「domain」の検索結果

Deep OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect security assessment. Covers the full attack surface: redirect_uri validation bypass (path traversal, open redirect chains, subdomain confusion, URL parsing tricks, parameter pollution, response mode switching), missing/broken state parameter CSRF, PKCE downgrade and absent-challenge attacks, implicit grant token leakage (Referer, browser history, XSS fragment theft), authorization code injection, scope escalation, client confusion attacks, mutable-claims account takeover (iss+sub confusion, email-keyed identity merging), pre-account takeover via unverified registration, OpenID Connect dynamic client registration SSRF (logo_uri, jwks_uri, sector_identifier_uri, request_uri), nonce replay, ID token validation failures, Device Code phishing flow, mobile custom URI scheme hijacking, refresh token persistence, token introspection enumeration, consent screen clickjacking, host header injection, and cross-IdP mix-up attacks. Uses KOAuth, jwt_tool, nuclei oauth templates, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual request payloads and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /api-security when OAuth endpoints are discovered. Chains into /web-exploit for open redirect, XSS, and SSRF chaining. Chains into /post-exploit when full account takeover is achieved. Chains into /credential-audit when access tokens or refresh tokens are recovered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic fuzzing across two dimensions: (1) content discovery — hidden directories, files, backup/source leaks, HTTP verb enumeration, 401/403 bypass via path manipulation; (2) input validation — auth/token stripping, type confusion, boundary value analysis, HTTP parameter pollution, header fuzzing, cookie fuzzing, mass assignment discovery, and entropy/predictability analysis of any generated value. Works on any domain. Chains from /web-exploit or /pentester; chains into /business-logic when boundary violations, predictable IDs, or mass assignment are confirmed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a Kerberoasting attack to extract Service Principal Name (SPN) ticket hashes from Active Directory and crack them offline. This allows an attacker with any valid domain credentials to escalate privileges by obtaining the plaintext password of highly-privileged service accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNS rebinding attack playbook. Use when testing applications that trust DNS resolution for origin checks, interact with internal services from browser context, or when SSRF is not possible server-side but the target has client-side fetch/XHR to attacker-controlled domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) misconfigurations. Use this skill when auditing APIs or web applications that share sensitive data across domains, forcing victims' browsers to inadvertently leak private information (e.g., API keys, PII, CSRF tokens) to an attacker-controlled website.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and attack session cookies via missing Secure/HttpOnly/SameSite attributes, overly broad Domain/Path scope, non-expiring persistent cookies, absent __Host- and __Secure- prefixes, browser cache leakage (Cache-Control: no-store missing), session token predictability via Burp Sequencer analysis, server-side session not invalidated on logout, and SSO single-logout bypass. Tools: Burp Suite Repeater/Sequencer, OWASP ZAP, EditThisCookie, Tamper Data, Cookiebro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Active Directory security audit using the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Full domain enumeration, trust mapping, GPO analysis, ACL abuse paths, ADCS attacks (ESC1-ESC8), delegation abuse (constrained/unconstrained/RBCD), fine-grained password policies, LAPS deployment, service account security, and Kerberos configuration. Uses enum4linux-ng, netexec, impacket, ldapsearch, certipy-ad, bloodhound-python, and rpcclient. Produces attack path diagrams, prioritized risk register, and PoCs. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) misconfigurations, specifically ESC1. By requesting a certificate based on a overly permissive template that allows the enrollee to supply a Subject Alternative Name (SAN), an attacker can impersonate highly privileged users (like Domain Admins) and seamlessly escalate privileges across the entire AD environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit Active Directory replication privileges (DS-Replication-Get-Changes) to perform a DCSync attack, allowing an attacker to impersonate a Domain Controller and extract password hashes (like the krbtgt hash for Golden Tickets) without code execution on a DC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this agent when you need to perform custom bioinformatics analyses on genes or proteins that go beyond standard database lookups. This includes situations where existing domain/family annotations from UniProt are insufficient, when you need to verify dubious annotations, or when you need to perform comparative analyses across gene sets. The agent creates reproducible analysis pipelines with proper dependency management and documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal, security, privacy, and