Acceptance testing workflow for the Software Metrics Machine CLI e2e suite. Use when writing, extending, debugging, or reviewing bashunit acceptance tests under apps/cli/e2e, including command help checks, cached fixture flows, GitHub MSW-backed flows, local git repository fixtures, SMM_STORE_DATA_AT workspaces, and pnpm run test:cli:acceptance. USE FOR: CLI acceptance tests, e2e tests, bashunit, apps/cli/e2e, command smoke tests, persisted CLI output tests. DO NOT USE FOR: unit tests or Vitest tests (use tdd skill), linting (use lint skill), webapp browser tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Side-Projects-4-Fun/software-metrics-machine☆ 152026年10月12日 更新
Test-Driven Development workflow for Software Metrics Machine. Covers test frameworks (Vitest 4.x for CLI/REST/core/utils, Jest 30.x for webapp), test patterns (describe/it, builder pattern, mocks via vi.fn), test commands, coverage requirements, and the Red-Green-Refactor cycle. USE FOR: write tests, run tests, test this, add tests, testing, coverage, TDD, test-driven development, vitest, jest, test pattern, test convention. DO NOT USE FOR: linting (use lint skill), building (use build commands directly), debugging production issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Side-Projects-4-Fun/software-metrics-machine☆ 152026年10月12日 更新
Applies local reliability, viewport, tab-safety, stale-ref, widget, and browser-boundary lessons to every agent-browser automation. Use alongside the upstream agent-browser skill whenever navigating, clicking, filling, testing, extracting, taking screenshots, or debugging any website with agent-browser.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aspiers/ai-config☆ 152026年10月9日 更新
Debug React hooks infinite loops, stale closures, and missing dependencies. Systematic approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
porcupine-md/jonggrang☆ 152026年9月15日 更新
Use when building APIs on Hono (Cloudflare Workers, Bun, Deno, Node), debugging route ordering, wiring middleware, validating with @hono/zod-validator, returning streaming responses, configuring CORS with credentials, handling errors via app.onError, or composing typed RPC clients. Triggers: c.env binding types, c.header + c.redirect interaction, missing await next() bugs, Set-Cookie not attaching to redirect, route-precedence surprises, JWT middleware setup, hono/client typed RPC end-to-end. NOT for Express/Fastify/Koa idioms, tRPC/GraphQL paradigms, or Next.js Route Handlers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Build and extend pd-console — Port Daddy's GPU-native macOS operator console (GPUI 0.2.x, Zed's Rust UI). Covers the render-agnostic Block/Pane(Surface) contract, the two-thread reqwest↔smol refresh pipeline, Taffy flexbox layout, uniform_list virtual scroll, focus + keyboard nav, the OKLCH theme and ICS maritime flag badges, GPUI's missing text-input, and the real feature-gated cargo/CI gate. Use when adding panes, visual polish, or debugging GPUI rendering/layout/focus in core/pd-console. NOT for the TypeScript daemon, generic Rust toolchain/borrow-checker help (use rust-with-claude-code), or non-pd GPUI apps with a different theme/architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Design error handling strategies for TypeScript and Python applications — exception hierarchies, Result/Either types, retry patterns, error boundaries, and structured error logging. Use when designing error handling architecture, choosing between exceptions and Result types, implementing retry logic, or building error recovery flows. Activate on "error handling", "exception hierarchy", "Result type", "retry pattern", "circuit breaker", "error boundary", "Pokemon exception". NOT for debugging specific runtime errors, logging infrastructure setup, or monitoring/alerting configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Use when CPU usage is high, memory grows unboundedly, goroutines leak, mutex contention shows in traces, or escape analysis suggests excess heap allocation. Triggers: net/http/pprof endpoint exposure, go tool pprof analysis, flamegraph generation, allocs vs inuse_space heap profiles, runtime/trace event timeline, mutex profiling, block profiling, goroutine dumps, GC pressure measurement. NOT for non-Go languages, distributed tracing (use OpenTelemetry skill), or production telemetry pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Expert debugger for Next.js + Cloudflare Workers + Supabase stacks. Systematic troubleshooting for auth, caching, workers, RLS, CORS, and build issues. Activate on: 'debug', 'not working', 'error', 'broken', '500', '401', '403', 'cache issue', 'RLS', 'CORS'. NOT for: feature development (use language skills), architecture design (use system-architect).