast-moving / competitive frame. Triggers on "what should we do right now", "the situation is changing", "how do we respond to this", "competitive response", "we need to move fast", or "we're stuck deciding". Based on John Boyd's OODA loop — Observe, Orient, Decide, Act — adapted for product and business contexts (OODA Canvas 2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose tasks into structured, outcome-defined process entries with complexity triage. Load when user says "decompose this", "break this down", "what steps do I need", "plan this out", "what's the process for", "how do I approach this", or when any complex task needs structured execution planning. Includes a problem-understanding pass before complexity triage. Routes to `problem-to-plan` when the user needs planning deliverables (spec + plan + TODO). Does NOT replace brainstorming — brainstorming is design approval (upstream), this is execution planning (downstream).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a skill domain before building or improving a skill. Searches academic papers, practitioner blogs, and GitHub skill repos in parallel to find current best practices, domain gotchas, and existing skill patterns. Called by universal-skill-creator and improve-skills before writing any skill. Also load directly when the user asks to research a domain for a skill, find existing skills on a topic, discover best practices for a skill, check what research exists before building an agent skill, or says "what does current research say about", "find best practices for".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load bounded working context at the start of a coding session. FIRES ON EVERY FIRST USER MESSAGE in a fresh session, regardless of content — including bare greetings ("hi", "hello", "hey"), task-only openers, or "let's start". Also triggers on: "fresh session", "session start", "first message in a new thread", "new chat", "cold start", "begin work in this repo", "starting work", "continue from prior session", "what were we working on", "resume", "what happened last time", "load memory", "recall context", "create a handoff", "prior session context", "latest handoff", "current state", "decision context". Skip ONLY if the user explicitly says "fresh start" or "ignore prior context". Self no-ops if invoked mid-session when context is already loaded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate 5–10 business idea candidates from a blank page or a founder's domain context — using pain mining, jobs-to-be-done, trend × capability mapping, constraint relaxation, adjacency search, and founder-market-fit prompts. Each candidate is a structured idea card (segment, JTBD, current alternative, why-now, distribution wedge, monetisation, "feels like"). Load when the user asks to generate business ideas, brainstorm startup ideas, find ideas to work on, says "what business should I start", "give me startup ideas", "I don't know what to build", "ideate ventures", "blank-page idea generation", "find me a startup idea", "explore business opportunities". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "Uber for X" / "AI for X" with no specific JTBD, "everyone" segments, and idea cards missing any of the 7 required fields. Does NOT design or evaluate ideas generated — for that use `idea-evaluation`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip a problem to its irreducible fundamental truths and rebuild the solution from the ground up — free from analogy, convention, and inherited assumptions. Load when the user feels constrained by how something has always been done, when existing solutions feel expensive or inefficient for no good reason, when the user asks to think from first principles, challenge the fundamentals, or rebuild this from scratch. Also triggers on "why does it have to work this way", "what are the actual constraints here", "ignore what everyone else does", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a convention-break frame. Based on Aristotle's first principles method, popularised by Musk and Feynman. Produces genuinely novel solutions by eliminating convention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a deliberate visual direction before any UI is built — the single biggest lever against generic AI output. Derives a posture from product-soul/PRD/specs, scores a curated archetype palette, then generates 2-3 GENUINELY DISTINCT directions and compares them side-by-side before committing to one. Load when the user asks to pick an aesthetic, choose a design direction, decide what a UI should feel like, explore visual options, says "what should this look like", "make it feel like [Linear/Apple/ Duolingo]", "give me design directions", "explore some looks", or when frontend-design routes here. Replaces design-archetype. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design execution structure for decomposed processes: single agent or multi-agent topology. Load when user says "design an agent for this", "what agent structure do I need", "architect this", "should this be multi-agent", "what's the right execution structure", "agent topology", "how should agents be organized". Takes process-decomposer output as primary input. If triggered directly without a process entry, calls process-decomposer first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough idea into a fully approved design before any code is written. Load when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, design a feature, think through approaches, plan a new capability, or figure out what to build. Also triggers on "let's think through", "help me design", "explore options", "what's the best approach for", "I have an idea for", "before we build", or any request to design something before implementation. Enforces a hard gate: no code, no implementation until user approves a design. For executable feature specs (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then), route to `feature-spec` instead — brainstorming owns approach and architecture, not machine-readable requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the experimentation skill suite — turn assumptions and product questions into rigorous, well-instrumented experiments and decision-grade readouts. Routes through backlog → spec → runbook → readout based on user need and existing artefacts. Platform-agnostic with PostHog as the primary binding. Load when the user asks to design an experiment, A/B test something, set up an experiment, run a holdout, test a hypothesis, decide what to test next, read out experiment results, analyse a test, or says "should we A/B test this", "experiment on the landing page", "is this lift real", "ship or kill this test", "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "test the pricing page", "validate this with an experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。