deliverability requirements every delivered app must satisfy — legal pages, PII/deletion rights, CSP/Trusted-Types/Zod, AI-agent security, RFC7807 errors, email domain auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish project thesis before first code. Infer product type from domain/folder/README. Identify users, business model, pSEO strategy, AI-native dev approach. Maintain PROJECT_BRIEF.md as source of truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resend email setup, domain verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for a whole-corpus, read-only audit of tracked stablecoin static metadata and domain sidecars, especially after catalog changes or when factual or internal-consistency drift needs review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when hosting, deploying, or operating an app on the Prisma Platform: projects, branches, preview environments, services and their versions, Prisma Postgres databases, object-store buckets, environment variables, custom domains, logs, or the GitHub integration. Triggers on "Prisma Platform", "Prisma Compute", "Prisma Postgres", "Prisma Storage", "preview environment", `prisma deploy`, `prisma dev`, `prisma auth`, `prisma project`, `prisma branch`, `prisma service`, `prisma postgres`, `prisma bucket`, `prisma git`, `prisma.config.ts`, promote, rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a Prisma Next structured error envelope and route to the right recovery — code, domain, severity, why, fix, meta. Use for error, exception, my emit failed, my query won't typecheck, my query crashed, my migration won't apply, MIGRATION.HASH_MISMATCH, BUDGET.ROWS_EXCEEDED, BUDGET.TIME_EXCEEDED, RUNTIME.ABORTED, PLAN.HASH_MISMATCH, CONTRACT.MARKER_MISSING, PN-RUN-3001, PN-RUN-3002, PN-RUN-3030, PN-MIG-2001, PN-CLI-4011, PN-SCHEMA-0001, drift, capability missing, planner conflict, prisma studio, EXPLAIN, query log, db.end, db.close, script won't exit, hangs, close connection, pool.end, client is closed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts indicators of compromise from raw analysis artifacts: parsing strings dumps, sandbox reports, PCAP summaries, and logs for URLs, domains, IPs, hashes, mutexes, and file paths, then deduplicating and typing them. Activates for requests to extract IOCs from analysis output, pull indicators from a report, or harvest atomic indicators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares indicators of compromise for safe sharing: defanging URLs, domains, IPs, and emails so they cannot be accidentally clicked or resolved, and formatting them into STIX/CSV/MISP-friendly output. Activates for requests to defang IOCs, sanitize indicators for a report, or export indicators for sharing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fine-tune large language models — data curation, SFT, parameter-efficient methods (LoRA), evaluation, and avoiding common training failures. Use when a base model needs task-specific behavior or domain knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before designing, training, or auditing ANY model that replicates human-annotated labels, audit the annotation protocol's INPUT — the exact document/evidence the human labelers consulted — and give the model that same input. Use when: (1) designing a classifier/LLM extractor whose target is a hand-coded label set, (2) a label-replication model shows low recall concentrated in a label subset and the diagnosis on offer is "the label's information is not in the features", (3) reviewers propose construct splits (e.g. "designation vs record-evident"), adjudication sittings, or per-domain stop rules to explain residual disagreement with gold, (4) validating an extraction pipeline against labels transcribed from a source document. Symptom of the underlying failure: elaborate theory accumulates to explain why gold is "partially unpredictable" when the model was simply never shown the document the annotators read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix slow pyfixest regression GRIDS (many feols/fepois calls run sequentially) that stay slow despite demeaner_backend="cupy64" and an idle GPU. Use when: (1) a script looping dozens of pf.feols models on a 100k+ row panel takes ~1 min/model, (2) process inspection shows ~1-1.5 cores busy and nvidia-smi shows ~0% GPU utilization with a resident cupy context, (3) planning any worker prompt that will run a model grid (robustness variants x FE structures x domains). Root cause: per-model CPU-side single-threaded fixed costs (formulaic model-matrix build, interaction construction, singleton detection, cluster vcov) dominate wall time; GPU demeaning is a small slice. Fix: shard the model grid across OS processes and/or use pyfixest multiple-estimation syntax; mandate this IN THE WORKER PROMPT.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-shot module map — go up a layer of abstraction and get a domain-vocabulary module map of the codebase. Use when lost in unfamiliar code, after a long deep-dive session, or when you need to re-orient before planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement event-driven side effects that react to domain events

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。