「audit」の検索結果

Audits implemented architecture boundaries, dependencies and ownership; not target design or plan review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits queries, transactions, consistency and persistence resource lifetimes; read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after /skill:phx-deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after /phx-deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance; Use when assessing overall project health…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Hex deps for supply-chain security risk — bidi chars; Use after mix deps.update, when checking if a package…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after phx-deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Hex deps for supply-chain security risk — bidi chars, compile-time exec, maintainer changes, typosquats, CVEs. Use after mix deps.update, when checking if a package upgrade is safe, or reviewing mix.lock PR diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Hex deps for supply-chain security risk — bidi chars, compile-time exec, maintainer changes, typosquats, CVEs. Use after mix deps.update, when checking if a package upgrade is safe, or reviewing mix.lock PR diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a vetted Hex package version in hex_vet.exs after a security review — manages the audit ledger, not the scanner. Use to approve a dep after /phx:deps-audit findings or to initialize hex_vet.exs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A complete marketing department in one skill. Website and landing-page audits with weighted 0-100 scores, copywriting with panel scoring and AI-slop removal, an 18-tactic ad hook engine, GEO/AEO for getting cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews, paid-ads creative diagnosis and production briefs, email sequences, LinkedIn/X writing, launch playbooks, positioning and offer design, competitor teardowns, app store optimization, honest analytics and test design. Use for ANY marketing task — audit, write, rewrite, diagnose, score, plan, launch, position, price, analyze — whenever the user mentions marketing, growth, conversion, copy, ads, hooks, CPM, ROAS, SEO, GEO, email, social, landing pages, funnels, launches, competitors, brand, positioning, pricing, or app stores, or says "my landing page sucks", "nobody's converting", "why are my CPMs up", "AI doesn't recommend us", "write me 20 hooks". Route via the table inside; fan out subagents for multi-dimensional work. Not for pure engineering, legal, or finance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit GitHub Actions that run AI agents for prompt injection, unsafe interpolation, sandbox gaps, and permissive actor rules. Use for agentic CI workflows, not general application code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve project-rules files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .agents/instructions, local overrides) so the agent keeps accurate project context. Use when the user asks to check, audit, review, update, improve, or fix their AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md, mentions "project rules maintenance" or "agent context optimization", or when the codebase has changed enough that the rules file may be stale. Scans the repository for every rules file, grades each against a quality rubric, outputs a quality report, and applies targeted edits only after user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

절제미를 측정 가능한 규칙으로 — 덜어내기(subtraction)·여백·위계를 AUDIT(렌더된 페이지를 데스크톱·모바일에서 재서 규칙별 PASS/FAIL+수치)하거나 APPLY(인벤토리 → 필요 없는 것 삭제 → 중복 병합 → 비운 자리를 초점 요소에 준다 → 재측정)한다. 초점 1개(1등 ≥ 2× 2등), 첫 화면 조각 ≤ 5, 서체 크기 ≤ 4, 헤드라인 ≤ 2줄, 첫 화면 단어 예산, 히어로 CTA ≤ 2, 액센트 1개, 장식 선·그리드·eyebrow 금지, 첫 화면 빈 면적 ≥ 65%, 얇은 화면 금지, 페이지 길이 예산. 규칙마다 출처 등급(실측/관례/휴리스틱). '덜어내 줘', '절제미', '너무 복잡해', '여백 살려줘', '심플하게', 'too busy', 'simplify the page', 'declutter', 'more whitespace', 「余白を活かして」, 「引き算のデザイン」, 「留白」, 「太擁擠了」 류에 트리거. 브랜드 토큰은 DESIGN.md가 이기고, 이 스킬은 양과 위계만 다룬다.