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Analyze hierarchical DAG-like systems by separating undirected substrate from ordering metadata, then classifying diamonds, mixers, shortcuts, and hidden cycle structure. Use for workflow architecture, citation or genealogy DAG comparison, and information-flow diagnosis. NOT for ordinary cycle detection in arbitrary graphs, one-node runtime debugging, or systems with no real ordering constraint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Operations, debugging, and optimization for DAG workflows. Performs root cause analysis on failures, profiles execution performance, aggregates results from parallel branches, bridges context between nodes, and learns patterns from execution history. Activate on "DAG failed", "why did it fail", "root cause", "performance profile", "aggregate results", "merge branches", "execution patterns", "optimize DAG". NOT for planning DAGs (use dag-planner), executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), or validating outputs (use dag-quality).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Traces complete execution paths through DAG workflows. Records timing, inputs, outputs, and state transitions for all nodes. Activate on 'execution trace', 'trace execution', 'execution path', 'debug execution', 'execution log'. NOT for performance analysis (use dag-performance-profiler) or failure investigation (use dag-failure-analyzer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Performs root cause analysis on DAG execution failures. Traces failure propagation, identifies systemic issues, and generates actionable remediation guidance. Activate on 'failure analysis', 'root cause', 'why did it fail', 'debug failure', 'error investigation'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or performance issues (use dag-performance-profiler).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Executes DAG workflows with parallel wave processing, agent spawning, context isolation, permission enforcement, and full execution tracing. Use when running a planned DAG, managing concurrent agent execution, enforcing isolation boundaries, or tracing execution for debugging. Activate on "execute DAG", "run workflow", "spawn agents", "parallel execution", "execution trace", "agent isolation". NOT for planning DAGs (use dag-planner), validating outputs (use dag-quality), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Use when applying Cloudflare D1 migrations, fighting Supabase migration history vs SQL execution, choosing direct psql over CLI, designing idempotent migrations, debugging schema drift between local and remote, or recovering after a half-applied migration. Triggers: supabase migration repair instructions appearing, table missing after "applied" status, "Tenant or user not found" when running psql, --remote vs --local D1 confusion, NOT NULL on a populated column, foreign key constraint failures, drift between staging and prod schemas. NOT for Mongo/document migrations, ORM-managed migrations specifically (Prisma/Drizzle have their own conventions), or pure data backfills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Interprets GitHub Actions run status and logs, diagnoses CI failure patterns, and suggests targeted fixes. Handles dependency install failures, test timeouts, build OOM, flaky tests, and workflow misconfigurations. Activate on: 'CI failing', 'build broken', 'workflow error', 'GitHub Actions debug', 'flaky CI', 'pipeline timeout', 'CI red'. NOT for: writing new workflows from scratch (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), CI caching strategy (use ci-cache-optimizer), deployment orchestration (use devops-automator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Structured step-by-step reasoning before acting, to avoid guessing. For complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis checks. NOT for being stuck on approach (mk:problem-solving).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Resolves an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict: reads conflict state, recovers each side's intent, resolves hunks, runs checks. NOT for the ship pipeline (mk:ship); NOT for bug debugging (mk:fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Systematic root-cause debugging that produces a diagnostic report (mk:fix applies the fix; mk:build-fix owns compile failures). Use for 'debug this', 'why is this broken', 'root cause'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Answer factual project questions (codebase, architecture) with cited evidence. NOT for brainstorming, trade-offs (mk:party), debugging (mk:investigate), review (mk:review), or plans (mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Build error triage: detect language, load fix patterns, auto-retry. Chains into mk:verify. NOT for runtime errors (mk:fix); NOT for architecture debugging (mk:investigate).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新