「eth」の検索結果

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cite-or-Block 架构的基石原子 skill。把报告里的 citation 锚点 (例如 [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) 解析为源文件片段,并核对事实声明里的关键词是否在引用源原文里出现。 Foundation atomic skill for the Cite-or-Block architecture. Resolves citation anchors (e.g. [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) to raw source text fragments, and verifies whether claim keywords actually appear in the cited source. 使用场景 / Use when: 1. 报告生成后要做 fact-check (resolve_citation + verify_claim_against_source) 2. content-verification-layer 要扫全报告锚点 (parse_citations_in_text) 3. drug-citation-verifier / 任何 cross-check skill 需要"锚点 → 源原文" P0 守护:本 skill **绝不维护任何已知字典**。源里没有 = verified=False, 无例外、无 fallback、无"已知答案兜底"。 P0 guard: this skill **never maintains any built-in dictionary**. Not in source = verified=False. No fallback, no built-in answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships. Use when output must clear two independent adversarial reviewers before it ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .xltx, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex adapter for Garry Tan's full gstack methodology across CEO/product pressure, CTO architecture, design, engineering, QA, security, shipping, documentation, and retrospectives. Use when the 总控/CEO or 架构/CTO role needs gstack method routing, implementation-plan hardening, or the user says gstack should help a role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates ideas with named methods from creative practice (SCAMPER, lateral provocations, constraints, pataphysics, and more), routed to the user's situation. Use for open-ended generative or selective requests: "I want to make or start something", "I'm stuck", "inspire me", "make this weirder", "help me pick", or inventing a research question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose the design and the numbers a research run can honestly claim — write the structured METHOD RECORD (databases, date of access, search string, criteria, screening counts) that r0 validates, pick the claim strength a design can actually carry, record a statistic as data rather than prose, route to the reporting guideline the design owes, and decide what to preregister. Use when a run's question, design, search or statistics have to be settled before the writing, or when a claim needs a strength or a number attached to it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record the statements a journal requires and a reader checks — authors with their CRediT contributions, ethics approval that names the body and the reference number, how consent was taken, funding with grant numbers, conflicts of interest, data availability with an address or a reason, and the use of generative AI — as a validated record that the submission folder prints and the manuscript never carries. Use when a run is heading for submission, when an author asks who should be listed, when consent, approval or data sharing has to be stated, or when the venue's AI policy comes up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when reviewing vendor estimates for software development projects. Use this skill when you need to evaluate whether a vendor's cost estimate, timeline, and approach are reasonable and whether the project is likely to succeed. This skill helps identify gaps, risks, overestimates, underestimates, and unfavorable contract terms. It generates comprehensive Markdown review reports with actionable recommendations to optimize costs while ensuring project success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KPI体系設計とOKR策定支援スキル。ビジネス目標に整合したKPI設計、バランススコアカード、OKRフレームワーク、 ダッシュボード設計を提供。SMART原則、リーディング/ラギング指標の選定を支援。 Use when designing KPI frameworks, implementing OKR methodology, or creating performance measurement systems. Triggers: "KPI design", "OKR", "performance metrics", "balanced scorecard", "dashboard design", "measurement framework".

Use this skill for critical code review that focuses on whether the code actually works correctly and achieves the expected results - not just whether it matches a design document. This skill assumes designs can be wrong, finds bugs the design didn't anticipate, and verifies end-to-end correctness. Triggers include "critical code review", "deep code review", "verify this implementation works", "find bugs in this code", or reviewing implementation against requirements. NOTE - Security review is OUT OF SCOPE; use a dedicated security review skill for that purpose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloudflare Durable Objects の実装とレビューに使用する。チャットルーム、マルチプレイ、予約システムなどの状態を持つ協調処理、RPC methods、SQLite storage、alarms、WebSockets、Workers統合、wrangler設定、Vitestでのテストを扱う。事前学習の知識より最新のCloudflare docsの取得を優先する。

Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitive positioning diagnostic — figures out where you actually stand relative to competitors and whether that position is defensible. Use this skill when someone needs to understand their real competitive position (not the one on the slide deck), when a new competitor has entered the market, when customers are switching and nobody can explain why, when pricing power is eroding, when a strategic investment depends on knowing whether the moat is real, or when leadership says "we're differentiated" but can't explain how. Draws on Playing to Win, Porter's generic strategies, and Blue Ocean thinking — applied as diagnosis, not planning. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

吉里吉里Z (krkrz) の -replweb HTTP+SSE サーバ (WebServer クラス) にブラウザ UI を載せて、本体アプリの操作/編集/観測パネルをブラウザ側に組み込む方法論。ゲーム本体は 3D 表示やゲーム内 UI に専念させ、編集ツール・インスペクター・ダッシュボード・REPL コンソールをブラウザ (別ウィンドウ/別PC) から使う構成を作るときに読む。プラグインや TJS がサーバへエンドポイントを追加公開する手順 (WebServer.register / serveStatic / broadcast)、ハンドラ呼び出し規約 (req %[method,path,query,body,bytes] → 文字列/octet/整数/辞書)、状態同期パターン (fetch POST + SSE /sub push + throttle + 差分/tick 配信)、既存 REPL コンソール (/events + /cmd) の UI 埋め込み、ブラウザのアプリモード起動 (Chromium --app / -webui)、json.dll 連携、TJS2 由来のハマりどころ (ローカル関数クロージャ不在→クラス化 / ブロックコメントのネスト誤爆 / startup 例外の致命性 / ハンドラは必ずメインスレッド実行) を網羅。エンジン側 WebServer クラスそのものの仕様は krkrz core doc/REPL.md、REPL/Agent 駆動は skill krkrz-repl、Elements ネイティブ UI は skill elements、TJS2 言語は skill tjs2、本体 API は skill krkrz を参照。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ПОДКЛЮЧИТЬ Telegram на ЭТОЙ машине — оба стека сразу: Telethon-рельса (роботы, 0 LLM) и MCP (живые сессии). Триггеры «/tg-connect», «/tg-login», «подключи телегу», «подключи телеграм на этой машине», «залогинь телегу», «телега отвалилась», «AuthKeyDuplicated», «перелогинь аккаунт <имя>», «настрой telethon и mcp», «connect telegram», «relogin telegram»

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review content quality before anything is shown or sent (vault notes, outgoing drafts, dedup merges, service files) and return an explicit pass, fail or manual-review verdict. The counterpart of a post-build test gate: that one asks whether the build works, this one whether the writing is fit to show. Triggers: "/taste-check <path|text>", "/taste", "check this note".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether something was already decided before proposing it: searches the decisions journal, the declined registry and the rules codex plus semantic search, and returns what was decided, why, what was rejected, and under what condition to revisit. Triggers: "/precedent <topic>", "did we already decide this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。