절제미를 측정 가능한 규칙으로 — 덜어내기(subtraction)·여백·위계를 AUDIT(렌더된 페이지를 데스크톱·모바일에서 재서 규칙별 PASS/FAIL+수치)하거나 APPLY(인벤토리 → 필요 없는 것 삭제 → 중복 병합 → 비운 자리를 초점 요소에 준다 → 재측정)한다. 초점 1개(1등 ≥ 2× 2등), 첫 화면 조각 ≤ 5, 서체 크기 ≤ 4, 헤드라인 ≤ 2줄, 첫 화면 단어 예산, 히어로 CTA ≤ 2, 액센트 1개, 장식 선·그리드·eyebrow 금지, 첫 화면 빈 면적 ≥ 65%, 얇은 화면 금지, 페이지 길이 예산. 규칙마다 출처 등급(실측/관례/휴리스틱). '덜어내 줘', '절제미', '너무 복잡해', '여백 살려줘', '심플하게', 'too busy', 'simplify the page', 'declutter', 'more whitespace', 「余白を活かして」, 「引き算のデザイン」, 「留白」, 「太擁擠了」 류에 트리거. 브랜드 토큰은 DESIGN.md가 이기고, 이 스킬은 양과 위계만 다룬다.

디자인·프론트 업계가 '감'으로 쓰던 인터페이스 디테일을 수치화한 규칙으로 적용(APPLY)하거나 감사(AUDIT)한다. Jakub Krehel의 make-interfaces-feel-better 철학을 계승 + HIG/Material/WCAG/DS 토큰/실무자 리서치로 확장한 17축·113규칙(provenance 등급별). 모션 타이밍·이징·동심원 radius·tabular-nums·44px 타깃·focus ring·prefers-reduced-motion 등. 'feel 좋게 다듬어줘', '인터페이스 디테일 적용', 'feel 점검', '마이크로 인터랙션 손봐줘', 'make this feel better', 'polish the interactions', 「インターフェースの細部を詰めて」, 「介面細節打磨」 류에 트리거. 브랜드 토큰은 DESIGN.md(omd:apply)가 우선.

실제 제품 route의 UI·UX copy를 검사해 제품 맥락 없이 반복된 생성형 기본 패턴, 브랜드 근거 없는 장식, 카드·그라데이션·아이콘 타일 남용, 번역투와 추상 카피를 rule ID와 line ref로 진단한다. 'AI slop 잡아줘', '템플릿 같아', '왜 AI가 만든 화면 같지?', 'anti-slop audit' 요청에 사용한다. 접근성 오류와 취향 차이를 별도 등급으로 구분한다.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

실제 제품 route의 UI·UX copy를 검사해 제품 맥락 없이 반복된 생성형 기본 패턴, 브랜드 근거 없는 장식, 카드·그라데이션·아이콘 타일 남용, 번역투와 추상 카피를 rule ID와 line ref로 진단한다. 'AI slop 잡아줘', '템플릿 같아', '왜 AI가 만든 화면 같지?', 'anti-slop audit' 요청에 사용한다. 접근성 오류와 취향 차이를 별도 등급으로 구분한다.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic false positive verification for security findings. Provides structured methodology to confirm or dismiss scanner results, manual audit findings, and automated alerts. Adapted from Trail of Bits. Use when triaging security scan results or verifying audit findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit/regression checks for the evidence-first survey pipeline: citation health, per-section coverage, placeholder leakage, and template repetition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS USE for test work that requires changes: write, add, generate, repair, or strengthen tests for existing code in xUnit, MSTest, NUnit, pytest, Vitest/Jest, Go, or another framework. Includes regression cases, failing or flaky tests, coverage-driven additions, and audit-then-fix requests. Focused work stays direct; broad or multi-stage work invokes test-engineer. DO NOT USE for only running tests, analysis-only audits, framework/platform migrations, a test blocked on a missing production seam (testability-obstacle), or MSTest API/configuration corrections that do not design new cases (writing-mstest-tests). Within an active test-engineer pipeline, reuse supplied guidance and do not re-enter this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。