「every」の検索結果

ENHANCE overlay on [[dspy]] — the upfront rubric for choosing a reasoning SHAPE (Predict / ChainOfThought / ReAct / ProgramOfThought) BEFORE you write a prompt or pick an optimizer. The local `dspy` skill lists the modules but never surfaces the *selection criterion*: reasoning shape is chosen by task structure, not by reflexively defaulting to CoT. Activate every time a new LM-calling node/step is added to a pipeline. Do NOT activate for one-shot prompts, optimizer/teleprompter choice (that is the dspy SOP's job), or non-LM control flow. Search keywords: chain of thought vs ReAct, when to use CoT, reasoning type, ReAct vs CoT vs PoT, which dspy module, predict vs chain of thought.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a coherent, whole-paper mathematical modeling solution framework from a complete contest problem. Use after the user supplies a CUMCM or other modeling problem and asks for modeling ideas, an overall solution plan, question-by-question analysis, candidate-model comparison, model-selection reasons, innovations, validation, or cross-question linkage. For every question, explain the task and mathematical essence, compare multiple feasible models in tables, recommend a route with explicit reasons, and keep all questions connected through shared data, variables, parameters, constraints, and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate a complete mathematical modeling contest problem sentence by sentence into precise modeling language, preserve every substantive condition and definition, expose hidden constraints, draw a mandatory Mermaid cross-question flowchart, audit omissions, and deliver one easy-to-open Markdown report. For Huawei Cup (CPGMCM) graduate-contest problems, additionally prepend a plain-language layer that rewrites the background and questions as a primary-school word problem with a mandatory term-mapping table. Optionally render the finished report as one standalone HTML page on request. Use whenever a user supplies a CUMCM, CPGMCM, or other modeling problem and asks to interpret, translate, unpack, read closely, identify requirements, or avoid missing details before modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific CVE or vulnerability disclosure end-to-end — what version is affected, is your code reachable, is there a public PoC, is there a patch, what's the exposure window, what's the mitigation if you can't patch immediately. Use when the user mentions 'CVE,' 'vulnerability research,' 'is this CVE relevant,' 'zero-day,' 'CISA KEV,' 'GitHub Security Advisory,' 'reachability analysis,' 'patch analysis,' 'exploit availability,' 'EPSS,' 'CVSS,' or 'should we drop everything and patch this.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than $smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the project's full verification gate: every check the project defines as a pass/fail condition, built from its CI config, check scripts, and configured tools, or from a formatter-linter-test baseline when it declares none. Use when the user asks to "run checks", "run the verification gate", "run lint and tests", "run the test suite", "check that this passes", "does this pass CI", or "run the project's checks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult ChatGPT Pro via ChatGPT browser automation for problems that resist standard approaches. Use when stuck on a very hard problem, when standard approaches have failed, when multiple debugging attempts haven't worked, or when the user says "ask the oracle", "consult oracle", "consult chatgpt", "I'm completely stuck", "I've tried everything", or "nothing is working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than /smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete UI/UX design capability — a wiki-style knowledge map of design theory (UX laws, Nielsen heuristics, usability, visual hierarchy, typography, contrast/WCAG, design systems, aesthetics-vs-conversion) fused with a hands-on execution playbook for building distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces. Use when designing or building any UI (websites, landing pages, dashboards, components, apps), reviewing or critiquing UI/UX, diagnosing why a design doesn't convert, or styling/beautifying web interfaces. Grounds every visual decision in UX principles and avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially review something just built — presume it is broken and find where. Use after implementing a feature, finishing a build, or before shipping, or whenever ATLAS or Boss wants a hostile second opinion on a diff, a running app, or a whole codebase. Spawns clean-context reviewers with opposing lenses (correctness, security, empty-world) and reproduces every finding by running the target before believing it. Distinct from /code-review, which statically reads a diff and never runs the app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the task involves scheduling future work — any "remind me at …", "every weekday …", "check again in 30 min", or closing a fired cron job. Also use to reschedule or list jobs. NOT for one-off in-session waits. NEVER edit jobs.md by hand (the cron parser is strict).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble an ordered FF&E specification book from selected product cut sheets, with every product accounted for and verified package receipts. Use for grouped sheets or a combined FF&E book; use spec-writer for Project Manual sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Low-level Python plotting for scientific figures: publication-quality line, scatter, bar, heatmap, contour, 3D; multi-panel layouts; fine control of every element. PNG/PDF/SVG export. Use seaborn for quick stats, plotly for interactive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

