「status」の検索結果

Use for every progress update, status report, problem explanation, ETA, review, acceptance, or completion report to the operator/owner, especially when they ask “到哪了”, “什么问题”, “做了什么”, “结果呢”, “还要多久”, or “说人话”. Translate technical evidence into visible or operational outcomes before details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesise a status, standup, or situation-report from current work state. Trigger when a team member needs a concise summary of where things stand, what is blocked, and what is next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pursue an agreed goal to a working outcome without waiting: decompose it, re-prioritise as evidence arrives, branch, gate, get an independent review (a different model or a fresh reviewer subagent — the writer never approves), merge, prune, and bank the operator's decisions in STATUS.md instead of blocking on them. Trigger on "get it done", "don't wait for me", "proceed autonomously", or when an epic or roadmap objective is handed over. Not a close-out: this work set is expected to grow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG. Use as a meta-router when several skills could apply, and as the baseline for how delivery state is recorded. Trigger at the start of any multi-track epic, when the skill count exceeds ~12, or when the records have drifted from reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when governing a worktree across its whole life — scope-lock declaration, merge-readiness status, scoped verification, and safe cleanup that refuses while unique unmerged commits exist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boot the explicitly selected CLI(s) as the human's concierge: a project-aware side channel that sits ABOVE the running agent system in a shared writable terminal. It answers status questions and handles the human's ad hoc tasking while the working agents collaborate on the mesh — it is not a worker, manager, or gatekeeper, and team progress never waits for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use quando o usuário menciona issues do Jira (ex: "PROJ-123"), pergunta sobre tickets, quer criar/visualizar/atualizar issues, verificar status do sprint ou gerenciar seu workflow no Jira. Ativa em palavras-chave como "jira", "issue", "ticket", "sprint", "backlog" ou padrões de chaves de issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to run GitNexus CLI commands like analyze/index a repo, check status, clean the index, generate a wiki, or list indexed repos. Examples: "Index this repo", "Reanalyze the codebase", "Generate a wiki"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**REQUIRED** - Always activate FIRST on any git/VCS operations (commit, status, branch, push, etc.), especially when HEAD is detached. If `.jj/` exists -> this is a Jujutsu (jj) repo - raw git commands can corrupt data. Essential git safety instructions inside. DO NOT IGNORE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Project Management] Use when you need to generate project status reports, track dependencies, manage risk registers, and facilitate team sync meetings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a single GitHub PR by PR number. Check out the PR's branch, detect conflicts with the target branch via `gh pr status` (and label the PR with `cc-resolve-conflict` if any are found), generate and evaluate a fix plan via create-review-fix-plan, then take action (add cc-fix-onetime label if fixes are needed, or merge the PR if it's ready).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Virtual QA Lead that turns requirements into review-ready, TestRail-importable test cases in one conversation. Use it whenever the user has requirements, a spec, a user story, or acceptance criteria (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, TXT, MD, or pasted text) and wants test cases, a test plan, a checklist, test coverage, a regression suite, or a TestRail/Qase/Zephyr export, even without saying "test cases" ("write tests for this spec", "what should we check here?"). Especially useful when they attach their team's existing test cases to match. When the spec describes an API (endpoints, status codes, schemas, auth, OpenAPI/Swagger), Casely also builds a runnable Postman collection, so use it for "API tests", "Postman collection", or "tests I can run in Newman/CI". Triggers on the same request in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and safely clean local project repositories or workspaces with excessive generated files, old project residue, dirty Git status, stale worktrees, build caches, duplicate nested projects, confusing roots, or agent context/token waste. Use when the user asks to organize a repo, remove useless files, classify valid project files, clean untracked/deleted files, reduce disk usage, migrate from an old repo layout to a canonical project, or prepare a repository for future Codex/agent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

通过 ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 实时检索官方临床试验注册数据。触发词包括 ClinicalTrials.gov、临床试验、NCT、试验注册、招募状态、phase 1/2/3、RCT lookup、interventional trial、observational study。专注实时单次查询(≤1000 条/请求),适合"某试验最新状态/招募信息/主次要终点"场景。批量历史分析请用 aact-bulk-trials,文献检索用 pubmed-search/europepmc。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户询问 ClinicalTrials.gov / 临床试验 / NCT / 试验注册 / 招募状态 / phase 1/2/3 / RCT lookup / sponsor 检索 / interventional trial / observational study / 主次要终点 / trial outcomes / 试验招募中 / recruiting status 时,通过 ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 实时检索官方注册数据。专注实时单次查询(≤1000 条/请求),典型场景: "某 NCT 试验最新状态"、"BTK 抑制剂 Phase 3 在招募试验"、"某试验已发布的主次要终点结果"。明确边界: 批量 >10k 试验 / 全库 SQL 历史分析 → aact-bulk-trials; 关联 PubMed 文献 → pubmed-eutils; RCT 自动 GRADE 评级 → medical-evidence-grading; 引用入报告附录 → evidence-appendix-sync。跨平台无锁(Claude Code / Codex / Cursor 通用)。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retest remediated findings, detect regressions, and generate remediation status and certification artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build repeatable data-to-Docs pipelines from Sheets and Drive sources. Use for automated status reports, template-based document assembly, and scheduled publishing workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

查看 cheat-on-content 内容校准工作流的状态、rubric、待复盘与选题池。仅在明确提到该内容工作流或其状态文件时使用；不处理代码构建、项目进度或通用“状态”查询。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Commodore 1540/1541/1541C/1541-II compatible disk-drive behavior in EMULATORS, including IEC serial bus protocol, device numbers, KERNAL traps, CBM DOS commands/status, D64 image parsing, BAM/directory/file chains, PETSCII filenames, 6502 drive CPU/ROM/RAM expectations, 6522 VIA wiring, GCR/track/sector geometry, motor/head timing, and compatibility boundaries for 1541-like devices. Use when Codex reviews or edits C64, VIC-20, C264, COMMODORE disk, serial I/O, D64, CBM DOS, IEC, VIA, GCR, or 1541 drive code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The case-law chronicle of this repo's major failures — symptom, root cause, evidence, status, and the rule each battle minted — so nobody re-fights a settled battle or re-proposes a rejected fix. Use when a bug/incident looks familiar ("didn't this happen before?"), when you're about to propose an approach that may have been tried and rejected (e.g. shipping a migration from a package), when someone asks "why does rule X exist" / "why is done-by-lgtm a thing" / "what was incident 988", or when a bug-archaeology run hits the shallow-clone wall and needs the pre-June-2026 history. Trigger phrases: "has this broken before", "why can't packages ship migrations", "why did graduation fail", "why is the green-build lesson a rule", "what did we learn from incident NN". (For a live "build is green but the app is broken" symptom, start at crouton-diagnostics-index. NB keep this description free of any space-then-hash sequence — an unquoted YAML scalar treats space-hash as a comment start and silently truncates.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The router for how a change legally happens in this repo — which sign-off gate fires for which kind of change, what counts as approval, how the packages-edit guard works, and how work is allowed to reach main. Use when starting ANY change and unsure which rules apply, when an Edit to packages/* gets BLOCKED, when a pipeline issue sits on status:blocked and you need to know what unblocks it, or when asked "do I need sign-off for this", "how do I get this merged", "can I deploy this", "who approves X", "why won't my approval label/reaction do anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。