「diff」の検索結果

Establish durable brand and voice context for cross-skill consumption. Generates BRAND.md (audience, positioning, do/don't editorial rules, taboo phrases, competitor differentiation) and VOICE.md (existing persona JSON re-expressed as readable prose), both written to the project root. When present, the blog orchestrator loads these files, fenced as untrusted data, for write, rewrite, brief, outline, calendar, and strategy workflows. Pairs with blog-persona, which manages the structured persona JSON. Use when the user says "blog brand", "create brand context", "BRAND.md", "VOICE.md", "establish editorial brand". Not for learning a voice from existing posts (blog-style) or managing persona JSON (blog-persona).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports a free local mode (file analysis) and a paid DataForSEO API mode that runs only after the user approves the call count. Outputs a severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when the user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages". Not a site audit (blog-audit) or cluster planning (blog-cluster); it changes no files or redirects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of finished work. Treats any "done" as a set of claims, then re-runs the claimed verifications, diffs what actually changed, detects weakened tests and false completion claims, and delivers an evidence-based verdict (VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED). Use after any agent or model claims work is complete - "/fable-judge", "judge this work", "verify what it did", "did that actually work?". Also runs the fable-method trap suite against a skill or model via "/fable-judge suite TARGET".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When to delegate to `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit) or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of working inline or using `Explore`. Their output is compressed, so main context lasts longer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to discover, evaluate, or prioritize App Store keywords. Also use when the user mentions "keyword research", "find keywords", "search volume", "keyword difficulty", "keyword ideas", or "what keywords should I target". For implementing keywords into metadata, see metadata-optimization. For auditing current keyword performance, see aso-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure a Next.js app using posthog-js so session recording and dead-click capture survive browser ad blockers. Aliases the three blocker-flagged JS chunks (dead-clicks-autocapture.js, recorder.js, posthog-recorder.js) to bland same-origin paths via Next.js rewrites, and monkey-patches HTMLScriptElement so posthog-js requests the aliases. TRIGGER when posthog-js session replay or dead-click capture is failing in production with ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT or 404s on /static/dead-clicks-autocapture.js / /static/recorder.js / /static/posthog-recorder.js, or when the user wants to bypass ad blockers for these specific assets. Works alongside an existing PostHog reverse proxy (managed or otherwise) — only the three blocked files divert through Next.js, all other PostHog traffic stays on the original api_host. SKIP for unrelated PostHog setup, non-Next.js apps, or when capture/decide endpoints (/e/, /decide/, /array/*/config.js) are the ones being blocked — those need a different treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs worksheets, workbooks and practice material that actually teach — sequencing difficulty, managing cognitive load, writing instructions a child can follow unaided, and building answer keys that hold up. Use this to design or fix a worksheet or workbook, decide how much practice a skill needs, structure a page so it can be completed without an adult reading it aloud, or diagnose material that looks right and does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a reasoned response rather than compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs slide decks and one-pagers that carry an argument rather than decorate one — deck structure, headlines that state the takeaway, charts that make a single point, and the different rules board decks and conference talks follow. Use this to build or fix a pitch deck, board deck, or conference talk, to design a one-pager, or when a deck is dense, unfocused, or being read aloud from the slides. For social graphics, carousels and infographics, use `marketing:visual-content` instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces design reference imagery before implementation — screen concepts, layout directions, and flows for web or mobile that make a verbal brief concrete enough to argue with. Use this when a brief needs visualizing before anyone builds, when comparing layout directions, when handing a developer a target, or when stakeholders are describing different things with the same words.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and maintains the design system a product is assembled from — tokens for color, type, spacing and elevation, component contracts, and the rules that keep them coherent as the product grows. Use this when starting a new interface, when screens have drifted apart visually, when the same component exists three times in slightly different forms, or when a token or component needs adding without breaking what exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute shell commands for system operations, directory creation, and script execution. When you need to run system commands, execute scripts, install packages, or manage processes. Note - if commands fail consecutively, try different approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Switch to a specific browser tab by index. When you need to work with a different tab or return to previous page. Use browser_list_tabs to get tab indices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for correctness, security, and maintainability. Supports local git diffs (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). Use when the user asks to review code, check a PR, audit changes, or wants feedback on code quality before merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get current time, format dates, calculate date differences, and convert timezones. Use this skill when the user asks about time, dates, timezone conversions, weekdays, or needs date calculations and formatting in any locale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve conflicts and merges when several branches are open against one repo at the same time — the hotspot files every change must touch (registry manifests, a single version field, shared tool config, one aggregated test module, tracked build output), union-vs-recompute-vs-rebuild as three different correct resolutions, generated artifacts that must never be merged, non-deterministic serialization that makes every branch conflict, renumbered identifiers that git cannot show you, and why a clean auto-merge is not a passing test. Use when rebasing or merging a long-lived branch, resolving conflict markers, reviewing a merge commit, deciding what a repo should commit vs generate, or setting up a repo that will take parallel contributions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a change to the ffmpeg-skill repository for the failures its own contract makes possible — a claim in a result document that is true at one layer and false at the layer a caller reads, a new flag that reaches the code but not the contract/docs/demo surfaces, a "bug" that docs/design-decisions.md already decided with a pinning test, a fix with no regression test, a new runtime dependency or a raw ffmpeg shell call that breaks the scope boundary, a SKILL.md line added without one trimmed, a review that re-derives findings from a summary instead of the tree at the reviewed commit. Use when asked to review a PR or diff in this repository, when authoring code here and needing a pre-commit check, or when triaging an external review or audit report about this codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a change everywhere the same fact is stated — enumerating the full surface inventory (landing copy, docs, machine-readable summaries, changelog badges repeated across every page, sitemap, README, descriptions embedded in code, and untyped frontend consumers of typed responses), generating a surface instead of restating it, drift tests where you cannot generate, never hand-maintaining a copy of a surface another codebase owns, shipping a paired PR when you change a format a different codebase decodes, and keeping overloaded product words apart. Use when adding or renaming a user-facing feature, editing product/marketing copy or docs, renaming a serialized response field, changing a serialization or share-link format, wiring one repo's output into another's checks, or reviewing a PR that touched only one place a fact appears.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete conventional oncology bulk-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, prognostic filtering or risk modeling, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic/prognostic evaluation, clinical association, immune infiltration context, methylation context, and optional tissue or cell validation. Covers five study patterns (signature-first prognostic workflow, hub-gene-first biomarker workflow, hybrid signature-to-hub workflow, immune-context biomarker workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete dual-disease shared-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided disease pair and shared-biology direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a non-oncology two-disease transcriptome study centered on per-disease differential expression, shared-signal intersection or concordance, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic evaluation across both diseases, immune infiltration context, pathway interpretation, and optional orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns (shared-DEG-first workflow, hub-gene-first shared-biomarker workflow, hybrid shared-biomarker compression workflow, immune-context shared-biomarker workflow, orthogonal validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。