「reports」の検索結果

Use when running verbose CLI commands — wraps them with rtk (Rust Token Killer, third-party Apache-2.0; upstream reports 60-90% token savings). Covers installation, configuration, and usage patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill for creating, reading, editing, reviewing, redlining, commenting, or repairing Word `.docx` documents. Trigger for Word documents, DOCX files, memos, reports, letters, templates, tracked changes, comments, table of contents, headers, footers, page numbers, and Google Docs-targeted documents that should be authored as DOCX first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill whenever a PowerPoint `.pptx` deck is an input or output. Trigger for creating, editing, reviewing, repairing, templating, combining, splitting, rendering, or extracting slide decks, including pitch decks, reports, speaker notes, template-following, and Google Slides-targeted handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when reviewing rationale and change quality for plans, PBIs, commits, diffs, docs, specs, reports, or explicit artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Process] Use when the developer wants something explained or taught, or wants to know HOW TO REVIEW a change — by default the current working tasks + changes in context, or whatever the prompt names (a plan, a subsystem, a decision, a concept, a bug). AI derives WHAT to explain from the prompt and ALWAYS delivers a teacher-and-coach review guide, high level first then detail: what was done, a VISUAL MAP (system flowchart, domain ERD, sequence diagrams), the user stories and business rules with their REAL test-case IDs, a REVIEW PATH naming which files to open first and in what order with an exit criterion per stage, the technical concepts needed to follow it, how it works, why THIS solution, every alternative option with pros/cons, the trade-offs accepted, the blast radius, HOW TO TEST AND DEMO the change, the developer's decision levers, and written challenge prompts that provoke the reader to pressure-test the work. Works at ANY scope — from one line of code to the whole project: it SIZES the target into a scope tier, DECOMPOSES a large one into understanding groups, BREAKS the work into tasks before the first deep read, and ACCUMULATES the report group by group on disk so a huge explanation stays complete instead of thinning out. Writes the full report to a single combined markdown file (plans/reports/understand-*.md) that opens with a detailed summary section — or delivers it in full in chat when Step 3 finds no git-ignored directory for it — and always summarizes it in chat. Regardless of coding level. Never interrogates, never quizzes, never blocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Testing] Use when you need full-site QA audit (accessibility, performance, security, SEO) with visual reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Project Management] Use when you need to generate project status reports, track dependencies, manage risk registers, and facilitate team sync meetings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Git] Use when generating developer KPI, performance, contribution value, story point, man-day, or code-quality reports from local git commit history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kova/OpenClaw validation: benchmarks, release gates, scenarios, perf reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms data into compelling visual narratives by applying narrative structure, annotation techniques, scrollytelling patterns, and honest framing to data journalism, presentations, and infographics. Use when creating data-driven articles or reports, designing infographics with narrative, building scrollytelling experiences, annotating charts to guide interpretation, or when user mentions data storytelling, presentation design, annotated chart, narrative visualization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate findings and generate multi-format pentest reports with remediation roadmap and risk scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build repeatable data-to-Docs pipelines from Sheets and Drive sources. Use for automated status reports, template-based document assembly, and scheduled publishing workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run frontend functional, accessibility, visual, and performance test planning with structured reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update project test-case assets and test reports. Use when Codex is asked to generate test cases in Excel, produce a Word/DOCX test report, summarize automated test execution, turn repository tests into a formal testing artifact, or沉淀/复用 a project testing documentation workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run user-authorized black-box web security tests and evidence-based reports. Use for 黑盒安全测试、渗透测试、数据泄露、未授权访问、公开 JS/API、登录爆破防护、CORS 或安全响应头检查。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure and audit C/C++ code size, namespace distribution, function complexity, nesting, recurrence, and namespace coupling in the EMULATORS framework. Use when Codex needs codebase statistics, complexity baselines, namespace comparisons, duplication indicators, hotspots, architectural growth analysis, or before/after complexity reports while excluding third-party code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formatting, structure, and execution rules for Quarto markdown documents. Trigger when: - Writing, editing, or rendering Quarto documents, reports, presentations, or websites. - Files matching the pattern **/*.qmd are in the workspace or referenced. - Tasks involve: quarto render, quarto preview, knitr, jupyter. - Prompt contains keywords: quarto, qmd, yaml header, code chunk, callout, cross-reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the weekly "🧹 Housekeeping" digest — a render-only report of repo drift that needs a human eye (stale unmerged branches, mislabeled issues, stuck in-progress tickets, epics ready to close, idle PRs, label-coverage gaps). Reports only, never mutates. Use when asked for a "housekeeping report", "repo drift", "what's stale", or to run the weekly sweep by hand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user reports a hard bug, unexpected failure, or performance regression that needs root-cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for documents, reports, memos, guides, academic papers, or formal text that needs clear structure, reliable tone, formatting, and diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。