omics-plotting: publication-style figure authoring for omics / bioinformatics results with matplotlib / seaborn. Read this before writing any plotting or figure code in any omics analysis — RNA-seq, proteomics, single-cell, variant, or database results — not only when a plot is explicitly requested: whenever an analysis will produce a figure, load this first and follow its recipes. Covers volcano, MA, expression / correlation heatmap, GSEA bar / dot plot, box / violin / bar / ridgeline, PCA / UMAP / t-SNE scatter, Kaplan–Meier, Manhattan / QQ / forest. Supplies a shared journal-ready style and copy-paste recipes so every figure looks like one consistent system. To combine several plots into ONE multi-panel composite figure, use the sibling `multipanel` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble multiple plots into ONE publication-ready multi-panel journal figure (e.g. Figure 1 with panels A, B, C). Use whenever the user asks to combine, compose, or lay out several plots as a single composite figure — newly plotted from data or from already-rendered panels the user supplies (PNG/PDF). Ask the user to pick one of two approaches: (1) redraw every panel into one unified figure using independent, tightly packed `subfigures` (each sized to its own labels, so axes need NOT align), consistent style, correctly placed panel letters, and per-panel legends/colorbars; (2) composite already-rendered PNG/PDF panels onto a mosaic canvas and add panel letters (image compositing, not plotting). Both export vector PDF + high-DPI PNG. For a SINGLE plot from a data table, use the sibling `omics-plotting` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially fact-check DOCS.md files against the actual source code, verifying every concrete claim rather than trusting structure checks. Use when the user asks to audit docs, verify documentation accuracy, check whether docs are still true, or on a scheduled documentation review. This is the semantic layer the mechanical checkers cannot cover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts bank, credit card and brokerage statement PDFs, invoices and vendor price lists into clean CSV or Excel, then proves the extraction is complete and correct - opening balance plus transactions equals closing balance, every running balance chains, page totals, row counts and summary totals all tie, signs and decimal separators are consistent. Handles digital PDFs with word-position column bands and detects scanned PDFs that need OCR first. Use it whenever the user wants to convert a bank statement PDF to Excel or CSV, extract transactions from a statement, turn a PDF table into a spreadsheet, import statements into QuickBooks or Xero, or says the converted statement does not balance, rows are missing, or signs look wrong, even if they do not ask for a proof. Never reads amounts off the page image when a text layer exists, and never fixes a failed tie-out by guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and edits PowerPoint decks bound to a company's own .pptx or .potx template, with a consulting-grade storyline and a rendered visual QA pass. Maps the template's masters, layouts, placeholders, theme colors and fonts; drafts a storyboard of action titles (pyramid principle, SCR) for approval; fills the template's own placeholders instead of drawing text boxes; adds native charts in theme colors, tables sized to placeholders, speaker notes and source lines; then renders every slide to PNG and checks text overflow, off-slide and overlapping shapes, off-theme fonts and colors, empty placeholders and weak titles. Use whenever the user says use our template, company deck, brand or corporate template, make slides, build a deck, pptx, potx, consulting-style deck, board or client presentation, action titles, or fix my deck formatting, and whenever an existing deck must be edited without breaking its masters. Complements the generic pptx skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Respond to Google, Yelp, and industry reviews in the owner's voice -- gracious on the 5-stars, masterful on the 1-stars. Handles the angry customer, the unfair review, the fake review, and the one that mentions a legal or health issue. Every response written for the thousand future customers reading it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pulls financial statement numbers for US public companies straight from SEC EDGAR's free official XBRL APIs (companyfacts, companyconcept, frames, submissions) into a cited table. Every value carries its accession number, form, fiscal period, filed date, XBRL tag and a link to the filing, and the tool handles fiscal-year ends, quarterly vs YTD vs TTM, derived Q4, restatements and units. Use this whenever the user wants 10-K numbers or 10-Q numbers, says "pull financials for", asks for public company revenue, net income, EPS, cash, debt or capex, wants comps or a competitor side-by-side, a credit check, prospect research, or model inputs, or mentions SEC filings or EDGAR, even if they never say XBRL. Free and primary-source, no paid data terminal needed. Do not use it for private companies, stock prices or valuation multiples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define a product's motion design language -- duration and easing scales, choreography rules, and signature moves -- and export it as tokens plus ready-to-use Framer Motion variants and CSS. The difference between animations and a motion system: everything moves like it belongs to the same product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a local business found on Google -- audit and optimize the Google Business Profile, local pack ranking factors, review velocity, NAP consistency across directories, and location pages. For businesses whose customers search "near me," this outranks everything else in marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。